Modelling lay-up automation and production rate interaction on the cost of large stiffened panel components

This paper presents an integrated design and costing method for large stiffened panels for the purpose of investigating the influence and interaction of lay-up technology and production rate on manufacturing cost. A series of wing cover panels (≈586kg, 19·9m 2 ) have been sized with realistic requirements considering manual and automated lay-up routes. The integrated method has enabled the quantification of component unit cost sensitivity to changes in annual production rate and employed equipment maximum deposition rate. Moreover the results demonstrate the interconnected relationship between lay-up process and panel design, and unit cost. The optimum unit cost solution when using automated lay-up is a combination of the minimum deposition rate and minimum number of lay-up machines to meet the required production rate. However, the location of the optimum unit cost, at the boundaries between the number of lay-up machines required, can make unit cost very sensitive to small changes in component design, production rate, and equipment maximum deposition rate.

[1]  K. Potter,et al.  The engineering aspects of automated prepreg layup: History, present and future , 2012 .

[2]  Jürgen Wittig.  Process automation for the production of large composite parts , 2005 .

[3]  Birna P. Kristinsdottir,et al.  Optimal design of large composite panels with varying loads , 2001 .

[4]  Malin Åkermo,et al.  Material Selection for a Curved C-Spar Based on Cost Optimization , 2011 .

[5]  Per Wennhage,et al.  Integrated cost/weight optimization of aircraft structures , 2010 .

[6]  Malin Åkermo,et al.  Modelling component cost in compression moulding of thermoplastic composite and sandwich components , 2000 .

[7]  Jian Jiang,et al.  Perimeter-Area Relation and Fractal Dimension of Fracture Surfaces , 2009 .

[8]  Peter J. Schubel,et al.  Technical cost modelling for a generic 45-m wind turbine blade producedby vacuum infusion (VI) , 2010 .

[9]  Layne T. Watson,et al.  Optimal design of composite wing structures with blended laminates , 2004 .

[10]  Fred W. Williams,et al.  Cost Optimization of Stiffened Panels Using VICONOPT , 1998 .

[11]  Richard Butler,et al.  Optimum buckling design of composite wing cover panels with manufacturing constraints , 2007 .

[12]  Paolo Feraboli.  Composite Materials Strength Determination Within the Current Certification Methodology for Aircraft Structures , 2009 .

[13]  E. F. Bruhn,et al.  Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures , 1973 .

[14]  Christos Kassapoglou,et al.  Simultaneous cost and weight minimization of composite-stiffened panels under compression and shear , 1997 .

[15]  Christos Kassapoglou,et al.  Stacking Sequence Blending of Multiple Composite Laminates Using Genetic Algorithms , 2002 .

[16]  Jian S. Dai,et al.  Product Cost Estimation: Technique Classification and Methodology Review , 2006 .

[17]  M. G. Bader,et al.  Selection of composite materials and manufacturing routes for cost-effective performance , 2002 .

[18]  M. C. Niu,et al.  Airframe Stress Analysis and Sizing , 2011 .

[19]  Richard Curran,et al.  Review of Aerospace Engineering Cost Modelling: The Genetic Causal Approach , 2004 .