A Beacon Interval Shifting Scheme for Interference Mitigation in Body Area Networks

This paper investigates the issue of interference avoidance in body area networks (BANs). IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 presented several schemes to reduce such interference, but these schemes are still not proper solutions for BANs. We present a novel distributed TDMA-based beacon interval shifting scheme that reduces interference in the BANs. A design goal of the scheme is to avoid the wakeup period of each BAN coinciding with other networks by employing carrier sensing before a beacon transmission. We analyze the beacon interval shifting scheme and investigate the proper back-off length when the channel is busy. We compare the performance of the proposed scheme with the schemes presented in IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6 using an OMNeT++ simulation. The simulation results show that the proposed scheme has a lower packet loss, energy consumption, and delivery-latency than the schemes of IEEE 802.15 Task Group 6.

[1]  David E. Culler,et al.  Telos: enabling ultra-low power wireless research , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[2]  Jianfeng Wang,et al.  Applications, challenges, and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies , 2010, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[3]  Victor C. M. Leung,et al.  Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: A survey and outlook , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  A. Varga,et al.  THE OMNET++ DISCRETE EVENT SIMULATION SYSTEM , 2003 .

[5]  Vijay Sivaraman,et al.  Transmission Power Control in Body Area Sensor Networks for Healthcare Monitoring , 2009, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  Bin Shen,et al.  A Study of MAC Protocols for WBANs , 2009, Sensors.

[7]  Muhannad Quwaider,et al.  Body-posture-based dynamic link power control in wearable sensor networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Simon L. Cotton,et al.  A simulated study of co-channel inter-BAN interference at 2.45 GHz and 60 GHz , 2010, The 3rd European Wireless Technology Conference.

[9]  Leif Hanlen,et al.  Interference in body area networks: Distance does not dominate , 2009, 2009 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[10]  Ramesh R. Rao,et al.  Coexistence mechanisms for interference mitigation in the 2.4-GHz ISM band , 2003, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[11]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .