Breeding for improved drought tolerance in maize adapted to southern Africa

The difficulty of choosing appropriate selection environments has restricted breeding progress for drought tolerance in highly-variable target environments. Genotype-by-environment interactions in southern African maize-growing environments result from factors related to maximum temperature, seasonal rainfall, season length, within season drought, subsoil pH and socio-economic factors that result in suboptimal input application. In 1997 CIMMYT initiated a product-oriented breeding program targeted at improving maize for the drought-prone mid-altitudes of southern Africa. Maize varieties were selected in Zimbabwe using simultaneous selection in three types of environments, (i) recommended agronomic management/high rainfall conditions, (ii) low N stress, and (iii) managed drought. Between 2000 and 2002, 41 hybrids from this approach were compared with 42 released and prereleased hybrids produced by private seed companies in 36-65 trials across eastern and southern Africa. Average trial yields ranged from less than 1 t/ha to above 10 t/ha. Hybrids from CIMMYT’s stress breeding program showed a consistent advantage over private company check hybrids at all yield levels. Selection differentials were largest between 2 to 5 t/ha and they became less significant at higher yield levels. An Eberhart-Russell stability analysis estimated a 40% yield advantage at the 1-ton yield level which decreased to 2.5% at the 10-ton yield level. We conclude that including selection under carefully managed high priority abiotic stresses, including drought, in a breeding program and with adequate weighing can significantly increase maize yields in a highly variable drought-prone environment and particularly at lower yield levels.

[1]  K. Frey Adaptation Reaction of Oat Strains Selected Under Stress and Non-Stress Environmental Conditions 1 , 1964 .

[2]  W. A. Russell,et al.  Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties , 1966 .

[3]  A. Hallauer,et al.  Mass Selection for Yield in Two Varieties of Maize 1 , 1969 .

[4]  A. Blum Genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants: a case for sorghum , 1979 .

[5]  R. Kohel,et al.  Effectiveness of Selection in Upland Cotton in Stress Environments 1 , 1980 .

[6]  A. Rosielle,et al.  Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-Stress Environment 1 , 1981 .

[7]  A. Rathjen,et al.  Choosing trial sites to maximize selection response for grain yield in spring wheat , 1981 .

[8]  R. M. Castleberry,et al.  Genetic Yield Improvement of U.S. Maize Cultivars under Varying Fertility and Climatic Environments1 , 1984 .

[9]  S. Johnson,et al.  Influence of water stress on grain yield response to recurrent selection in maize , 1989 .

[10]  H. Lafitte,et al.  Traditional approaches to breeding for drought resistance in cereals. , 1989 .

[11]  G. Atlin,et al.  Selecting oat lines for yield in low-productivity environments , 1990 .

[12]  D. Andrews,et al.  Increasing the Efficiency of Crop Selection for Unpredictable Environments , 1992 .

[13]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[14]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior , 1993 .

[15]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization , 1993 .

[16]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Physiological Basis of the Genetic Improvement of Corn , 1994 .

[17]  P. Byrne,et al.  Gains from Selection under Drought versus Multilocation Testing in Related Tropical Maize Populations , 1995 .

[18]  Kaye E. Basford,et al.  Retrospective analysis of historical data sets from multi-environment trials - theoretical development. , 1996 .

[19]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Efficiency of high-nitrogen selection environments for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments , 1997 .

[20]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Grain Yield is Reduced More by Weed Interference in an Old than in a New Maize Hybrid , 1997 .

[21]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Efficiency of Secondary Traits for Improving Maize for Low‐Nitrogen Target Environments , 1997 .

[22]  S. Fukai,et al.  Combining information from multi-environment trials and molecular markers to select adaptive traits for yield improvement of rice in water-limited environments , 1999 .

[23]  Kaye E. Basford,et al.  Computer simulation of a selection strategy to accommodate genotype environment interactions in a wheat recurrent selection programme , 1999 .

[24]  Marianne Bänziger,et al.  Selection for drought tolerance increases maize yields across a range of nitrogen levels , 1999 .

[25]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: I. Gains in Biomass, Grain Yield, and Harvest Index , 1999 .

[26]  S. Fukai,et al.  Screening for drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice , 1999 .

[27]  W. Link,et al.  Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Vicia faba , 1999 .

[28]  D. Duvick,et al.  Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States , 1999 .

[29]  D. Taleghani,et al.  Genetic variation for drought stress in sugarbeet. , 2000 .

[30]  J. Nyamangara,et al.  Soil Fertility Status in the Communal Areas of Zimbabwe in Relation to Sustainable Crop Production , 2000 .

[31]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Breeding for drought and nitrogen stress tolerance in maize: From theory to practice , 2000 .

[32]  Villaseñor Mir Outline of the wheat breeding program for rainfed areas in Mexico. , 2000 .

[33]  A. Tarekegne,et al.  Characterization of maize germplasm grown in Eastern and Southern Africa: Results of the 2000 regional trials coordinated by CIMMYT , 2001 .

[34]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Selection of Barley Lines for Drought Tolerance in Low-Rainfall Areas , 2001 .

[35]  V. Moda‐Cirino,et al.  Response of common bean cultivars and lines to water stress , 2001 .

[36]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Physiological mechanisms contributing to the increased N stress tolerance of tropical maize selected for drought tolerance , 2002 .

[37]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Collaborative maize variety development for stress-prone environments in southern Africa. , 2002 .

[38]  O. P. Yadav,et al.  Genetic variation in drought response of landraces of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] , 2003 .

[39]  S. Ceccarelli,et al.  Relationship between barley grain yield measured in low- and high-yielding environments , 2004, Euphytica.

[40]  B. Kobiljski,et al.  Evaluation of grain yield and its components in wheat cultivars and landraces under near optimal and drought conditions , 2000, Euphytica.

[41]  Marianne Bänziger,et al.  Breeding for low input conditions and consequences for participatory plant breeding examples from tropical maize and wheat , 2004, Euphytica.

[42]  W. A. Compton,et al.  Differential response of maize (Zea mays L.) to mass selection in diverse selection environments , 2004, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[43]  B. Carver,et al.  Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments , 2004, Euphytica.