Differences in developmental plasticity and growth rate among drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum)

Understanding how growth and development of durum wheat cultivars respond to drought could provide a basis to develop crop improvement programmes in drought-affected tropical and subtropical countries. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to study the responses of five durum wheat cultivars to moisture stress at different developmental phases. Phenology, total dry matter (TDM), relative growth rate (RGR), leaf area ratio (LAR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf weight ratio (LWR), specific leaf area (SLA) and shoot:root ratio were compared. Pre-anthesis moisture stress delayed phenological development, whereas post-anthesis moisture stress accelerated it. TDM accumulation rate was different between drought-resistant and susceptible cultivars. RGR and its components changed with age and moisture availability. Drought-resistant cultivars had a high RGR in favourable periods of the growing season and a low RGR during moisture stress. In contrast, the drought-susceptible cultivar (Po) showed an opposite trend. LAR explained the differences in RGR (r=0.788) best, whereas the relationship between NAR and RGR was not significant. Even though both LWR and SLA were important factors determining the potential growth rate, LWR was of major importance to describe cultivar differences in LAR, and consequently in RGR. The drought-resistant cultivars Omrabi-5 and Boohai showed vigorous root development and/or a low shoot:root ratio. It is concluded that biomass allocation is the major factor explaining variation in RGR among the investigated durum wheat cultivars.

[1]  M. Donatelli,et al.  Genotype and Water Limitation Effects on Phenology, Growth, and Transpiration Efficiency in Grain Sorghum , 1992 .

[2]  H. Lambers.  A PHYSIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF GENETIC-VARIATION IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE WITHIN PLANTAGO MAJOR L , 1989 .

[3]  J. Andel,et al.  ANALYSIS OF GROWTH AND NUTRITION OF SIX PLANT SPECIES OF WOODLAND CLEARINGS , 1981 .

[4]  H. Lambers,et al.  Analyses of growth based on net assimilation rate and nitrogen productivity: their physiological background , 1990 .

[5]  J. Passioura,et al.  Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. , 1977 .

[6]  D. J. Watson.  The Physiological Basis of Variation in Yield , 1952 .

[7]  M. Karimi,et al.  Crop growth and relative growth rates of old and modern wheat cultivars , 1991 .

[8]  H. Lambers,et al.  Growth and competitive ability of a highly plastic and a marginally plastic genotype of Plantago major in a fluctuating environment , 1986 .

[9]  R. Hunt.  Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis , 1983 .

[10]  P. Struik,et al.  Agroclimatic analysis: a tool for planning sustainable durum wheat (Triticum turgidum var. durum) production in Ethiopia. , 1993 .

[11]  E. Kanemasu,et al.  Wheat recovery from drought stress at the tillering stage of development , 1990 .

[12]  M. Moncur,et al.  Water stress and phenology in wheat , 1977 .

[13]  H. Poorter,et al.  INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN RELATIVE GROWTH RATE : ON ECOLOGICAL CAUSES AND PHYSIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES , 2003 .

[14]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants , 1980 .

[15]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Leaf area ratio and net assimilation rate of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate , 1990, Oecologia.

[16]  R. Fischer,et al.  Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars, 1. Grain yield responses. , 1978 .

[17]  H. Lambers,et al.  A physiological analysis of genotypic variation in relative growth rate: Can growth rate confer ecological advantage? , 1987 .