Invariant probability measures and dynamics of exponential linear type maps

Abstract We consider the problem of the asymptotic size of the random maximum-weight matching of a sparse random graph, which we translate into dynamics of the operator in the space of distribution functions. A tight condition for the uniqueness of the globally attracting fixed point is provided, which extends the result of Karp and Sipser [Maximum matchings in sparse random graphs. 22nd Ann. Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (Nashville, TN, 28–30 October, 1981). IEEE, New York, 1981, pp. 364–375] from deterministic weight distributions (Dirac measures μ) to general ones. Given a probability measure μ which corresponds to the weight distribution of a link of a random graph, we form a positive linear operator Φμ (convolution) on distribution functions and then analyze a family of its exponents, with parameter λ, which corresponds to the connectivity of a sparse random graph. The operator 𝕋 relates the distribution F on the subtrees to the distribution 𝕋F on the node of the tree by 𝕋F=exp (−λΦμF). We prove that for every probability measure μ and every λ<e, there exists a unique globally attracting fixed point of the operator; the probability measure corresponding to this fixed point can then be used to compute the expected maximum-weight matching on a sparse random graph. This result is called the e-cutoff phenomenon. For deterministic distributions and λ>e, there is no fixed point attractor. We further establish that the uniqueness of the invariant measure of the underlying operator is not a monotone property of the average connectivity; this parallels similar non-monotonicity results in the statistical physics context.

[1]  M. Sipser,et al.  Maximum matching in sparse random graphs , 1981, 22nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1981).

[2]  Richard M. Karp,et al.  Maximum Matchings in Sparse Random Graphs , 1981, FOCS 1981.

[3]  D. Aldous Asymptotics in the random assignment problem , 1992 .

[4]  J. Berg,et al.  Percolation and the hard-core lattice gas model , 1994 .

[5]  Olle Häggström,et al.  Nonmonotonic Behavior in Hard-Core and Widom–Rowlinson Models , 1999 .

[6]  Svante Janson,et al.  Random graphs , 2000, Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization.

[7]  V. Baladi Positive transfer operators and decay of correlations , 2000 .

[8]  Yuval Peres,et al.  Glauber dynamics on trees and hyperbolic graphs , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing.

[9]  Fabio Martinelli,et al.  The Ising model on trees: boundary conditions and mixing time , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  David Gamarnik,et al.  Maximum Weight Independent Sets and Matchings in Sparse Random Graphs. Exact Results Using the Local Weak Convergence Method , 2004, APPROX-RANDOM.

[11]  David Gamarnik Linear phase transition in random linear constraint satisfaction problems , 2004, SODA '04.

[12]  J. Michael Steele,et al.  The Objective Method: Probabilistic Combinatorial Optimization and Local Weak Convergence , 2004 .

[13]  Johan Wästlund AN EASY PROOF OF THE ζ ( 2 ) LIMIT IN THE RANDOM ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM , 2006 .

[14]  Alan M. Frieze,et al.  Random graphs , 2006, SODA '06.