A generic, ‘in-house’, alphanumeric paging system for prospective activity impairments after traumatic brain injury

Objective: For settings having suitable infrastructure, generic, ‘in-house’ alphanumeric paging systems can be constructed that are fully under clinician control. Development of such a system for therapeutic application is described and a single-case study presented that assessed whether the system could improve repetitive, prospective use of a daily planner. Design: ABA′ single case. Methods: The participant was male, in his mid-30s, having cognitive impairments subsequent to recent TBI superimposed on remote neurological changes. The pager reminded him to record therapeutic information in a daily planner, for discussion with a family member each evening. Results: During intervention (B) trials, reliable memory log usage was noted. By trial five of return-to-baseline (A′) trials, there was decreased memory log use. Conclusions: Alphanumeric paging facilitated reliable use of a memory log compensation technique. The ‘in-house’ paging system proved particularly suitable for intervention development. Limits of the study are discussed and other therapeutically useful wireless technologies are noted.

[1]  Simon P. Levine,et al.  Computer–assisted interactive task guidance: Facilitating the performance of a simulated vocational task , 1992 .

[2]  M. Bergman Successful Mastery With a Cognitive Orthotic in People With Traumatic Brain Injury , 2000, Applied neuropsychology.

[3]  C. Mateer,et al.  Effectiveness of an attention-training program. , 1987, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[4]  H. Emslie,et al.  George: Learning to live independently with NeuroPage®. , 1999 .

[5]  E Cole,et al.  Design and outcomes of computer-based cognitive prosthetics for brain injury: a field study of three subjects. , 1994, NeuroRehabilitation.

[6]  M A Flannery,et al.  Reminding technology for prospective memory disability: a case study. , 1997, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[7]  J. Evans,et al.  Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[8]  Salazar,et al.  Rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  L. Rothi,et al.  Restitution and substitution: two theories of recovery with application to neurobehavioral treatment. , 1983, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[10]  D. G. Lamb,et al.  Use of a comprehensive programme of external cueing to enhance procedural memory in a patient with dense amnesia. , 1996, Brain injury.

[11]  T. Wade,et al.  Mobile phones as a new memory aid: a preliminary investigation using case studies. , 2001, Brain injury.

[12]  J. Whyte,et al.  Use of a Portable Voice Organizer to Remember Therapy Goals in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Within-Subjects Trial , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[13]  Simon P. Levine,et al.  Performance considerations for people with cognitive impairment in accessing assistive technologies , 1992 .

[14]  Debra Schreckenghost,et al.  Web-Based Assistive Technology Interventions for Cognitive Impairments After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Selective Review and Two Case Studies. , 2004 .

[15]  N. A. Hersh,et al.  NeuroPage: The Rehabilitation of Memory Dysfunction by Prosthetic Memory and Cueing. , 1994, NeuroRehabilitation.

[16]  D. Chute,et al.  ProsthesisWare: A new class of software supporting the activities of daily living. , 1988 .

[17]  J. Evans,et al.  External cueing systems in the rehabilitation of executive impairments of action , 1998, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[18]  Elliot Cole,et al.  Cognitive prosthetics: an overview to a method of treatment , 1999 .

[19]  H. J. Kim,et al.  Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory-impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. , 1999, Brain injury.

[20]  A. Mihailidis,et al.  Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art , 2004 .

[21]  H. Emslie,et al.  Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid , 1997, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[22]  M. Bergman The Benefits of a Cognitive Orthotic in Brain Injury Rehabilitation , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[23]  M. D. van den Broek,et al.  Evaluation of an electronic memory aid in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of prospective memory deficits. , 2000, Brain injury.

[24]  H. J. Kim,et al.  Electronic memory aids for outpatient brain injury: follow-up findings. , 2000, Brain injury.