Radial Pronation Angle: A Novel Radiological Evaluation Index of Congenital Proximal Radioulnar Synostosis.

INTRODUCTION Congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis (CPRUS) is a relatively rare forearm deformity that is characterized by a fixed pronated forearm of varying severity. The osseous synostosis between the proximal part of the ulna and the radius can be seen on the X-ray images in most cases. Many researchers have attempted to identify methods to measure the disease severity to guide in the treatment of CPRUS. However, to describe the overall deformity, the use of multiple indicators is essential, and some of these measurements require special software or need to be conducted on cadavers. OBJECTIVE The aim of the current study was to introduce the radius pronation angle (RPA), a novel radiological evaluation index of CPRUS, and analyze the relationship between the RPA and the severity of the deformity. METHODS Three-dimensional models of 43 CPRUS forearms (19 left forearms and 24 right forearms) of 32 patients (23 males and 9 females; average age was 6 years 8 months; range, from 1.5 to 27 years) treated at Beijing Ji Shui Tan Hospital during 2016 to 2019 were reconstructed using a computer-assisted technique. The special flexed posterior-anterior views of the X-ray image (the f-PA view) of the forearms were obtained, and the forearm rotation angle and the ulnar inner rotation angle were measured on each forearm. The RPA was measured on the f-PA view, and the lengths of the osseous synostosis, ulna, and the radial head were measured on the computed tomography scan images using the multiplanar reconstruction function. The Pearson index was analyzed between the RPA and the other measurements. RESULTS The RPAs were correlated with the forearm rotation angle, ulnar inner rotation angle, relative length of the osseous synostosis, and the relative length of the radial head (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The RPA can be measured quickly and easily on the f-PA view of the X-ray image and can be used as a reliable indicator of the severity of CPRUS.

[1]  T. Murase,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of deformities of the radius and ulna in congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis , 2018, Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume).

[2]  J. Tsai Congenital radioulnar synostosis , 2017, Radiology case reports.

[3]  K. Doi,et al.  Modified osteotomy (Kanaya’s procedure) for congenital proximal radioulnar synostosis with posterior dislocation of radial head , 2014, The Journal of hand surgery, European volume.

[4]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  In vivo three‐dimensional motion analysis of the forearm with radioulnar synostosis treated by the kanaya procedure , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[5]  J. Griffet,et al.  Les synostoses congénitales radio-cubitales supérieures , 1986, International Orthopaedics.

[6]  S. Antón,et al.  Prehistoric radio-ulnar synostosis: implications for function , 2000 .

[7]  K. Ibaraki Mobilization of a Congenital Proximal Radioulnar Synostosis with Use of a Free Vascularized Fascio-Fat Graft*† , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  T Ogino,et al.  Congenital Radio-Ulnar Synostosis: Compensatory Rotation around the Wrist and Rotation Osteotomy. , 1987, Journal of hand surgery.

[9]  J. Griffet,et al.  Congenital superior radioulnar synostosis: A propos de 43 cas , 1986 .

[10]  J. Cleary,et al.  Congenital proximal radio-ulnar synostosis. Natural history and functional assessment. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  W. T. Green,et al.  Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis: surgical treatment. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  L. Ricciardi [Congenital radio-ulnar synostosis]. , 1969, Minerva ortopedica.

[13]  D. Greig Observations on the Bones in Congenital Proximal Radio-Ulnar Synostosis , 1925, Edinburgh medical journal.

[14]  D. Wilkie Congenital radio‐ulnar synostosis , 1913 .

[15]  H. G. Dawson A CONGENITAL DEFORMITY OF THE FOREARM AND ITS OPERATIVE TREATMENT , 1912, British medical journal.