ICESat Full-Waveform Altimetry Compared to Airborne Laser Scanning Altimetry Over The Netherlands

Since 2003, the full-waveform laser altimetry system onboard NASA's Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat) has acquired a worldwide elevation database. ICESat data are widely applied for change detection of ice sheet mass balance, forest structure estimation, and digital terrain model generation of remote areas. ICESat's measurements will be continued by a follow-up mission. To fully assess the application possibilities of the full-waveform products of these missions, this research analyzes the vertical accuracy of ICESat products over complex terrain with respect to land cover type. For remote areas, validation of individual laser shots is often beyond reach. For a country with extensive geo-infrastructure such as The Netherlands, excellent countrywide validation is possible. Therefore, the ICESat full-waveform product GLA01 and the land elevation product GLA14 are compared to data from the Dutch airborne laser altimetry archive Actual Height model of the Netherlands (AHN). For a total population of 3172 waveforms, differences between ICESat- and AHN-derived terrain heights are determined. The average differences are below 25 cm over bare land and urban areas. Over forests, differences are even smaller but with slightly larger standard deviations of about 60 cm. Moreover, a waveform-based feature height comparison resulted in feature height differences of 1.89 m over forest, 1.48 m over urban areas, and 29 cm over low vegetation. These results, in combination with the presented processing chain and individual waveform examples, show that state-of-the-art ICESat waveform processing is able to analyze waveforms at the individual shot level, particularly outside urban areas.

[1]  Koichiro Doi,et al.  Combined use of InSAR and ICESat / GLAS data for high accuracy DEM generation on antarctica , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[2]  Jeffrey T. Freymueller,et al.  DEM Control in Arctic Alaska With ICESat Laser Altimetry , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  T. Rabbani,et al.  SEGMENTATION OF POINT CLOUDS USING SMOOTHNESS CONSTRAINT , 2006 .

[4]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes , 2002 .

[5]  Pavel Ditmar,et al.  Estimation of volume change rates of Greenland's ice sheet from ICESat data using overlapping footprints , 2008 .

[6]  James B. Abshire,et al.  Laser altimetry simulator. Version 3.0: User's guide , 1994 .

[7]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[8]  David J. Harding,et al.  SRTM C-band and ICESat Laser Altimetry Elevation Comparisons as a Function of Tree Cover and Relief , 2006 .

[9]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[10]  Adrian A. Borsa,et al.  Assessment of ICESat performance at the salar de Uyuni, Bolivia , 2005 .

[11]  Guoqing Sun,et al.  Landcover attributes from ICESat GLAS data in Central Siberia , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[12]  Jonathan L. Bamber,et al.  The accuracy of digital elevation models of the Antarctic continent , 2005 .

[13]  Katherine J. Quinn,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC DELAY CORRECTION TO GLAS LASER ALTIMETER RANGES , 2000 .

[14]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Operational Use of Airborne Laser Scanning for Forestry Applications in Complex Mountainous Terrain , 2007 .

[15]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat waveform measurements of within‐footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure , 2005 .

[16]  Georgia Fotopoulos,et al.  Assessment of SRTM, ICESat, and Survey Control Monument Elevations in Canada , 2007 .

[17]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat validation of SRTM C‐band digital elevation models , 2004 .

[18]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Error analysis of ICESat waveform processing by investigating overlapping pairs over Europe , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[19]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[20]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[21]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  ICESat Antarctic elevation data: Preliminary precision and accuracy assessment , 2006 .

[22]  Jorg W. Muller Possible Advantages of a Robust Evaluation of Comparisons. , 2000 .

[23]  R. Nelson,et al.  Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. , 2008 .

[24]  K. Ranson,et al.  Forest vertical structure from GLAS : An evaluation using LVIS and SRTM data , 2008 .

[25]  Gerard Hazeu,et al.  CORINE land cover database of the Netherlands: monitoring land cover changes between 1986 and 2000 , 2004 .

[26]  Erkenningscertificaat Frequently Asked Question , 2011 .

[27]  Duncan J. Wingham,et al.  A method of combining ICESat and GRACE satellite data to constrain Antarctic mass balance , 2000 .

[28]  T. A. Herring,et al.  Analysis of ICESat data using Kalman filter and kriging to study height changes in East Antarctica , 2005 .

[29]  G. Vosselman,et al.  Single and two epoch analysis of ICESat full waveform data over forested areas , 2008 .

[30]  B. E. Schutz PRECISION ORBIT DETERMINATION (POD) , 1999 .

[31]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[32]  Thorsten Markus,et al.  Detecting and measuring new snow accumulation on ice sheets by satellite remote sensing , 2005 .

[33]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Revised method for forest canopy height estimation from Geoscience Laser Altimeter System waveforms , 2007 .

[34]  B. Schutz LASER FOOTPRINT LOCATION (GEOLOCATION) AND SURFACE PROFILES , 1999 .

[35]  Ron Kwok,et al.  ICESat measurements of sea ice freeboard and estimates of sea ice thickness in the Weddell Sea , 2008 .

[36]  Alexander Braun,et al.  Verification of the Vertical Error in C-Band SRTM DEM Using ICESat and Landsat-7, Otter Tail County, MN , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[37]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  ANALYSIS OF REPEATED ICESAT FULL WAVEFORM DATA: METHODOLOGY AND LEAF-ON / LEAF-OFF COMPARISON , 2006 .

[38]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  A Survey of ICESat Coastal Altimetry Applications: Continental Coast, Open Ocean Island, and Inland River , 2008 .

[39]  Bob E. Schutz,et al.  ICESat Altimetry Data Product Verification at White Sands Space Harbor , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[40]  Nathalie Liamine,et al.  European Environment Agency , 2002 .

[41]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Vegetation height estimates for a mixed temperate forest using satellite laser altimetry , 2008 .

[42]  George Vosselman,et al.  Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraints , 2006 .

[43]  Jeffrey Miller,et al.  Comparison of ICESat Data With Airborne Laser Altimeter Measurements Over Arctic Sea Ice , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[44]  J. Blair,et al.  Modeling laser altimeter return waveforms over complex vegetation using high‐resolution elevation data , 1999 .

[45]  Sagi Filin,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for the Synthesis of Laser Altimetry Waveforms , 2000 .

[46]  Jean H. Meeus,et al.  Astronomical Algorithms , 1991 .

[47]  William B. Krabill,et al.  ICESat range and mounting bias estimation over precisely‐surveyed terrain , 2005 .

[48]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests , 2001 .