Properties and simplifications of constitutive time‐discretized elastoplastic operators

In the paper, a general constitutive elastoplastic model for associated plasticity is investigated. The model is based on the thermodynamical framework with internal variables and can include basic plastic criteria with a combination of kinematic hardening and non-linear isotropic hardening. The corresponding initial value constitutive elastoplastic problem is discretized by the implicit Euler method. The discretized one-time-step constitutive problem defines the elastoplastic operator, which is formulated by a simple generalization of a projection onto a convex set. Properties of the so-called generalized projection are used for deriving basic properties of the elastoplastic operator like potentiality, monotonicity, Lipschitz continuity and local semismoothness. Further, hardening variables are eliminated from the projective definition of the elastoplastic operators, which yields relations among the models with hardening variables and the perfect plasticity model. Also a simplification of the operator for plastic criteria in eigenvalue forms is introduced. The simplifications are useful for a numerical implementation and can be used for deriving other properties like strong semismoothness of the elastoplastic operators for the classical plastic criteria or strong monotonicity of the stress-strain operator for some models with hardening. The derived properties can be important for convergence analyses of Newton-like methods and other mathematical and numerical analyses.

[1]  Defeng Sun,et al.  A further result on an implicit function theorem for locally Lipschitz functions , 2001, Oper. Res. Lett..

[2]  Jan Valdman,et al.  Solution of One-Time-Step Problems in Elastoplasticity by a Slant Newton Method , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Donald E. Carlson,et al.  The derivative of a tensor-valued function of a tensor , 1986 .

[4]  Radim Blaheta,et al.  Convergence of Newton-type methods in incremental return mapping analysis of elasto-plastic problems , 1997 .

[5]  R. Mifflin Semismooth and Semiconvex Functions in Constrained Optimization , 1977 .

[6]  Mark Goh,et al.  On the Semismoothness of Projection Mappings and Maximum Eigenvalue Functions , 2006, J. Glob. Optim..

[7]  John M. Ball,et al.  Differentiability properties of symmetric and isotropic functions , 1984 .

[8]  Liqun Qi,et al.  A nonsmooth version of Newton's method , 1993, Math. Program..

[9]  Stanislav Sysala Application of a modified semismooth Newton method to some elasto-plastic problems , 2012, Math. Comput. Simul..

[10]  Bernd Kummer An implicit-function theorem for C0, 1-equations and parametric C1, 1-optimization , 1991 .

[11]  Defeng Sun,et al.  Semismooth Homeomorphisms and Strong Stability of Semidefinite and Lorentz Complementarity Problems , 2003, Math. Oper. Res..

[12]  Defeng Sun,et al.  Semismoothness of solutions to generalized equations and the Moreau-Yosida regularization , 2005, Math. Program..

[13]  Christian Wieners,et al.  On the superlinear convergence in computational elasto-plasticity , 2011 .

[14]  Alexander Mielke,et al.  Quasi-Static Small-Strain Plasticity in the Limit of Vanishing Hardening and Its Numerical Approximation , 2012, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[15]  Carsten Carstensen,et al.  Elastoviscoplastic Finite Element analysis in 100 lines of Matlab , 2002, J. Num. Math..

[16]  M. Seetharama Gowda,et al.  Inverse and implicit function theorems for H-differentiable and semismooth functions , 2004, Optim. Methods Softw..

[17]  J. Moreau Proximité et dualité dans un espace hilbertien , 1965 .