Defining and estimating causal direct and indirect effects when setting the mediator to specific values is not feasible

Natural direct and indirect effects decompose the effect of a treatment into the part that is mediated by a covariate (the mediator) and the part that is not. Their definitions rely on the concept of outcomes under treatment with the mediator 'set' to its value without treatment. Typically, the mechanism through which the mediator is set to this value is left unspecified, and in many applications, it may be challenging to fix the mediator to particular values for each unit or patient. Moreover, how one sets the mediator may affect the distribution of the outcome. This article introduces 'organic' direct and indirect effects, which can be defined and estimated without relying on setting the mediator to specific values. Organic direct and indirect effects can be applied, for example, to estimate how much of the effect of some treatments for HIV/AIDS on mother-to-child transmission of HIV infection is mediated by the effect of the treatment on the HIV viral load in the blood of the mother. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects , 2001, UAI.

[2]  Stephen R Cole,et al.  The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption? , 2009, Epidemiology.

[3]  A. Dawid.  Conditional Independence in Statistical Theory , 1979 .

[4]  J L Sullivan,et al.  Maternal viral load, zidovudine treatment, and the risk of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from mother to infant. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. Pearl.  Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[6]  Ilya Shpitser,et al.  Semiparametric Theory for Causal Mediation Analysis: efficiency bounds, multiple robustness, and sensitivity analysis. , 2012, Annals of statistics.

[7]  Tyler J VanderWeele,et al.  A three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects. , 2013, Epidemiology.

[8]  J. Robins,et al.  G-Estimation of the Effect of Prophylaxis Therapy for Pneumocystis carinii Pneumonia on the Survival of AIDS Patients , 1992, Epidemiology.

[9]  Ashley I Naimi,et al.  Stochastic mediation contrasts in epidemiologic research: interpregnancy interval and the educational disparity in preterm delivery. , 2014, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Tyler J. VanderWeele,et al.  Marginal Structural Models for the Estimation of Direct and Indirect Effects , 2009, Epidemiology.

[11]  L. Keele,et al.  Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects , 2010, 1011.1079.

[12]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  On causal mediation analysis with a survival outcome. , 2011 .

[14]  Linda Valeri,et al.  Mediation analysis allowing for exposure-mediator interactions and causal interpretation: theoretical assumptions and implementation with SAS and SPSS macros. , 2013, Psychological methods.

[15]  A. Philip Dawid,et al.  Direct and Indirect Effects of Sequential Treatments , 2006, UAI.

[16]  S. Geneletti.  Identifying direct and indirect effects in a non‐counterfactual framework , 2007 .

[17]  J. Robins,et al.  Identifiability and Exchangeability for Direct and Indirect Effects , 1992, Epidemiology.

[18]  J. Pearl.  The Mediation Formula: A Guide to the Assessment of Causal Pathways in Nonlinear Models , 2011 .

[19]  James M. Robins,et al.  Effect decomposition in the presence of an exposure-induced mediator-outcome confounder. , 2014, Epidemiology.

[20]  M. Hernán,et al.  The birth weight "paradox" uncovered? , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen,et al.  On Causal Mediation Analysis with a Survival Outcome , 2011, The international journal of biostatistics.