Effect of process parameters on power requirements of vacuum swing adsorption technology for CO2 capture from flue gas

Abstract This study focuses on the effects of process and operating parameters – feed gas temperature, evacuation pressure and feed concentration – on the performance of carbon dioxide vacuum swing adsorption (CO 2 VSA) processes for CO 2 capture from gas, especially as it affects power consumption. To obtain reliable data on the VSA process, experimental work was conducted on a purposely built three bed CO 2 VSA pilot plant using commercial 13X zeolite. Both 6 step and 9 step cycles were used to determine the influences of temperature, evacuation pressure and feed concentration on process performance (recovery, purity, power and corresponding capture cost). A simple economic model for CO 2 capture was developed and employed herein. Through experiments and analysis, it is found that the feed gas temperature, evacuation pressure and feed concentration have significant effects on power consumption and CO 2 capture cost. Our data demonstrate that the CO 2 VSA process has good recovery (>70%), purity (>90%) and low power cost (4–10 kW/TPDc) when operating with 40 °C feed gas provided relatively deep vacuum is used. Enhanced performance is obtained when higher feed gas concentration is fed to the plant, as expected. Our data indicates large potential for application of CO 2 VSA to CO 2 capture from flue gas.

[1]  Tatsuo Kabata,et al.  Technology for removing carbon dioxide from power plant flue gas by the physical adsorption method , 1996 .

[2]  H. Herzog,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuel Use , 2004 .

[3]  R. T. Yang,et al.  Comparison of Activated Carbon and Zeolite 13X for CO2 Recovery from Flue-Gas by Pressure Swing Adsorption , 1995 .

[4]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy , 2004 .

[5]  Armin D. Ebner,et al.  New Pressure Swing Adsorption Cycles for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration , 2005 .

[6]  Matsumoto Shuichi,et al.  CO/sub 2/ recovery in molten carbonate fuel cell system by pressure swing adsorption , 1993 .

[7]  Dianne E. Wiley,et al.  Economics of CO2 and Mixed Gas Geosequestration of Flue Gas Using Gas Separation Membranes , 2006 .

[8]  Yeong-Koo Yeo,et al.  Optimal operation of the pressure swing adsorption (PSA) process for CO2 recovery , 2003 .

[9]  雅礼 加藤,et al.  セラミックス吸収材とメタン改質による燃焼前 CO2 回収 , 2005 .

[10]  Soon-Haeng Cho,et al.  NON-ISOTHERMAL ADSORPTION OF NITROGEN-CARBON DIOXIDE MIXTURE IN A FIXED BED OF ZEOLITE-X , 1994 .

[11]  Cheng-Tung Chou,et al.  Carbon dioxide recovery by vacuum swing adsorption , 2004 .

[12]  Kee-Kahb Koo,et al.  Effect of Rinse and Recycle Methods on the Pressure Swing Adsorption Process To Recover CO2 from Power Plant Flue Gas Using Activated Carbon , 2002 .

[13]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimization of Pressure Swing Adsorption and Fractionated Vacuum Pressure Swing Adsorption Processes for CO2 Capture , 2005 .

[14]  Soon-Haeng Cho,et al.  Numerical Analysis on the Power Consumption of the PSA Process for Recovering CO2 from Flue Gas , 2002 .

[15]  Itsuo Norikyo,et al.  Application of the Circulating Moving Bed Process for CO2 Recovery from the Flue Gas of Coal-Thermal Power Plants. , 2002 .