Need for Closure and the Social Response to Terrorism

It has been long contended that terrorism is a form of psychological warfare with the aim of advancing political objectives through the spreading of fear. The present set of five studies explored the relation between need for closure and the social response to terrorism. We found support for the notion that reminders of terrorist attacks elevate the need for closure and that the need for closure may enhance ingroup identification; interdependence with others; outgroup derogation; and support for tough and decisive counterterrorism policies and for leaders likely to carry out such policies. The implications of this research for the claims of terrorist ideologues regarding the efficacy of terrorism are discussed.

[1]  M. Hogg.  Subjective Uncertainty Reduction through Self-categorization: A Motivational Theory of Social Identity Processes , 2000 .

[2]  M. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction, Self-Enhancement, and Ingroup Identification , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[3]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  L. Skitka.  Patriotism or Nationalism? Understanding Post-September 11, 2001, Flag-Display Behavior1 , 2005 .

[5]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[6]  J. Turner.  Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[7]  M. Argyrides,et al.  September 11: Immediate and Long Term Effects on Measures of Aggression, Prejudice, and Person Perception , 2004 .

[8]  Brian Michael Jenkins,et al.  International terrorism : a new mode of conflict , 1975 .

[9]  M. Elliott,et al.  A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated closing of the mind: "seizing" and "freezing". , 1996, Psychological review.

[11]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Motivated Cognition and Group Interaction: Need for Closure Affects the Contents and Processes of Collective Negotiations , 1999 .

[13]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Terror's Epistemic Consequences: Existential Threats and the Quest for Certainty and Closure , 2004 .

[14]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  Groups as epistemic providers: need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. , 2006, Psychological review.

[15]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  Collateral damage: The psychological consequences of America's war on terrorism. , 2006 .

[16]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[17]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty, entitativity, and group identification , 2007 .

[19]  Debby E. Doughty,et al.  Television Exposure in Children after a Terrorist Incident , 2001, Psychiatry.

[20]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[21]  M. Sobel.  Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[22]  J. Mueller,et al.  War, presidents, and public opinion , 1973 .

[23]  Daniel M. Ogilvie,et al.  American Roulette: The Effect of Reminders of Death on Support for George W. Bush in the 2004 Presidential Election , 2005 .

[24]  V. Chanley,et al.  Trust in Government in the Aftermath of 9/11: Determinants and Consequences , 2002 .

[25]  D. Bar-Tal,et al.  The effect of a major event on stereotyping: terrorist attacks in Israel and Israeli adolescents' perceptions of Palestinians, Jordanians and Arabs , 2001 .

[26]  Lisa Thalji,et al.  Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: findings from the National Study of Americans' Reactions to September 11. , 2002, JAMA.

[27]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. , 1993 .

[28]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATION , 1995 .

[29]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Deliver us from Evil: The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  A. Kruglanski.  The Psychology of Closed Mindedness , 2004 .

[31]  Curtis D. Hardin,et al.  Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. , 1996 .

[32]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  When similarity breeds content: need for closure and the allure of homogeneous and self-resembling groups. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.