Nonlinear EEG activation evoked by low-strength low-frequency magnetic fields

Recent electrophysiological evidence suggested the existence of a human magnetic sense, but the kind of dynamical law that governed the stimulus-response relationship was not established. We tested the hypothesis that brain potentials evoked by the onset of a weak, low-frequency magnetic field were nonlinearly related to the stimulus. A field of 1G, 60 Hz was applied for 2s, with a 5s inter-stimulus period, and brain potentials were recorded from occipital electrodes in eight subjects, each of whom were measured twice, with at least 1 week between measurements. The recorded signals were subjected to nonlinear (recurrence analysis) and linear (time averaging) analyses. Using recurrence analysis, magnetosensory evoked potentials (MEPs) were detected in each subject in both the initial and replicate studies, with one exception. All MEPs exhibited the expected latency but differed in dynamical characteristics, indicating that they were nonlinearly related to the stimulus. MEPs were not detected using time averaging, thereby further confirming their nonlinearity. Evolutionarily conditioned structures that help mediate linear field-transduction in lower life forms may be expressed and functionally utilized in humans, but in a role where they facilitate vulnerability to man-made environmental fields.

[1]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  SENSORY TRANSDUCTION AS A PROPOSED MODEL FOR BIOLOGICAL DETECTION OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS , 2001 .

[2]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Visual Evoked Potentials in Man: New Developments , 1978 .

[3]  J. Zbilut,et al.  Recurrence Quantification Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems , 2004 .

[4]  J. Zbilut,et al.  Embeddings and delays as derived from quantification of recurrence plots , 1992 .

[5]  Soo-Yong Kim,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of the EEG in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease and Vascular Dementia , 2001, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[6]  R B Szamier,et al.  Special cutaneous receptor organs of fish: IV. Ampullary organs of the nonelectric catfish, Kryptopterus , 1969, Journal of morphology.

[7]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense , 2007, Neuroscience.

[8]  C L Webber,et al.  Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  Charles Polk,et al.  CRC Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields , 1986 .

[10]  Andrew Chesson,et al.  Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  F. Barnes,et al.  Handbook of biological effects of electromagnetic fields , 2007 .

[12]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Nonlinear changes in brain electrical activity due to cell phone radiation , 2003, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  Terence W. Picton,et al.  Human event-related potentials , 1988 .

[14]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[15]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Electroreception in monotremes. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[16]  R. Nesse,et al.  Evolution and the origins of disease. , 1998, Scientific American.