Waste load allocation modeling with fuzzy goals; simulation-optimization approach

Presence of various types of uncertainties in water quality management problems has been recognized as one of the major challenges in water quality modeling. Vagueness, lack of adequate data and nonlinearity of cost and/or benefit functions in most of water quality and waste load allocation management problems have reduced the capability of direct inclusion of uncertainty analysis in the management models. This study presents a fuzzy waste load allocation model in which cost function and the water quality standards or the goals of dischargers and pollution control agencies are expressed with appropriate linear and/or nonlinear and nondecreasing and/or nonincreasing membership functions. QUAL2E and Classified Population Genetic Algorithm (CPGA) were coupled to develop the optimum strategy resulting in maximum value of the minimum nonzero membership values, which represent the optimum satisfaction level of the conflicting goals. Number of constraint violations was used to penalize the fitness function in order to eliminate the infeasible solutions at the final results. The model was applied to a hypothetical case example. Results show a very suitable convergence of the proposed algorithm to good of possibility to the near global optima. Effects of linear and nonlinear membership functions are examined and the results are analyzed.

[1]  Donald H. Burn,et al.  Water-Quality Management Through Combined Simulation-Optimization Approach , 1989 .

[2]  R. P. Oliveira,et al.  Operating rules for multireservoir systems , 1997 .

[3]  S. Ranjithan,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to solve a multiple objective groundwater pollution containment problem , 1994 .

[4]  P. P. Mujumdar,et al.  Fuzzy Waste Load Allocation Model: Simulation-Optimization Approach , 2004 .

[5]  D. Burn,et al.  Comparison of Optimization Formulations for Waste‐Load Allocations , 1992 .

[6]  Tim A. Wool,et al.  WASP4, a hydrodynamic and water-quality model - model theory, user's manual, and programmer's guide , 1988 .

[7]  M. Franchini Use of a genetic algorithm combined with a local search method for the automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models , 1996 .

[8]  K. Sasikumar,et al.  FUZZY OPTIMIZATION MODEL FOR WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF A RIVER SYSTEM , 1998 .

[9]  A. Simpson,et al.  An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Pipe Network Optimization , 1996 .

[10]  Jeanne S. Yulianti,et al.  Waste-Load Allocation Using Genetic Algorithms , 2001 .

[11]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Selection Schemes Used in Genetic Algorithms , 1990, FOGA.

[12]  Hugh Ellis,et al.  STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING MODELS FOR WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[13]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs , 1996, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[14]  K. Sasikumar,et al.  Application of fuzzy probability in water quality management of a river system , 2000, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[15]  S. Chapra Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[16]  Douglas A. Haith,et al.  Systems Analysis, TMDLs and Watershed Approach , 2003 .

[17]  Abbas Afshar,et al.  Simulation-optimization model for fuzzy waste load allocation , 2005 .

[18]  Barbara J. Lence,et al.  Chebyshev Model for Water-Quality Management , 1996 .