REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR PAPER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (DOUBLE-CLICK <

We present a new method for routing MAC frames at layer 2 (L2) within an 802.11 MANET. The new method, Multihop Clear Channel Assessment (MCCA), improves on the RTS/CTS mechanism used in the 802.11 DCF by extending it from a single hop protocol to a multihop one. Such an approach can, in some circumstances, eliminate the need for a routing protocol at layer 3 (L3), since frames, instead of being routed at L3, are forwarded from node to node across multiple hops at L2. This can yield considerable performance improvements due to the absence of additional routing traffic and processing at L3, especially under highly mobile scenarios. We review the results obtained by implementing MCCA using the NS3 network simulator with suitably modified 802.11 source code. We analyze static and mobile ad hoc network scenarios using MCCA when compared to a L3 routing protocol such as Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) and Ad hoc On demand Distance Vector (AODV). Using NS3, we ultimately demonstrate that in certain scenarios, MCCA at L2, vs a L3 routing protocol, indicates significant improvements in key MANET performance metrics such as Quality of Service (QoS), average latency, packet delivery ratio and device power consumption.

[1]  Giuseppe Bianchi,et al.  Multiple-path layer-2 based routing and load balancing approach for wireless infrastructure mesh networks , 2006, CoNEXT '06.

[2]  Chen-Nee Chuah,et al.  WDS-based layer 2 routing for wireless mesh networks , 2006, WINTECH.

[3]  Marco Conti,et al.  Mobile Ad-hoc Networking - Minitrack Introduction , 2001, HICSS.

[4]  David B. Johnson,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2003 .

[5]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations , 1999, RFC.

[6]  Somprakash Bandyopadhyay,et al.  A network-aware MAC and routing protocol for effective load balancing in ad hoc wireless networks with directional antenna , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[7]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[8]  David A. Maltz,et al.  Dynamic Source Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 1994, Mobidata.

[9]  Mohamed Ould-Khaoua,et al.  Performance Analysis of MANET Routing Protocols in the Presence of Self-Similar Traffic , 2006, Proceedings. 2006 31st IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[10]  A. Laouiti,et al.  Optimized link state routing protocol for ad hoc networks , 2001, Proceedings. IEEE International Multi Topic Conference, 2001. IEEE INMIC 2001. Technology for the 21st Century..

[11]  Philippe Jacquet,et al.  Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR) , 2003, RFC.

[12]  Nitin H. Vaidya,et al.  MAC-layer anycasting in ad hoc networks , 2004, Comput. Commun. Rev..

[13]  JoAnne Holliday,et al.  MCCA: Multihop Clear Channel Assessment In 802.11 DCF , 2010, 2010 7th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference.

[14]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Carbon nanotube-based nanoscale ad hoc networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[15]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.