FUNCTIONAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR AND POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE CORRECTION OF ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS

[1]  M. Abel,et al.  Experience with an online prospective database on adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: development and implementation , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[2]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Comparison between constrained and non-constrained Cobb techniques for the assessment of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[3]  J. Dubousset,et al.  Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees—A radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[4]  L. Lenke,et al.  Radiographic Outcomes of Anterior Spinal Fusion Versus Posterior Spinal Fusion With Thoracic Pedicle Screws for Treatment of Lenke Type I Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves , 2005, Spine.

[5]  D. Burton,et al.  The Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2003, Spine.

[6]  L. Lenke,et al.  Correlation of Radiographic, Clinical, and Patient Assessment of Shoulder Balance Following Fusion Versus Nonfusion of the Proximal Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2002, Spine.

[7]  G. Picetti,et al.  Anterior endoscopic correction of scoliosis. , 2002, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[8]  V. Deviren,et al.  Does Instrumented Anterior Scoliosis Surgery Lead to Kyphosis, Pseudarthrosis, or Inadequate Correction in Adults? , 2002, Spine.

[9]  R. Betz,et al.  Spontaneous Proximal Thoracic Curve Correction After Isolated Fusion of the Main Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2001, Spine.

[10]  L. Lenke,et al.  Prospective Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Single Solid Rod Instrumented Anterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2001, Spine.

[11]  R. Betz,et al.  The effect of continued posterior spinal growth on sagittal contour in patients treated by anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. , 2000, Spine.

[12]  R. Betz,et al.  Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[13]  R. Betz,et al.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[14]  P. Connolly,et al.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Long-term effect of instrumentation extending to the lumbar spine. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  L. Lenke,et al.  Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  L. Lenke,et al.  Preventing Decompensation in King Type II Curves Treated With Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation. Strict Guidelines for Selective Thoracic Fusion , 1992, Spine.

[17]  R. Betz,et al.  Coronal Decompensation Produced by Cotrel—Dubousset “Derotation” Maneuver for Idiopathic Right Thoracic Scoliosis , 1991, Spine.

[18]  J. Dickson,et al.  Harrington instrumentation and arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis. A twenty-one-year follow-up. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  J. Birch,et al.  Frontal Plane and Sagittal Plane Balance following Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1989, Spine.

[20]  T. C. Howard,et al.  Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Lumbosacral Motion below Fusion Levels in Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1988, Spine.

[21]  C. L. Nash,et al.  A study of vertebral rotation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  H. Halm,et al.  [Halm-Zielke instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Results in 25 consecutive patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years]. , 2000, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete.