Holistic word processing is correlated with efficiency in visual word recognition

Holistic processing of visual words (i.e., obligatory encoding of/attending to all letters of a word) could be a marker of expert word recognition. In the present study, we thus examined for the first time whether there is a direct relation between the word-composite effect (i.e., all parts of a visual word are fully processed when observers perform a task on a word part) and fast access to the orthographic lexicon by visual word experts (i.e., fluent adult readers). We adopted an individual differences approach and used the word-frequency effect (i.e., faster recognition of high- than low-frequency words) in an independent lexical decision task as a proxy of fast access to lexical orthographic representations. Fluent readers with larger word-composite effect showed smaller word-frequency effect. This correlation was mainly driven by an association between a larger composite effect and faster lexical decision on low-frequency words, probably because these lexical representations are less stable and integrated/unitized, hence allowing differentiating among fluent readers. We thus showed that holistic processing of visual words is indeed related to higher efficiency in visual word recognition by skilled readers.

[1]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift From Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing , 2011, Current directions in psychological science.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  A. Wong,et al.  Sensitivity to Configural Information and Expertise in Visual Word Recognition , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Hui Chen,et al.  Early Electrophysiological Basis of Experience-Associated Holistic Processing of Chinese Characters , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  T. Busey,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts , 2005, Vision Research.

[6]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The Inversion, Part-Whole, and Composite Effects Reflect Distinct Perceptual Mechanisms With Varied Relationships to Face Recognition , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Meanings, Mechanisms, and Measures of Holistic Processing , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Jeremy Wilmer,et al.  Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability , 2013, Cognition.

[9]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  A. Lecours,et al.  Educational level and the word frequency effect: A lexical decision investigation , 1992, Brain and Language.

[11]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[12]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Zhiheng Zhou,et al.  An fMRI study of visual hemifield integration and cerebral lateralization , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[15]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[16]  Kenneth R. Paap,et al.  Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  N. Brady,et al.  Holistic word processing in dyslexia , 2017, PloS one.

[19]  Yaoda Xu Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  B. Rossion The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception , 2013 .

[21]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Conditions for Facelike Expertise with Objects Becoming a Ziggerin Expert—but Which Type? , 2022 .

[22]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[23]  Valérie Hahn-Barma,et al.  What and Where in Word Reading: Ventral Coding of Written Words Revealed by Parietal Atrophy , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[27]  Marc N. Coutanche,et al.  Word inversion sensitivity as a marker of visual word form area lateralization: An application of a novel multivariate measure of laterality , 2019, NeuroImage.

[28]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[29]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[30]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  A mesial-to-lateral dissociation for orthographic processing in the visual cortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Exploring the relations between word frequency, language exposure, and bilingualism in a computational model of reading , 2017 .

[32]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[33]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  The nature of experience determines object representations in the visual system. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[35]  Shane T. Mueller,et al.  A note on ROC analysis and non-parametric estimate of sensitivity , 2005 .

[36]  Jennifer J. Richler,et al.  Becoming a Lunari or Taiyo expert: learned attention to parts drives holistic processing of faces. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[38]  S. Rakover Explaining the face-inversion effect: the face–scheme incompatibility (FSI) model , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[39]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[40]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[41]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[42]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Reading normal and degraded words: Contribution of the dorsal and ventral visual pathways , 2008, NeuroImage.

[43]  Assaf Harel,et al.  What is special about expertise? Visual expertise reveals the interactive nature of real-world object recognition , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[45]  Joseph W. Houpt,et al.  A new perspective on visual word processing efficiency. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[46]  Daragh E. Sibley,et al.  Individual Differences in Visual Word Recognition: Insights from the English Lexicon Project , 2012 .

[47]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  John Palmer,et al.  Parallel spatial channels converge at a bottleneck in anterior word-selective cortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Test\re-test reliability of the CANTAB and ISPOCD neuropsychological batteries: theoretical and practical issues , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Converging evidence for functional and structural segregation within the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex in reading , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Maximilian Riesenhuber,et al.  Uncovering phonological and orthographic selectivity across the reading network using fMRI-RA , 2016, NeuroImage.

[52]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  What is special about orthographic processing , 2014 .

[53]  Dan Chateau,et al.  Exposure to print and word recognition processes , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[54]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Holistic processing as a hallmark of perceptual expertise for nonface categories including Chinese characters. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[55]  Janet Hui-wen Hsiao,et al.  Transfer of Perceptual Expertise: The Case of Simplified and Traditional Chinese Character Recognition , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[56]  Paulo Ventura,et al.  Let's face it: reading acquisition, face and word processing , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[57]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Montserrat Comesaña,et al.  Psycholinguistic variables in visual word recognition and pronunciation of European Portuguese words: a mega-study approach , 2019, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.

[59]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Holistic Processing of Words Modulated by Reading Experience , 2011, PloS one.

[60]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  An fMRI-adaptation study of phonological and orthographic selectivity to written words in adults with poor reading skills , 2019, Brain and Language.

[61]  A. Young,et al.  Are We Face Experts? , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Orrin Devinsky,et al.  Sequential then Interactive Processing of Letters and Words in the Left Fusiform Gyrus , 2012, Nature Communications.

[63]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[64]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing: A ‘mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[65]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Interference in character processing reflects common perceptual expertise across writing systems. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[66]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing , 2015, Behavior research methods.

[67]  I. Gauthier,et al.  An analysis of letter expertise in a levels-of-categorization framework , 2007 .

[68]  S. Kinoshita Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[69]  Paulo Ventura,et al.  The Word Composite Effect Depends on Abstract Lexical Representations But Not Surface Features Like Case and Font , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[70]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[71]  César F. Lima,et al.  Reading strategies in orthographies of intermediate depth are flexible: Modulation of length effects in Portuguese , 2010 .

[72]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  V. Bruce,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology When Inverted Faces Are Recognized: the Role of Configural Information in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[74]  V. Kuperman,et al.  Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[75]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.