Experience with Integrating Diagnostic Decision Support Software with Electronic Health Records: Benefits versus Risks of Information Sharing

Introduction: Reducing misdiagnosis has long been a goal of medical informatics. Current thinking has focused on achieving this goal by integrating diagnostic decision support into electronic health records. Methods: A diagnostic decision support system already in clinical use was integrated into electronic health record systems at two large health systems, after clinician input on desired capabilities. The decision support provided three outputs: editable text for use in a clinical note, a summary including the suggested differential diagnosis with a graphical representation of probability, and a list of pertinent positive and pertinent negative findings (with onsets). Results: Structured interviews showed widespread agreement that the tool was useful and that the integration improved workflow. There was disagreement among various specialties over the risks versus benefits of documenting intermediate diagnostic thinking. Benefits were most valued by specialists involved in diagnostic testing, who were able to use the additional clinical context for richer interpretation of test results. Risks were most cited by physicians making clinical diagnoses, who expressed concern that a process that generated diagnostic possibilities exposed them to legal liability. Discussion and Conclusion: Reconciling the preferences of the various groups could include saving only the finding list as a patient-wide resource, saving intermediate diagnostic thinking only temporarily, or adoption of professional guidelines to clarify the role of decision support in diagnosis.

[1]  Marc S. Williams,et al.  Enhancing genomic laboratory reports: A qualitative analysis of provider review , 2016, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[2]  I. Kohane,et al.  Escaping the EHR trap--the future of health IT. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Kenneth D. Mandl,et al.  SMART on FHIR: a standards-based, interoperable apps platform for electronic health records , 2016, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Michael M. Segal Genome interpretation: Clinical correlation is recommended , 2015, Applied & translational genomics.

[5]  Ellen Balka,et al.  Ghost Charts and Shadow Records: Implication for System Design , 2010, MedInfo.

[6]  Michael M. Segal,et al.  Evidence-based decision support for pediatric rheumatology reduces diagnostic errors , 2016, Pediatric Rheumatology.

[7]  J. Bowen Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  W B Schwartz,et al.  Medicine and the computer. The promise and problems of change. , 1970, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. , 2000, Research in nursing & health.

[10]  Clement J. McDonald,et al.  What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support? , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[11]  T. Fahey,et al.  The epidemiology of malpractice claims in primary care: a systematic review , 2013, BMJ Open.

[12]  Michael Segal,et al.  Integrating a Diagnostic Decision Support Tool into an Electronic Health Record and Relevant Clinical Workflows through Standards-Based Exchange , 2014, AMIA.

[13]  Raphael Schiffmann,et al.  Decision support for diagnosis , 2012, Neurology.

[14]  J P Kassirer,et al.  A report card on computer-assisted diagnosis--the grade: C. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  G Hripcsak,et al.  Decision support in healthcare. , 1995, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[16]  Lynn Feldman,et al.  Enhancing genomic laboratory reports from the patients' view: A qualitative analysis , 2015, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[17]  Michael M. Segal,et al.  Clinical Pertinence Metric Enables Hypothesis-Independent Genome-Phenome Analysis for Neurologic Diagnosis , 2015, Journal of child neurology.

[18]  Rebecca A Betensky,et al.  Evidence-Based Decision Support for Neurological Diagnosis Reduces Errors and Unnecessary Workup , 2014, Journal of child neurology.

[19]  B. Miller,et al.  Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. , 2016, Military medicine.