Structural integrity of callosal midbody influences intermanual transfer in a motor reaction‐time task

Training one hand on a motor task results in performance improvements in the other hand, also when stimuli are randomly presented (nonspecific transfer). Corpus callosum (CC) is the main structure involved in interhemispheric information transfer; CC pathology occurs in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and is related to altered performance of tasks requiring interhemispheric transfer of sensorimotor information. To investigate the role of CC in nonspecific transfer during a pure motor reaction‐time task, we combined motor behavior with diffusion tensor imaging analysis in PwMS. Twenty‐two PwMS and 10 controls, all right‐handed, were asked to respond to random stimuli with appropriate finger opposition movements with the right (learning) and then the left (transfer) hand. PwMS were able to improve motor performance reducing response times with practice with a trend similar to controls and preserved the ability to transfer the acquired motor information from the learning to the transfer hand. A higher variability in the transfer process, indicated by a significantly larger standard deviation of mean nonspecific transfer, was found in the PwMS group with respect to the control group, suggesting the presence of subtle impairments in interhemispheric communication in some patients. Then, we correlated the amount of nonspecific transfer with mean fractional anisotropy (FA) values, indicative of microstructural damage, obtained in five CC subregions identified on PwMS's FA maps. A significant correlation was found only in the subregion including posterior midbody (Pearson's r = 0.74, P = 0.003), which thus seems to be essential for the interhemispheric transfer of information related to pure sensorimotor tasks. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  E. Sullivan,et al.  Corpus callosal microstructural integrity influences interhemispheric processing: a diffusion tensor imaging study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  C. Pozzilli,et al.  Effect of corpus callosum damage on ipsilateral motor activation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A functional and anatomical study , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Marcel Kinsbourne,et al.  Asymmetrical transfer of training between hands: Implications for interhemispheric communication in normal brain , 1989, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  J. Klein,et al.  Human Motor Corpus Callosum: Topography, Somatotopy, and Link between Microstructure and Function , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  L. Leocani,et al.  Impaired Short-term Motor Learning in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence From Virtual Reality , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Preferential occult injury of corpus callosum in multiple sclerosis measured by diffusion tensor imaging , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  S. Röricht,et al.  Topography of fibers in the human corpus callosum mediating interhemispheric inhibition between the motor cortices , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[9]  T. Ptak,et al.  Investigation of apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion tensor anisotrophy in acute and chronic multiple sclerosis lesions. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[10]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Short-term adaptation to a simple motor task: A physiological process preserved in multiple sclerosis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[11]  R. Bakshi,et al.  Functional imaging during covert auditory attention in multiple sclerosis , 2004, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[12]  K. Hasan,et al.  Diffusion tensor fractional anisotropy of the normal‐appearing seven segments of the corpus callosum in healthy adults and relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis patients , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Paul M. Matthews,et al.  Loss of interhemispheric inhibition in patients with multiple sclerosis is related to corpus callosum atrophy , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  M. Poncet,et al.  Functional and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of callosal involvement in multiple sclerosis. , 1993, Archives of neurology.

[15]  J. Kurtzke.  Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.

[16]  E. Ross,et al.  Topography of the Human Corpus Callosum , 1985, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[17]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: diffusion tensor MR imaging for evaluation of normal-appearing white matter. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  M. Lassonde,et al.  Extent and limits of callosal plasticity: Presence of disconnection symptoms in callosal agenesis , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Interhemispheric Competition After Stroke: Brain Stimulation to Enhance Recovery of Function of the Affected Hand , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  M Lassonde,et al.  Callosal and cortical contribution to procedural learning. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Maura Casadio,et al.  Abnormal sensorimotor control, but intact force field adaptation, in multiple sclerosis subjects with no clinical disability , 2008, Multiple sclerosis.

[22]  N. Birbaumer.  Motor Learning: Passing a Skill from One Hand to the Other , 2007, Current Biology.

[23]  Jack H Simon,et al.  Multiple sclerosis pathology in the normal and abnormal appearing white matter of the corpus callosum by diffusion tensor imaging , 2004, Multiple sclerosis.

[24]  L. Cohen,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[25]  James H. Howard,et al.  Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  W. Brown,et al.  Callosal Function in Multiple Sclerosis: Bimanual Motor Coordination , 2002, Cortex.

[27]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Direct demonstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  Daniel T Willingham,et al.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Involved in Transfer of Procedural Knowledge , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Functional anatomy of interhemispheric cortical connections in the human brain , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited—Comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  D. Benson,et al.  Callosal disconnection in multiple sclerosis , 1993, Neurology.

[33]  Marco Rovaris,et al.  Corpus callosum damage and cognitive dysfunction in benign MS , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Mathias Wahl,et al.  The Human Motor Corpus Callosum , 2008, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[35]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  J. Doyon,et al.  Reorganization and plasticity in the adult brain during learning of motor skills , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  P. Hautecoeur,et al.  Attention impairment in recently diagnosed multiple sclerosis , 1998, European journal of neurology.

[39]  Daniel B. Willingham,et al.  Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[40]  Antonio Novellino,et al.  The effects of rate and sequence complexity on repetitive finger movements , 2007, Brain Research.

[41]  M. Molinari,et al.  Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  M Hallett,et al.  Inhibitory influence of the ipsilateral motor cortex on responses to stimulation of the human cortex and pyramidal tract , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[43]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[44]  D. Altmann,et al.  MRI measures show significant cerebellar gray matter volume loss in multiple sclerosis and are associated with cerebellar dysfunction , 2009, Multiple sclerosis.

[45]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging of adult age differences in cerebral white matter: relation to response time , 2004, NeuroImage.

[46]  S J Nelson,et al.  Mechanisms of normal appearing corpus callosum injury related to pericallosal T1 lesions in multiple sclerosis using directional diffusion tensor and 1H MRS imaging , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[47]  F. Fazekas,et al.  Impairment of movement-associated brain deactivation in multiple sclerosis: further evidence for a functional pathology of interhemispheric neuronal inhibition , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[48]  Andrea Tacchino,et al.  Callosal Contributions to Simultaneous Bimanual Finger Movements , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  Gray and white matter brain atrophy and neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Neurology.

[50]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of Somatosensory Input on Interhemispheric Interactions in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[51]  Mitchell Glickstein,et al.  Classical disconnection studies of the corpus callosum , 2008, Cortex.

[52]  M. Ghilardi,et al.  Enhancement of brain activation during trial-and-error sequence learning in early PD , 2003, Neurology.