Does Foreign Aid Really Work? An Updated Assessment

This paper draws widely from the book Does foreign aid really work?, building on that discussion to provide an updated answer to the question based on recent evidence and contemporary debates on aid effectiveness.It starts with a brief discussion (Section 2) of the question: ‘does emergency aid work?’ This is important to the wider debate for two linked reasons. Firstly, the harshest critics of development aid are all supportive of emergency aid, with a number calling for its expansion in spite of evidence of major weaknesses and failures. Secondly, the sharp historical distinction made between emergency and development aid is becoming increasingly strained, as more emergency aid is being used a year or more after emergencies strike to rebuild lives and restore livelihoods, while more development aid is used to directly save lives.The rest of the paper focuses exclusively on development aid. Section 3 provides a rapid overview of the evidence of the impact of individual aid projects, including those of Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs). The picture is overwhelmingly positive: well over 75% of projects meet their immediate objectives and impact has improved, even though sustaining benefits remains a challenge and there continue to be aid failures.Section 4 reviews the evidence of the wider and long-term impact of aid at the sectoral and country level, including a brief discussion of academic studies on aid and growth. Though there are still major gaps in our knowledge, the quality of the data is improving. However, there is little firm, quantitative evidence to show the specific contribution that aid has made to help achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which are a central purpose of many current donor programmes (Section 4.2). More widely, there is plenty of evidence to suggest that aid has contributed positively to both growth and wider development at the sector and country level, though some studies suggest aid has had little or no impact. Overall, the contribution that aid makes to aggregate development is lower than the public has been led to believe (Sections 4.1, 4.3. and 4.4). Assessments of the overall impact of the aid provided by NGOs are rare, but a recent study suggests it has been positive (Section 4.5). More attention is now given to the issues of corruption in aid. Although there is evidence of aid funds being used for corrupt purposes and of aid worsening corruption, on balance it remains a minor issue. Aid has had significant successes in helping the poor affected by corruption (Section 4.6).The second half of the paper shifts focus to the large gap between what aid has done and what it might do. Section 5 discusses a range of inefficiencies within and across the aid system and their costs in terms of reduced impact, including the way aid is allocated, its growing complexity, and the volatility and unpredictability of aid flows (Section 5.1 and 5.2). These inefficiencies place in a different light the evidence of aid’s overall positive impact. The paper looks at the different initiatives that have been mounted to begin to address these weaknesses and failures, including the 2005 Paris Declaration, and discusses why donors have failed to honour the promises they have made to change the ways that they give aid.In Section 5.3, the paper argues that the most critical debate about whether aid works concerns the assessment of whether the short-term, immediate and extensive benefits that aid undoubtedly brings are outweighed by the direct and indirect systemic problems that it risks creating or accentuating. As increasingly over the last decade donors have channelled more of their aid into short-term, quick-impact projects, assessing the wider negative systemic effects of aid has become even more important. Some recent studies suggest that aid’s systemic problems are large and growing, narrowing the gap between aid’s harshest critics and broader analyses of aid impact.Against the backdrop of already too many proposals of how to make aid work better, Section 6 lays out nine concrete proposals for doing this: deepening knowledge of local contexts; ensuring short-term uses of aid are consistent with and supportive of long-term development, and that all aid is more closely related to overall recipient development goals and processes; helping build local capacities for recipients to be able to coordinate aid better; moving from rhetoric to reality in learning lessons from aid; using aid to help the poor in middle income countries; reducing volatility in aid at the country level; encouraging budget support by addressing donor-country political concerns; and rethinking ways of communicating about aid.Section 7 concludes. It suggests that, paradoxically, aid’s impact may well have been harmed by focussing too narrowly on trying to make short-term aid work better, and that the main focus of attention needs to widen to assess how aid can contribute more to a recipient’s own development goals. Additionally, donors need to help build the capacity of developing countries and developing country scholars to enable them to play a bigger role in helping to answer the question of whether aid works; unsettling though their assessments may be.

[1]  Chris Roche,et al.  Impact Assessment for Development Agencies , 1999 .

[2]  Oliver S. Saasa,et al.  The Developmental Effectiveness of Untied Aid: Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration and of the 2001 DAC Recommendation on untying ODA to LDCs , 2009 .

[3]  Roger C. Riddell,et al.  Does Foreign Aid Really Work , 2007 .

[4]  Diana Baader Does Aid Work , 2016 .

[5]  Synne Movik The Politics of Aid: African Strategies for Dealing with Donors , 2011 .

[6]  D. Booth Facilitating develoment an arm's length approach to aid , 2013 .

[7]  Sven E. Wilson Chasing Success: Health Sector Aid and Mortality , 2011 .

[8]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Aid and Trust in Country Systems , 2009 .

[9]  R. Picciotto Development Effectiveness at the Country Level , 2007 .

[10]  Paul Collier,et al.  Aid Allocation and Poverty Reduction , 1999 .

[11]  J. Putzel Do no harm: international support for statebuilding , 2010 .

[12]  A. Nilsdotter,et al.  Are Sida Evaluations Good Enough? : An Assessment of 34 Evaluation Reports , 2008 .

[13]  Michael A. Clemens,et al.  Counting Chickens When They Hatch: Timing and the Effects of Aid on Growth , 2012 .

[14]  A. Sumner Global poverty, aid, and middle-income countries Are the country classifications moribund or is global poverty in the process of 'nationalizing'? , 2013 .

[15]  M. Lawson Foreign Aid: International Donor Coordination of Development Assistance , 2013 .

[16]  Laurence Cockcroft Global Corruption: Money, Power, and Ethics in the Modern World , 2012 .

[17]  A. Natsios The Clash of the Counter-bureaucracy and Development , 2010 .

[18]  Michael Woolcock,et al.  Toward a plurality of methods in project evaluation: a contextualised approach to understanding impact trajectories and efficacy , 2009 .

[19]  Fm Mwega,et al.  A Case Study of Aid Effectiveness in Kenya: Volatility and Fragmentation of Foreign Aid, with a Focus on Health , 2009 .

[20]  Daniel A. Kaufmann,et al.  Good Countries or Good Projects? Macro and Micro Correlates of World Bank Project Performance , 2011 .

[21]  Philippe Le Houérou,et al.  Aid architecture : an overview of the main trends in official development assistance flows , 2008 .

[22]  N. Woods The Shifting Politics of Foreign Aid , 2005 .

[23]  O. Barder Is aid a waste of money , 2014 .

[24]  Adam McCarty,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENTAL EFFECTIVENESS OF UNTIED AID: EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PARIS DECLARATION AND OF THE 2001 DAC RECOMMENDATION ON UNTYING ODA TO THE LDCS , 2009 .

[25]  C. Kenny,et al.  More Money or More Development: What Have the MDGs Achieved? , 2011 .

[26]  James P. Ziliak Program Evaluation Using Multidimensional Poverty Measures : Evidence from TUP , 2010 .

[27]  Thomas Carothers,et al.  Development Aid Confronts Politics: The Almost Revolution , 2013 .

[28]  Michael A. Clemens,et al.  The Trouble with the MDGS: Confronting Expectations of Aid and Development Success , 2004 .

[29]  L. Ndikumana The Private Sector as Culprit and Victim of Corruption in Africa , 2013 .

[30]  R. Riddell Assessing the Overall Impact of Civil Society on Development at the Country Level: An Exploratory Approach , 2013 .

[31]  B. Ramalingam Learning how to learn : eight lessons for impact evaluations that make a difference Background Note April 2011 , 2011 .

[32]  Nobuo Yoshida,et al.  Is Extreme Poverty Going to End? An Analytical Framework to Evaluate Progress in Ending Extreme Poverty , 2014 .

[33]  Matt Andrews,et al.  The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development , 2013 .

[34]  Eskander Alvi,et al.  DOES FOREIGN AID REDUCE POVERTY , 2012 .

[35]  Burkina Faso Evaluation of General Budget Support: Synthesis Report , 2006 .

[36]  Jan P. Pronk,et al.  Catalysing Development?: A Debate on Aid , 2004 .

[37]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation , 2013 .

[38]  Johansein Rutaihwa Joint Evaluation of Budget Support to Tanzania: lessons learned and recommendations for the future Final Report: Volume 1 2013(Link) , 2013 .

[39]  Eva-Karin Olsson Botswana : An African success story? , 1996 .

[40]  Channing Arndt,et al.  Aid and Development: The Mozambican Case , 2007 .

[41]  C. Kenny The Great Escape: health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality , 2013 .

[42]  Homi Kharas Trends and Issues in Development Aid , 2007 .

[43]  L. E. Wa-ku-Mikishi,et al.  Dead aid: why aid is not working and how there is another way for Africa , 2010 .

[44]  Andrew McNee Rethinking Health Sector Wide Approaches Through the Lens of Aid Effectiveness , 2012 .

[45]  Ivar Kolstad,et al.  Corruption, Anti-corruption Efforts and Aid: Do Donors Have the Right Approach? , 2008 .

[46]  Tobias Pfutze,et al.  Where Does the Money Go? Best and Worst Practices in Foreign Aid , 2008 .

[47]  J. Meerman The Effectiveness of Foreign Aid , 1972, The Journal of Modern African Studies.

[48]  C. Arndt,et al.  Assessing Foreign Aid's Long-Run Contribution to Growth in Development , 2015 .

[49]  Ek Chanboreth,et al.  Aid Effectiveness in Cambodia , 2015 .

[50]  Matthew Morris,et al.  Beyond Paris: 11 Innovations in Aid Effectiveness , 2011 .

[51]  Mark McGillivray,et al.  Long-term Swedish development co-operation with Sri Lanka, Vietnam and Laos : synthesis of evaluation study findings , 2012 .

[52]  D. Booth Aid effectiveness: bringing country ownership (and politics) back in , 2012 .

[53]  M. McGillivray,et al.  Does Aid Work for the Poor , 2011 .

[54]  F. Sagasti,et al.  The Future of Development Financing , 2005 .

[55]  Paul Mosley,et al.  Aid-effectiveness: The Micro-Macro Paradox , 1986 .

[56]  David Roodman,et al.  Macro Aid Effectiveness Research: A Guide for the Perplexed , 2007 .

[57]  Rustam Aminjanov,et al.  Case Study on AID Effectiveness in Tajikistan , 2016 .

[58]  Stewart Patrick,et al.  The Pentagon and Global Development: Making Sense of the DoD's Expanding Role , 2007 .

[59]  P Bauer,et al.  Foreign aid: what is at stake? , 1982 .

[60]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Microcredit Under the Microscope: What Have We Learned in the Past Two Decades, and What Do We Need to Know? , 2013 .

[61]  S. Adhikari,et al.  NEPAL'S STORY Understanding improvements in maternal health , 2013 .

[62]  I. Jelovac,et al.  How Should Donors Give Foreign Aid? Project Aid Versus Budget Support , 2008 .

[63]  Paul Mosley,et al.  Overseas aid : its defence and reform , 1987 .

[64]  Admos O. Chimhowu,et al.  Aid for agriculture and rural development in the global south: A changing landscape with new players and challenges , 2013 .

[65]  J. Copestake,et al.  What is the impact of microfinance, and what does this imply for microfinance policy and for future impact studies? , 2011 .