Multi-subject fMRI analysis via combined independent component analysis and shift-invariant canonical polyadic decomposition

BACKGROUND Canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) may face a local optimal problem when analyzing multi-subject fMRI data with inter-subject variability. Beckmann and Smith proposed a tensor PICA approach that incorporated an independence constraint to the spatial modality by combining CPD with ICA, and alleviated the problem of inter-subject spatial map (SM) variability. NEW METHOD This study extends tensor PICA to incorporate additional inter-subject time course (TC) variability and to connect CPD and ICA in a new way. Assuming multiple subjects share common TCs but with different time delays, we accommodate subject-dependent TC delays into the CP model based on the idea of shift-invariant CP (SCP). We use ICA as an initialization step to provide the aggregating mixing matrix for shift-invariant CPD to estimate shared TCs with subject-dependent delays and intensities. We then estimate shared SMs using a least-squares fit post shift-invariant CPD. RESULTS Using simulated fMRI data as well as actual fMRI data we demonstrate that the proposed approach improves the estimates of the shared SMs and TCs, and the subject-dependent TC delays and intensities. The default mode component illustrates larger TC delays than the task-related component. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S) The proposed approach shows improvements over tensor PICA in particular when TC delays are large, and also outperforms SCP with SM orthogonality constraint and SCP with ICA-based SM initialization. CONCLUSIONS TCs with subject-dependent delays conform to the true situation of multi-subject fMRI data. The proposed approach is suitable for decomposing multi-subject fMRI data with large inter-subject temporal and spatial variability.

[1]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Shift-invariant multilinear decomposition of neuroimaging data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[2]  William S Rayens,et al.  Structure-seeking multilinear methods for the analysis of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[3]  Ying Guo,et al.  A unified framework for group independent component analysis for multi-subject fMRI data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[4]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..

[5]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Reduced executive and default network functional connectivity in cigarette smokers , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Ciprian M. Crainiceanu,et al.  Two-stage decompositions for the analysis of functional connectivity for fMRI with application to Alzheimer's disease risk , 2010, NeuroImage.

[7]  Susan Spear Bassett,et al.  Analysis of Group ICA-Based Connectivity Measures from fMRI: Application to Alzheimer's Disease , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Aberrant localization of synchronous hemodynamic activity in auditory cortex reliably characterizes schizophrenia , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  What is the best similarity measure for motion correction in fMRI time series? , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  ICA of full complex-valued fMRI data using phase information of spatial maps , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Canonical Polyadic Decomposition Based on a Single Mode Blind Source Separation , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Stephen C. Strother,et al.  Evaluation of spatio-temporal decomposition techniques for group analysis of fMRI resting state data sets , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Multisubject Independent Component Analysis of fMRI: A Decade of Intrinsic Networks, Default Mode, and Neurodiagnostic Discovery , 2012, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  SimTB, a simulation toolbox for fMRI data under a model of spatiotemporal separability , 2012, NeuroImage.

[17]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Preserving subject variability in group fMRI analysis: performance evaluation of GICA vs. IVA , 2014, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[18]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Tensor Decompositions for Signal Processing Applications: From two-way to multiway component analysis , 2014, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[19]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Modeling latency and shape changes in trial based neuroimaging data , 2011, 2011 Conference Record of the Forty Fifth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[20]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  fMRI resting state networks define distinct modes of long-distance interactions in the human brain , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  R. Bro PARAFAC. Tutorial and applications , 1997 .

[22]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Shifted factor analysis—Part III: N‐way generalization and application , 2003 .

[23]  E. Oja,et al.  BSS and ICA in Neuroinformatics: From Current Practices to Open Challenges , 2008, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  C. F. Beckmann,et al.  Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject FMRI analysis , 2005, NeuroImage.

[25]  E. Oja,et al.  Independent Component Analysis , 2013 .

[26]  David Ruppert,et al.  An evaluation of independent component analyses with an application to resting‐state fMRI , 2014, Biometrics.

[27]  S Makeig,et al.  Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Te-Won Lee,et al.  Independent vector analysis (IVA): Multivariate approach for fMRI group study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[29]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Capturing inter-subject variability with group independent component analysis of fMRI data: A simulation study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[30]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Semiblind spatial ICA of fMRI using spatial constraints , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen,et al.  Shifted Non-Negative Matrix Factorization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing.

[32]  V. Calhoun,et al.  Functional Brain Networks in Schizophrenia: A Review , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  A Baseline for the Multivariate Comparison of Resting-State Networks , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[34]  V. D. Calhoun,et al.  Distinct intrinsic network connectivity patterns of post‐traumatic stress disorder symptom clusters , 2015, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[35]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  Shifted Independent Component Analysis , 2007, ICA.

[36]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Tülay Adali,et al.  Comparison of multi‐subject ICA methods for analysis of fMRI data , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Sungjin Hong,et al.  A critique of Tensor Probabilistic Independent Component Analysis: Implications and recommendations for multi-subject fMRI data analysis , 2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[39]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[40]  S. Debener,et al.  Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: A systematic review , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[41]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  Behavioral Interpretations of Intrinsic Connectivity Networks , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  2011 Ieee International Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing Iva for Multi-subject Fmri Analysis: a Comparative Study Using a New Simulation Toolbox , 2022 .

[43]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  A Combination of Parallel Factor and Independent Component Analysis , 2022 .

[44]  Yuhui Du,et al.  Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis , 2013, NeuroImage.

[45]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Multi-subject fMRI data analysis: Shift-invariant tensor factorization vs. group independent component analysis , 2013, 2013 IEEE China Summit and International Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[46]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Nonnegative Matrix and Tensor Factorization T , 2007 .

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[48]  J. Pekar,et al.  A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[49]  L. Freire,et al.  Motion Correction Algorithms May Create Spurious Brain Activations in the Absence of Subject Motion , 2001, NeuroImage.