Framingham Heart Study: the first 20 years.

The Framingham Heart Study remains the most famous and influential investigation in cardiovascular disease epidemiology. To generations of epidemiologists, it is a model for the cohort design. Here we revisit the origins of the Framingham Study before it became an accomplished and famous investigation whose existence and success are taken for granted. When in 1947 the Public Health Service initiated the study, knowledge of the distribution and determinants of coronary heart disease was sparse. Epidemiology was primarily focused on infectious disorders. Framingham's pioneers struggled to invent an appropriate epidemiological approach to this chronic disease and to establish support for a new kind of research within a community. Thereafter they had to convince skeptical medical professionals that the results of epidemiological investigations of heart disease were applicable to their clinical practices.

[1]  W. Kannel,et al.  Susceptibility to coronary heart disease. , 1961, Modern concepts of cardiovascular disease.

[2]  H. Marks,et al.  Reviews: Medicine and Health-The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900-1990 , 1997 .

[3]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[4]  Christopher Hamlin,et al.  The Progress of Experiment: Science and Therapeutic Reform in the United States, 1900-1990 , 1998 .

[5]  G. Rose.  Familial Patterns in Ischaemic Heart Disease , 1964, British journal of preventive & social medicine.

[6]  G. Oppenheimer.  Becoming the Framingham Study 1947-1950. , 2005, American journal of public health.

[7]  William G. Rothstein,et al.  Public Health and the Risk Factor: A History of an Uneven Medical Revolution , 1987 .

[8]  W. Kannel,et al.  Detection of the coronary-prone adult: the Framingham study. , 1966, Journal of the Iowa Medical Society.

[9]  W. H. Frost.  Risk of Persons in Familial Contact with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. , 1933, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[10]  É. Giroux.  [Cohort study and multivariate analysis: an epistemological and historical analysis of the Framingham heart study]. , 2008, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[11]  J. Herbst.  No Ivory Tower: McCarthyism and the Universities , 1990 .

[12]  T. Cooper.  Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. , 1976, Military medicine.

[13]  J. Stamler,et al.  Epidemiology of coronary heart disease. , 1973, The Medical clinics of North America.

[14]  J. Doyle,et al.  A prospective study of degenerative cardiovascular disease in Albany: report of three years' experience. I. Ischemic heart disease. , 1957, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[15]  M. Nichaman,et al.  Coronary heart disease among men of Japanese ancestry in Hawaii. The Honolulu Heart study. , 1971, Israel journal of medical sciences.

[16]  Kannel Wb,et al.  Detection of the coronary-prone adult: the Framingham study. , 1966 .

[17]  J. W. Gardner,et al.  Health, Education, and Welfare. , 1965, Science.

[18]  T. Dawber,et al.  II. Coronary Heart Disease in the Framingham Study , 1957 .

[19]  T. Dawber,et al.  The Framingham Study: The Epidemiology of Atherosclerotic Disease , 1980 .

[20]  M Susser,et al.  Epidemiology in the United States after World War II: the evolution of technique. , 1985, Epidemiologic reviews.

[21]  E. Simonson,et al.  Coronary Heart Disease among Minnesota Business and Professional Men Followed Fifteen Years , 1963, Circulation.

[22]  E. W. Etheridge.  Sentinel for Health: A History of the Centers for Disease Control , 1994 .

[23]  M. García-palmieri,et al.  An epidemiological study on coronary heart disease in Puerto Rico: The Puerto Rico Heart Health Program. , 1969, Boletin de la Asociacion Medica de Puerto Rico.

[24]  J. M. Chapman,et al.  Measuring the risk of coronary heart disease in adult population groups. The clinical status of a population group in Los Angeles under observation for two to three years. , 1957, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[25]  A. Keys.  Nutrition in relation to the etiology and the course of degenerative diseases. , 1948, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[26]  W. Kannel,et al.  Cigarette Smoking and Coronary Heart Disease , 1962 .

[27]  G. Oppenheimer.  Profiling risk: the emergence of coronary heart disease epidemiology in the United States (1947-70). , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[28]  T. Dawber,et al.  Coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. , 1957, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[29]  J. Doyle,et al.  III. A Prospective Study of Degenerative Cardiovascular Disease in Albany: Report of Three Years' Experience—1. Ischemic Heart Disease , 1957 .

[30]  R. Aronowitz.  Making Sense of Illness: Science, Society and Disease , 1998 .

[31]  Kannel Wb,et al.  HAZARDS OF CORONARY DISEASE. CONCLUSIONS FOR MEDICAL PRACTICE FROM 10 YEARS OF FRAMINGHAM STUDY , 1965 .

[32]  Education Welfare.,et al.  Smoking and Health. Report of the Advisory Committee to the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service. , 1964 .

[33]  W. Kannel,et al.  Factors of risk in the development of coronary heart disease--six year follow-up experience. The Framingham Study. , 1961, Annals of internal medicine.

[34]  W. Kannel,et al.  Epidemiology of coronary heart disease. Implications for the practicing physician. , 1962, Geriatrics.

[35]  N. Christakis,et al.  The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network Over 32 Years , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.