Effect of Water Volume and Biogas Volumetric Flowrate in Biogas Purification Through Water Scrubbing Method

Energy supply is a crucial issue in the world in the last few years. The increase in energy demand caused by population growth and resource depletion of world oil reserves provides determination to produce and to use renewable energies. One of the them is biogas. However, until now the use of biogas has not yet been maximized because of its poor purity. According to the above problem, the research has been carried out using the method of water absorption. Under this method it is expected that the rural community is able to apply it. Therefore, their economy and productivity can be increased. This study includes variations of absorbing water volume (V) and input biogas volume flow rate (Q). Raw biogas which is flowed into the absorbent will be analyzed according to the determined absorbing water volume and input biogas volume rate. Improvement on biogas composition through the biogas purification method was obtained. The level of CO2 and H2S was reduced significantly specifically in the early minutes of purification process. On the other hand, the level of CH4 was increased improving the quality of raw biogas. However, by the time of biogas purification the composition of purified biogas was nearly similar to the raw biogas. The main reason for this result was an increasing in pH of absorbent. It was shown that higher water volume and slower biogas volume rate obtained better results in reducing the CO2 and H2S and increasing CH4 compared to those of lower water volume and higher biogas volume rate respectively. The purification method has a good promising in improving the quality of raw biogas and has advantages as it is cheap and easy to be operated.

[1]  R. Freitag,et al.  Investigation of factors influencing biogas production in a large-scale thermophilic municipal biogas plant , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[2]  Li Jian,et al.  Socioeconomic Barriers to Biogas Development in Rural Southwest China: An Ethnographic Case Study , 2009 .

[3]  H. Kalipcilar,et al.  Development of zeolite filled polycarbonate mixed matrix gas separation membranes , 2006 .

[4]  R. Wirth,et al.  Biogas Production from Protein-Rich Biomass: Fed-Batch Anaerobic Fermentation of Casein and of Pig Blood and Associated Changes in Microbial Community Composition , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  William J. Jewell,et al.  In situ methane enrichment in methanogenic energy crop digesters , 1994 .

[6]  K. Kobe The properties of gases and liquids , 1959 .

[7]  T. Kaosol,et al.  Enhancement of biogas production potential for anaerobic co-digestion of wastewater using decanter cake. , 2013 .

[8]  K. Jones,et al.  Integrated Biological Treatment and Biogas Production in a Small‐Scale Slaughterhouse in Rural Ghana , 2006, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[9]  T. R. Sreekrishnan,et al.  Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques--a review. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[10]  A. Lemmer,et al.  Effects of temperature, pH and O2 on the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by external biological desulfurization in a full scale fixed-bed trickling bioreactor (FBTB) , 2013 .