An Essay on Research Methodology: An Alternative Approach to Incident Command Research Through Participatory Action Research

Current incident command research faces several challenges. The incident commander's behaviour and related assessments in the crisis response are context bound, and our understanding of these factors requires close awareness of the context. Reconstruction of the on-scene behaviour encompassing situation awareness and cognitive reasoning is difficult. There is a need to develop better understanding of decision-making in crisis settings and methods for rigorous observation and knowledge elicitation. In order to understand the importance and actual influence of incident commanding, the researchers need to assess the response in real time, not only based on studying logs etc. afterwards. Participatory action research provides ideas in which the researcher, besides being an observer, would be involved in the rescue work. This raises ethical questions, but there is a need for naturalistic decision-making research to evolve beyond descriptive models.

[1]  Sandra Mathison,et al.  Rethinking the evaluator role: Partnerships between organizations and evaluators , 1994 .

[2]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Investigating Risk, Organisations and Decision Support through Action Research , 2002 .

[3]  E. Burke,et al.  Decision making on the London incident ground: an exploratory study , 1997 .

[4]  Brian Skyrms,et al.  Science And Subjectivity , 1967 .

[5]  Thomas E. Drabek,et al.  Following Some Dreams: Recognizing Opportunities, Posing Interesting Questions, and Implementing Alternative Methods , 1997, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[6]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[7]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Decision Management: How to Assure Better Decisions in Your Company , 2003 .

[8]  E. Banfield.  Ends and Means in Planning , 1985 .

[9]  Nezih Altay,et al.  OR/MS research in disaster operations management , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[11]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Information in Communicative Planning , 1998 .

[12]  Simon French,et al.  Design and evaluation of an intelligent decision support system for nuclear emergencies , 2005, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Gary Klein,et al.  Working Minds: A Practitioner's Guide to Cognitive Task Analysis , 2006 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[15]  R. McTaggart.  Participatory Action Research: International Contexts and Consequences. , 1997 .

[16]  Larry A. Pace,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[17]  Magnus Morin,et al.  Mission efficiency analysis: evaluating and improving tactical mission performance in high-risk, time-critical operations , 1998 .

[18]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  T. Connolly,et al.  The reinvention of decision making. , 1993 .

[20]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[21]  L. Comfort,et al.  Managing Crises: Threats, Dilemmas, Opportunities , 2001 .

[22]  Eivind L. Rake,et al.  Emergency management and decision making on accident scenes: taxonomy, models and future research , 2003 .

[23]  W. Whyte,et al.  Participatory Action Research , 1989 .

[24]  Laura Nichols,et al.  Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators , 2002 .

[25]  Penelope Maddy,et al.  The logical structure of the world , 2007 .

[26]  James P Dobbins,et al.  Development of a GIS-based spill management information system. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[27]  C. Vaught,et al.  Judgment and decision making under stress: an overview for emergency managers , 2003 .

[28]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Rudolf Carnap,et al.  The logical structure of the world & pseudoproblems in philosophy , 1967 .

[30]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  L. Barnett.  Sitting in the Hot Seat: Some Thoughts from the Reference Chair , 1997 .

[32]  P. Healey.  Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory , 1992 .

[33]  P. Jones.  Making Decisions , 1971, Nature.

[34]  L. Donaldson,et al.  Coping with Crises: The Management of Disasters, Riots and Terrorism , 1989 .

[35]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Command and Control in Policing: A Systems Assessment of the Gold, Silver and Bronze Structure , 1995 .

[36]  Gilles Dusserre,et al.  OSIRIS: software for the consequence evaluation of transportation of dangerous goods accidents , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[37]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research , 2006 .

[38]  G. Klein,et al.  A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. , 1993 .

[39]  Huey-tsyh Chen.  Emerging Perspectives in Program Evaluation , 1993 .

[40]  E. L. Quarantelli,et al.  The Disaster Research Center Field Studies of Organized Behavior in the Crisis Time Period of Disasters , 1997, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[41]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[42]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared , 1989 .

[43]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[44]  G. Klein,et al.  Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods , 1993 .

[45]  J. Cunningham,et al.  Case study principles for different types of cases , 1997 .

[46]  Toby Diane Ayers,et al.  Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach☆☆☆ , 1987 .

[47]  Eivind L. Rake,et al.  A Risk — Informed Approach to Decision Making in Rescue Operations , 2004 .

[48]  A. Beringer,et al.  to action research , 2022 .

[49]  Tom Schuller,et al.  Democracy at Work , 1985 .

[50]  Roberta Calderwood,et al.  Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[51]  Rhona H. Flin.  Sitting in the Hot Seat: Leaders and Teams for Critical Incident Management , 1996 .

[52]  Lars C. Kolberg.  Case Studies and Generalization , 2004 .

[53]  B. Brehmer.  Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[54]  F. C. P. Motta.  The theory of communicative action , 1991 .

[55]  Geary W. Sikich.  Emergency Management Planning Handbook , 1995 .

[56]  P. Feyerabend.  Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge , 1976 .

[57]  A McElroy,et al.  The assessment and management of self-harming patients in an accident and emergency department: an action research project. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[58]  S. Cotgrove,et al.  Risk and rationality , 1982, Nature.

[59]  T. Aven.  Foundations of risk analysis , 2003 .

[60]  L. Rispel,et al.  From conflict to cohesion: Involving stakeholders in policy research , 1995 .

[61]  Vikas Singh,et al.  National Incident Management System , 2007 .

[62]  David Mendonça,et al.  Designing gaming simulations for the assessment of group decision support systems in emergency response , 2006 .

[63]  Preben H. Lindøe,et al.  Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles , 2004 .