Real-Time Contact Force Measurement: A Key Parameter for Controlling Lesion Creation With Radiofrequency Energy

Radiofrequency (RF) energy, the dominant energy source for the treatment of various arrhythmias by catheter ablation, has replaced most other treatments for the effective suppression of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias.1 With expanding indications, it has become increasingly clear that the success and sustainable effect of RF ablation depends on a critical understanding of the biophysics of lesion creation and its control. RF current at the electrode tissue (ET) interface is the key to RF lesion creation by virtue of its tissue heating capability2 but cannot be measured directly, and therefore, delivered RF power and duration are typically manipulated to control lesion creation.3 Despite such manipulation, there is significant variability in lesion size, which is thought to be responsible for both inefficacy and complications. Contact between electrode and tissue may be the key parameter to control lesion size because it is essential for the passage of current into the target tissue, but has until recently remained intangible and unmeasurable. RF energy delivery creates tissue coagulation and necrosis by producing targeted tissue hyperthermia. This hyperthermia is the consequence of resistive heating of a thin rim of tissue in direct contact with the RF energy delivering electrode, with surrounding tissue being heated by conduction. Direct resistive heating is produced by a high density of alternating current, the magnitude of which declines with the inverse of the square of the distance; therefore, target tissue contact is essential for effective lesion formation.3 The key to effective and safe treatment with RF catheter ablation is controlling lesion size, that is, increasing or decreasing lesion size as desired. Precise control of lesion size is particularly important for treatment strategies requiring multiple coalescent ablations, for example, linear lesions making strategies, such as for atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation (AF), and reentrant ventricular tachycardia.4 The …

[1]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Toward Online Modeling for Lesion Visualization and Monitoring in Cardiac Ablation Therapy , 2013, MICCAI.

[2]  J. Olgin,et al.  Biophysical characteristics of radiofrequency lesion formation in vivo: dynamics of catheter tip-tissue contact evaluated by intracardiac echocardiography. , 1997, American heart journal.

[3]  Haran Burri,et al.  AB36-6: Evaluation of a new catheter sensor for real-time measurement of tissue contact , 2006 .

[4]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  Use of electrical coupling information in AF catheter ablation: a prospective randomized pilot study. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[5]  Andrea Natale,et al.  Relationship Between Catheter Forces, Lesion Characteristics, “Popping,” and Char Formation: Experience with Robotic Navigation System , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  J. Burkhardt,et al.  General anesthesia reduces the prevalence of pulmonary vein reconnection during repeat ablation when compared with conscious sedation: results from a randomized study. , 2011, Heart rhythm.

[7]  J. Kalman,et al.  Prospective Characterization of Catheter–Tissue Contact Force at Different Anatomic Sites During Antral Pulmonary Vein Isolation , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[8]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  Steerable Versus Nonsteerable Sheath Technology in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2011, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[9]  Y. Okumura,et al.  A Systematical Analysis of In Vivo Contact Forces on Virtual Catheter Tip/Tissue Surface Contact during Cardiac Mapping and Intervention , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[10]  Christopher Piorkowski,et al.  First in Human Validation of Impedance‐Based Catheter Tip‐to‐Tissue Contact Assessment in the Left Atrium , 2009, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[11]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Co , 2003, Circulation.

[12]  Aravindan Kolandaivelu,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Tissue Heating During Cardiac Radiofrequency Ablation Using MRI Thermography , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[13]  C. Brombin,et al.  Contact Force Monitoring for Cardiac Mapping in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[14]  H. Lambert,et al.  Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and Thrombus , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[15]  Geoffrey Lee,et al.  Effect of respiration on catheter-tissue contact force during ablation of atrial arrhythmias. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[16]  J. Hare,et al.  The Effects of Electrode‐Tissue Contact on Radiofrequency Lesion Generation , 1997, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  Daniel Steven,et al.  Catheter motion during atrial ablation due to the beating heart and respiration: impact on accuracy and spatial referencing in three-dimensional mapping. , 2007, Heart rhythm.

[18]  Andrea Natale,et al.  Locations of High Contact Force During Left Atrial Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Electrogram Amplitude and Impedance Are Poor Predictors of Electrode-Tissue Contact Force for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[19]  F. Sacher,et al.  Characterization of Contact Force During Endocardial and Epicardial Ventricular Mapping , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[20]  Hendrik Lambert,et al.  Catheter tip force required for mechanical perforation of porcine cardiac chambers. , 2011, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[21]  Helmut Pürerfellner,et al.  Clinical Impact of an Open‐Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter with Direct Force Measurement on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  J. Bates,et al.  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol , 2011 .

[23]  G. Edwards,et al.  Characterization of Catheter–Tissue Contact Force During Epicardial Radiofrequency Ablation in an Ovine Model , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[24]  É. Marijon,et al.  Real‐Time Contact Force Sensing for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in the Setting of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Procedural and 1‐Year Results , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[25]  D. Haines,et al.  Basic Aspects of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 1994, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[26]  R. Hunter,et al.  Impact of Steerable Sheaths on Contact Forces and Reconnection Sites in Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[27]  Alistair McEwan,et al.  Electrogram-Gated Radiofrequency Ablations With Duty Cycle Power Delivery Negate Effects of Ablation Catheter Motion , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[28]  Aravinda Thiagalingam,et al.  Importance of Catheter Contact Force During Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation: Evaluation in a Porcine Ex Vivo Model Using a Force‐Sensing Catheter , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[29]  Optimal contact forces to minimize cardiac perforations before, during, and/or after radiofrequency or cryothermal ablations. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[30]  D. Shah,et al.  Tracking dynamic conduction recovery across the cavotricuspid isthmus. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  H. Lambert,et al.  Relationship Between Catheter Contact Force and Radiofrequency Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop in the Beating Canine Heart: Electrogram Amplitude, Impedance, and Electrode Temperature Are Poor Predictors of Electrode-Tissue Contact Force and Lesion Size , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[32]  Silvia G Priori,et al.  ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Co , 2003, Circulation.

[33]  Douglas L. Packer,et al.  Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  B. Olshansky,et al.  Using omega-3 fatty acids to treat persistent atrial fibrillation: time to fish or cut bait? , 2012, Heart Rhythm.

[35]  M. Haissaguerre,et al.  Endocardial Versus Epicardial Ventricular Radiofrequency Ablation: Utility of In Vivo Contact Force Assessment , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[36]  R N Hauer,et al.  Control of radiofrequency lesion size by power regulation. , 1989, Circulation.

[37]  Sanjay Dixit,et al.  Efforts to enhance catheter stability improve atrial fibrillation ablation outcome. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[38]  Hendrik Lambert,et al.  Area Under the Real‐Time Contact Force Curve (Force–Time Integral) Predicts Radiofrequency Lesion Size in an In Vitro Contractile Model , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[39]  Nadir Saoudi,et al.  A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[40]  W. Saliba,et al.  Novel Robotic Catheter Remote Control System: Feasibility and Safety of Transseptal Puncture and Endocardial Catheter Navigation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[41]  Jan Petru,et al.  Electrical Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Is Contingent on Contact Force During Initial Treatment: Results From the EFFICAS I Study , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[42]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of the Relationship Between Contact Force and Left Atrial Scar Formation After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[43]  J. Kalman,et al.  Catheter‐Tissue Contact Force Determines Atrial Electrogram Characteristics Before and Lesion Efficacy After Antral Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Humans , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[44]  K. Kuck,et al.  In vivo left-ventricular contact force analysis: comparison of antegrade transseptal with retrograde transaortic mapping strategies and correlation of impedance and electrical amplitude with contact force , 2014, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[45]  N. Van Mieghem,et al.  The first human experience of a contact force sensing catheter for epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia , 2014, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[46]  David E. Haines,et al.  Determinants of Lesion Size During Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: The Role of Electrode‐Tissue Contact Pressure and Duration of Energy Delivery , 1991 .

[47]  Nadir Saoudi,et al.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.