Estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks: Routines for MATLAB and R

Ulrich and Vorberg (Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71: 1219–1227, 2009) introduced a novel approach for estimating discrimination performance in two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks. This approach avoids pitfalls that are inherent when the order of the standard and the comparison is neglected in estimating the difference limen (DL), as in traditional approaches. The present article provides MATLAB and R routines that implement this novel procedure for estimating DLs. These routines also allow to account for processing failures such as lapses or finger errors and can be applied to experimental designs in which the standard and comparison differ only along the task-relevant dimension, as well as to designs in which the stimuli differ in more than one dimension. In addition, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to check the quality of our routines.

[1]  T. Wickens.  Elementary Signal Detection Theory , 2001 .

[2]  H. Strasburger,et al.  Fitting the psychometric function , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[4]  S M Abel,et al.  Duration discrimination of noise and tone bursts. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  F. Jäkel,et al.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[6]  R. Ulrich,et al.  On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: A comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J. Guilford.  Psychometric methods, 2nd ed. , 1954 .

[8]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[9]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[10]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  Improving the Estimation of Psychometric Functions in 2AFC Discrimination Tasks , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[11]  H. Ross,et al.  Is The Weber Fraction a Function of Physical or Perceived Input? , 1964 .

[12]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  A model for the time-order error in contrast discrimination , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  H. Levitt.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[16]  A. Kristofferson,et al.  Judgments about the duration of brief stimuli , 1974 .

[17]  M. García-Pérez,et al.  Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009) , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Miguel Ángel García Pérez,et al.  Correction to “Reminder and 2AFC tasks provide similar estimates of the difference limen: A reanalysis of data from Lapid, Ulrich, and Rammsayer (2008) and a discussion of Ulrich and Vorberg (2009)” , 2010 .

[19]  D. Vorberg,et al.  Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: Pitfalls and improved estimators , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[20]  Thomas H Rammsayer,et al.  Effects of time-order, interstimulus interval, and feedback in duration discrimination of noise bursts in the 50- and 1000-ms ranges. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[21]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[22]  J. Nachmias.  The role of virtual standards in visual discrimination , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Ulrich.  DLs in reminder and 2AFC tasks: Data and models , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[24]  H. Blackwell,et al.  Studies of psychophysical methods for measuring visual thresholds. , 1952, Journal of the Optical Society of America.