A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare

Farm animal welfare (FAW) concerns have prompted scientific research, development and standard setting (especially in the EU and USA) having ethical, production, economic, social, cultural and trade implications. We meta-analyse the literature on consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for FAW, examining 24 studies reporting 106 estimates of consumer FAW values. Meta-regressions indicate that respondent income and age significantly affect WTP, substantial geographical disparities are unsupported, information provision about farm animal living conditions significantly alters WTP estimates and suggestions that FAW be legislatively required significantly reduce WTP. We conclude that the public good aspect of FAW merits further investigation. Oxford University Press and Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics 2010; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email journals.permissions@oup.com, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Tommy Stanley,et al.  Beyond Publication Bias , 2005 .

[2]  R. Bennett.  THE VALUE OF FARM ANIMAL WELFARE , 1995 .

[3]  Jutta Roosen,et al.  Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States , 2003 .

[4]  I. Veissier,et al.  European approaches to ensure good animal welfare , 2008 .

[5]  R. Bennett,et al.  Consumption of welfare-friendly food products in Great Britain, Italy and Sweden, and how it may be influenced by consumer attitudes to, and behaviour towards, animal welfare attributes , 2007 .

[6]  Yves Croissant,et al.  Panel data econometrics in R: The plm package , 2008 .

[7]  G. Houtven.  Methods for the Meta-Analysis of Willingness-to-Pay Data , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[8]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Consumer Benefits of Labels and Bans on GM Foods—Choice Experiments with Swedish Consumers , 2007 .

[9]  J. MacKinnon,et al.  Several Tests for Model Specication in the Pres-ence of Alternative Hypotheses , 1981 .

[10]  J. Amikuzuno,et al.  The Contribution of Agricultural Economics to Price transmission Analysis and Market Policy in Sub-Sahara Africa: What Does the Literature Say? , 2012 .

[11]  Jeffrey S. Racine,et al.  Nonparametric Econometrics: The np Package , 2008 .

[12]  G. Hutchinson,et al.  Measuring the value to the public of pig welfare improvements: a contingent valuation approach , 2005, Animal Welfare.

[13]  F. Norwood,et al.  Consumer Demand for a Ban on Antibiotic Drug Use in Pork Production , 2006 .

[14]  R. Bennett,et al.  Moral Intensity and Willingness to Pay Concerning Farm Animal Welfare Issues and the Implications for Agricultural Policy , 2002 .

[15]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Meta-Analysis in Marketing when Studies Contain Multiple Measurements , 2001 .

[16]  M. Heinonen,et al.  Market and policy-oriented incentives to provide animal welfare: The case of tail biting , 2012 .

[17]  Randall S. Rosenberger,et al.  Selection Effects in Meta-Analysis and Benefit Transfer: Avoiding Unintended Consequences , 2009, Land Economics.

[18]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter , 2007 .

[19]  Bettina Bock,et al.  Animal Welfare: the attitudes and behaviour of European pig farmers , 2007 .

[20]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Farm Animal Welfare—Testing for Market Failure , 2007, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[21]  A. Abdulai,et al.  A meta-analysis of the response of calorie demand to income changes , 2012 .

[22]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Swedish Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare and Biotech: A Choice Experiment , 2006 .

[23]  M. J. Harrison,et al.  A Test for Heteroscedasticity Based on Ordinary Least Squares Residuals , 1979 .

[24]  Louise Manning,et al.  Quality assurance models in the food supply chain , 2006 .

[25]  Linda J. Keeling,et al.  Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare , 2007, Animal Welfare.

[26]  J. Lusk,et al.  Consumer Demand for Mandatory Labeling of Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn , 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[27]  R. Bennett,et al.  Social consensus, moral intensity and willingness to pay to address a farm animal welfare issue , 2002 .

[28]  Richard Bennett,et al.  CONTINGENT VALUATION OF THE PERCEIVED BENEFITS OF FARM ANIMAL WELFARE LEGISLATION: AN EXPLORATORY SURVEY , 1996 .

[29]  L. Z. Bakucs,et al.  What causes asymmetric price transmission in agro-food sector? : meta-analysis perspective , 2012 .

[30]  Carolina Liljenstolpe.  Evaluating animal welfare with choice experiments: an application to Swedish pig production , 2005 .

[31]  Carl Johan Lagerkvist,et al.  Using cheap talk as a test of validity in choice experiments , 2005 .

[32]  C. Donnelly,et al.  Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density , 2004, Nature.

[33]  G. Tonsor,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates , 2009, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[34]  D. Moran,et al.  Estimation of the value the public places on regulations to improve broiler welfare , 2008, Animal Welfare.

[35]  T. Stanley,et al.  Wheat from Chaff: Meta-Analysis as Quantitative Literature Review: Response , 2001 .

[36]  Richard Bennett,et al.  Farm animal welfare and food policy , 1997 .

[37]  F. Carlsson,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Food Product Quality Attributes from Swedish Agriculture , 2005, Ambio.

[38]  J. Rolfe.  Ethical Rules and the Demand for Free Range Eggs , 1999 .