Virtual laboratories in science education: students’ motivation and experiences in two tertiary biology courses

Abstract Potential benefits of simulations and virtual laboratory exercises in natural sciences have been both theorised and studied recently. This study reports findings from a pilot study on student attitude, motivation and self-efficacy when using the virtual laboratory programme Labster. The programme allows interactive learning about the workflows and procedures of biological and biochemical experiments, the operation of relevant apparatuses, including the ability to adjust parameters, and the production of results. The programme was used as supplement to mandatory laboratory exercises in two undergraduate courses (i. microbiology and ii. pharmaceutical toxicology) at the University of Southern Denmark. With a theoretical basis in motivational theories, students’ (n = 73) motivation and attitude towards the virtual exercises were evaluated. After completing virtual laboratory cases, the students felt significantly more confident and comfortable operating laboratory equipment, but they did not feel more motivated to engage in virtual laboratories compared to real laboratories. Teachers observed that students were able to participate in discussions at higher levels than in previous years where the programme was not used. The study concludes that virtual laboratories have the potential to improve students’ pre-laboratory preparation.

[1]  Deanna Raineri Virtual laboratories enhance traditional undergraduate biology laboratories , 2001 .

[2]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[4]  Zoltan K. Nagy,et al.  Applying Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle for Laboratory Education , 2009 .

[5]  Marjorie Darrah,et al.  Are Virtual Labs as Effective as Hands-on Labs for Undergraduate Physics? A Comparative Study at Two Major Universities , 2014 .

[6]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results , 2001 .

[7]  Nicola J. Gibbons,et al.  Computer simulations improve university instructional laboratories. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[8]  Engaging students by emphasising botanical concepts over techniques: innovative practical exercises using virtual microscopy , 2013 .

[9]  Steve Flint,et al.  Food microbiology - design and testing of a virtual laboratory exercise. , 2010 .

[10]  Marissa Rollnick,et al.  Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students , 2001 .

[11]  J. Eccles,et al.  In the Mind of the Actor: The Structure of Adolescents' Achievement Task Values and Expectancy-Related Beliefs , 1995 .

[12]  Pedro J. Pardo,et al.  Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Three Learning Environments: Hyper-Realistic Virtual Simulations, Traditional Schematic Simulations and Traditional Laboratory , 2011 .

[13]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[14]  Michelle Cook Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles , 2006 .

[15]  Maria Cornelissen,et al.  Evaluation of virtual microscopy in medical histology teaching , 2013, Anatomical sciences education.

[16]  Ivan Marsic,et al.  ViBE: virtual biology experiments , 2001, WWW '01.

[17]  R. Mayer Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[18]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[19]  Alan J. Cann,et al.  Increasing Student Engagement with Practical Classes Through Online Pre-Lab Quizzes , 2016 .

[20]  Guido Makransky,et al.  Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[21]  Marthie A. M. Meester,et al.  First‐year chemistry practicals at universities in England and Wales: aims and the scientific level of the experiments , 1995 .

[22]  Chung-Ho Su,et al.  3D Game-Based Learning System for Improving Learning Achievement in Software Engineering Curriculum , 2013 .

[23]  R. Millar The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science , 2004 .

[24]  Milo Koretsky,et al.  Student Perceptions of Learning in the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories , 2011 .

[25]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1995 .

[26]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .