Implications of Deep Electrode Insertion on Cochlear Implant Fitting

Using long Med-El Combi40+ electrode arrays, it is now possible to cover the whole range of the cochlea, up to about two turns. Such insertion depths have received little attention. To evaluate the contribution of deeply inserted electrodes, five Med-El cochlear implant users were tested on vowel and consonant identification tests with fittings with first one, two, and up to five apical electrodes being deactivated. In addition, subjects performed pitch-ranking experiments, using loudness-balanced stimuli, to identify electrodes creating pitch confusions. Radiographs were taken to measure each electrode insertion depth. All subjects used each modified fitting for two periods of about 3 weeks. During the experiment, the same stimulation rate and frequency range were maintained across all the fittings used for each individual subject. After each trial period the subject had to perform three consonant and three vowel identification tests. All subjects showed deep electrode insertions ranging from 605° to 720°. The two subjects with the deepest electrode insertions showed significantly increased vowel- and consonant-identification performances with fittings with the two or three most apical electrodes deactivated compared to their standard fitting with all available electrodes activated. The other three subjects did not show significant improvements in performance when one or two of their most apical electrodes were deactivated. Four out of five subjects preferred to continue use of a fitting with one or more apical electrodes deactivated. The two subjects with the deepest insertions also showed pitch confusions between their most apical electrodes. Two possible reasons for these results are discussed. One is to reduce neural interactions related to electrodes producing pitch confusions. Another is to improve the alignment of the frequency components of sounds coded by the electrical signals delivered to each electrode to the overall pitch of the auditory perception produced by the electrical stimulation of auditory nerve fibers.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Guyot,et al.  Measurements of electrode position inside the cochlea for different cochlear implant systems , 2005, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  Peter Nopp,et al.  Deep electrode insertion in cochlear implants: apical morphology, electrodes and speech perception results. , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[3]  M. Dorman,et al.  Simulating the effect of cochlear-implant electrode insertion depth on speech understanding. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[5]  G M Clark,et al.  Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[6]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Frequency-place compression and expansion in cochlear implant listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A. Faulkner,et al.  Adaptation by normal listeners to upward spectral shifts of speech: implications for cochlear implants. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Deniz Baskent,et al.  Speech recognition under conditions of frequency-place compression and expansion. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  G. Clark,et al.  Cochlear implant place psychophysics. 2. Comparison of forward masking and pitch estimation data. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[10]  R. Hilsinger,et al.  Computer-Generated Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Cochlea , 1989, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  L M Collins,et al.  Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. , 1997, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Uwe Baumann,et al.  The cochlear implant electrode–pitch function , 2006, Hearing Research.

[13]  P J Blamey,et al.  Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[15]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear view: postoperative radiography for cochlear implantation. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[16]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[17]  R. Shannon,et al.  Effects of electrode configuration and frequency allocation on vowel recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[18]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  M F Dorman,et al.  Pitch scaling and speech understanding by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[20]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  The effects of short-term training for spectrally mismatched noise-band speech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Human Cochlear Maps: Measurement of the Lengths of Organ of Corti, Outer Wall, Inner Wall, and Rosenthal's Canal , 1996, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[22]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C S Throckmorton,et al.  Investigating perceptual features of electrode stimulation via a multidimensional scaling paradigm. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R V Shannon,et al.  Effects of electrode location and spacing on phoneme recognition with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[25]  W. Baumgartner,et al.  Cochlear Implant Deep‐Insertion Surgery , 1997, The Laryngoscope.

[26]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Perceptual learning following changes in the frequency-to-electrode assignment with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  G M Clark,et al.  Cochlear implant place psychophysics 1. Pitch estimation with deeply inserted electrodes. , 1996, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[28]  R. Shannon,et al.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[30]  M. Dorman,et al.  Adaptation by a Cochlear-Implant Patient to Upward Shifts in the Frequency Representation of Speech , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[31]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing , 2006, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[32]  F. Zeng,et al.  Speech recognition with altered spectral distribution of envelope cues. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Marco Pelizzone,et al.  Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[36]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[37]  J. Fayad,et al.  The Clarion electrode positioner: temporal bone studies. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[38]  F B Simmons,et al.  A functioning multichannel auditory nerve stimulator. A preliminary report on two human volunteers. , 1979, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[39]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.