Rooting molecular trees: problems and strategies

In constructing phylogenies from molecular data both the composition of the ingroup and the choice of outgroup can strongly affect the chances of obtaining the correct topology. This is because tree topology and uneven rates of molecular evolution affect the ability of tree-building algorithms to find the correct tree. Outgroups can be added in one of two ways, either to a single sister clade (preferably the closest) or through addition of single taxa from different clades. On theoretical and empirical grounds the former strategy is shown to be much more beneficial, both in terms of redressing balance and reducing stemminess. For parsimony to perform well some selection of sequence data, through omission or weighting, is also often necessary to reduce levels of homoplasy.

[1]  R. Cano,et al.  Amplification and sequencing of DNA from a 120–135-million-year-old weevil , 1993, Nature.

[2]  Q. Wheeler,et al.  The Out-Group Comparison Method of Character Analysis , 1981 .

[3]  G. Nelson.  OUTGROUPS AND ONTOGENY , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[4]  Wayne P. Maddison,et al.  Outgroup Analysis and Parsimony , 1984 .

[5]  G. Nelson.  Ontogeny, Phylogeny, Paleontology, and the Biogenetic Law , 1978 .

[6]  M. Donoghue,et al.  The Importance of Fossils in Phylogeny Reconstruction , 1989 .

[7]  M. Clegg,et al.  Chloroplast DNA sequence from a Miocene Magnolia species , 1990, Nature.

[8]  Nick Goldman,et al.  MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD INFERENCE OF PHYLOGENETIC TREES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO A POISSON PROCESS MODEL OF DNA SUBSTITUTION AND TO PARSIMONY ANALYSES , 1990 .

[9]  Junhyong Kim,et al.  ACCURACY OF PHYLOGENETIC‐ESTIMATION METHODS UNDER UNEQUAL EVOLUTIONARY RATES , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability. , 1988, Annual review of genetics.

[11]  R. DeSalle,et al.  DNA sequences from a fossil termite in Oligo-Miocene amber and their phylogenetic implications. , 1992, Science.

[12]  S. Lanyon.  The Stochastic Mode of Molecular Evolution: What Consequences for Systematic Investigations? , 1988 .

[13]  R. DeSalle,et al.  Phylogeny of the Bovidae (Artiodactyla, Mammalia), based on mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[14]  Ward C. Wheeler,et al.  NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE PHYLOGENY AND RANDOM OUTGROUPS , 1990, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[15]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  Parsimony and likelihood: an exchange , 1986 .

[16]  S. Pääbo,et al.  DNA phylogeny of the extinct marsupial wolf , 1989, Nature.

[17]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  ACCURACY OF ESTIMATED PHYLOGENIES: EFFECTS OF TREE TOPOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY MODEL , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  K. Queiroz**,et al.  The Ontogenetic Method for Determining Character Polarity and its Relevance to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1985 .

[19]  A B Smith,et al.  Comparative variation of morphological and molecular evolution through geologic time: 28S ribosomal RNA versus morphology in echinoids. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  E. Golenberg.  Amplification and analysis of Miocene plant fossil DNA. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[21]  Michael D. Hendy,et al.  A Framework for the Quantitative Study of Evolutionary Trees , 1989 .

[22]  E. Bermingham,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA evolution at a turtle's pace: evidence for low genetic variability and reduced microevolutionary rate in the Testudines. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  C. Krimbas,et al.  Accuracy of phylogenetic trees estimated from DNA sequence data. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[24]  A. Kluge.  ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[25]  M. Lynch.  PHYLOGENETIC HYPOTHESES UNDER THE ASSUMPTION OF NEUTRAL QUANTITATIVE‐GENETIC VARIATION , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  D. Hillis,et al.  Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[27]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  AMNIOTE PHYLOGENY AND THE IMPORTANCE OF FOSSILS , 1988, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[28]  F. Rohlf,et al.  EVALUATION OF THE RESTRICTED MAXIMUM‐LIKELIHOOD METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PHYLOGENETIC TREES USING SIMULATED ALLELE‐FREQUENCY DATA , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  M. Nei,et al.  Relative efficiencies of the maximum parsimony and distance-matrix methods in obtaining the correct phylogenetic tree. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[30]  S. Pääbo,et al.  Bacterial DNA in Clarkia fossils. , 1991, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  J. Felsenstein.  Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading , 1978 .

[32]  R. Debry,et al.  The consistency of several phylogeny-inference methods under varying evolutionary rates. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Rates of mitochondrial DNA evolution in sharks are slow compared with mammals , 1992, Nature.

[34]  E. Wiley,et al.  THEORIES AND METHODS IN DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS , 1985, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[35]  M. Miyamoto,et al.  Testing phylogenetic approaches with empirical data, as illustrated with the parsimony method. , 1992, Molecular biology and evolution.

[36]  S. Hedges,et al.  Tetrapod phylogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. , 1990, Molecular biology and evolution.

[37]  James S. Farris,et al.  Outgroups and Parsimony , 1982 .

[38]  J. Barta,et al.  Evolutionary relationships of avian Eimeria species among other Apicomplexan protozoa: monophyly of the apicomplexa is supported. , 1991, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  N. Saitou,et al.  Relative Efficiencies of the Fitch-Margoliash, Maximum-Parsimony, Maximum-Likelihood, Minimum-Evolution, and Neighbor-joining Methods of Phylogenetic Tree Construction in Obtaining the Correct Tree , 1989 .