Good Governance and Happiness in Nations: Technical Quality Precedes Democracy and Quality Beats Size

Average happiness differs markedly across nations and there appears to be a system in these differences. This paper considers the role of quality of governance, and in particular the role of technical quality as opposed to democratic quality. A comparison of 127 nations in 2006 shows strong correlations between the quality of governance and average happiness of citizens. The correlation between technical quality and happiness is +0.75 and the correlation between democratic quality and happiness is +0.60. Technical quality correlates with happiness in rich and poor nations, while democratic quality only correlates with happiness in rich nations. The quality of governance appears to be more important for happiness than the size of governments: the relation between quality and happiness is independent of size, while the relation between size and happiness fully depends on quality. The correlation between technical quality and happiness appears to be independent of culture; it exists not only in western nations, but also in Eastern Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Asia and Africa. This indicates that technically good governance is a universal condition for happiness, and not just a western ideology. Democratic quality adds substantially to the positive effects of technical quality once technical quality has reached some minimal level.

[1]  HO LokSang.  Happiness and Public Policy , 2005 .

[2]  Christian Bjørnskov,et al.  The bigger the better? Evidence of the effect of government size on life satisfaction around the world , 2005 .

[3]  C. Bjørnskov.  How Comparable are the Gallup World Poll Life Satisfaction Data? , 2010 .

[4]  N. Marks,et al.  A well‐being manifesto for a flourishing society , 2004 .

[5]  Ruut Veenhoven,et al.  Quality-of-Life in Individualistic Society , 1999 .

[6]  R. Layard.  Happiness: Lessons from a New Science , 2005 .

[7]  H. D. Soto.  The mystery of capital : the role of property rights in creating wealth and alleviating poverty , 2004 .

[8]  Lok Sang Ho,et al.  Happiness and Public Policy , 2006 .

[9]  Joshua C. Hall,et al.  Economic Freedom of the World: Annual Report , 2008 .

[10]  J. Marschak,et al.  Oxford Economic Papers. , 1939 .

[11]  Ruut Veenhoven,et al.  A comparison of 43 nations in the early 1990 ' s , 2003 .

[12]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  Governance Indicators: Where are We, Where Should We Be Going? , 2007 .

[13]  R. Easterlin.  Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence , 1974 .

[14]  Alois Stutzer,et al.  Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility , 2002 .

[15]  S. Lyubomirsky,et al.  The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success? , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  R. Veenhoven.  Conditions of Happiness , 1984 .

[17]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters VII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2007 , 2008 .

[18]  J. Ott,et al.  Level and Inequality of Happiness in Nations: Does Greater Happiness of a Greater Number Imply Greater Inequality in Happiness? , 2005 .

[19]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Happiness: A Revolution in Economics , 2008 .

[20]  Aart Kraay,et al.  Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2008 , 2006 .

[21]  McColmFreedom House,et al.  Freedom in the World , 1993 .

[22]  J. Helliwell,et al.  How's Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well-Being , 2006, British Journal of Political Science.

[23]  Hadley Cantril,et al.  The pattern of human concerns , 1965 .