Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans Adherence by Means of Surface Hydrophilization

Derivatives of polyalkylene oxide (PAO) were examined for their ability to inhibit adherence of 3H-labeled cells of Streptococcus mutans to hydroxyapatite (HA) and to plastic surfaces treated with buffer or parotid saliva from two individuals. Pellicles formed on HA with saliva from the two subjects were distinct in their binding capacity. One saliva promoted and the other saliva reduced adherence, as compared with the buffer control (BHA). Three of the PAO compounds effectively hindered binding of bacteria to BHA. However, on saliva-treated HA (SHA) the inhibition was not as effective. One compound, a phosphated polypropylene glycol, was potent in inhibiting adherence both to BHA and to the plastic surfaces treated with either buffer or saliva. However, treatment of HA with this compound followed by saliva incubation only gave a limited reduction in the number of bacteria binding. Evidently, salivary constituents are capable of interacting also with the PAOtreated surface. When 14C-labeled hydrophilizing agent was used, it was shown that the PAO was not replaced by salivary molecules. Instead, the components of the saliva that mediate the binding of bacteria seemed capable of adhering directly to the PAO layer.

[1]  H. Fleisch,et al.  The binding of pyrophosphate and two diphosphonates by hydroxyapatite crystals , 1973, Calcified Tissue Research.

[2]  R. Gibbons Bacterial Adhesion to Oral Tissues: A Model for Infectious Diseases , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[3]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The Influence of Surface Free-energy on Planimetric Plaque Growth in Man , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[4]  H. Busscher,et al.  The Effects of Pellicle Formation on Streptococcal Adhesion to Human Enamel and Artificial Substrata with Various Surface Free-energies , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[5]  M. Loosdrecht,et al.  Adhesion of bacteria to polystyrene surfaces , 1989 .

[6]  W. Norde,et al.  Protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion to solid surfaces: a colloid-chemical approach. , 1989 .

[7]  M. Quirynen,et al.  The Role of Surface Free Energy in the Early In vivo Formation of Dental Plaque on Human Enamel and Polymeric Substrata , 1989 .

[8]  D. I. Hay,et al.  ADSORBED SALIVARY PROLINE-RICH PROTEINS AS BACTERIAL RECEPTORS ON APATITIC SURFACES , 1989 .

[9]  H. Busscher,et al.  Effect of Zeta Potential and Surface Energy on Bacterial Adhesion to Uncoated and Saliva-coated Human Enamel and Dentin , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[10]  M. Humphries,et al.  The use of non-ionic ethoxylated and propoxylated surfactants to prevent the adhesion of bacteria to solid surfaces , 1987 .

[11]  M. Humphries,et al.  The effect of a range of biological polymers and synthetic surfactants on the adhesion of a marine Pseudomonas sp. strain NCMB 2021 to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces , 1986 .

[12]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Nonbactericidal approach to reduce colonization of plaque microflora on teeth in vitro and in vivo. , 1985, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[13]  J. Paul,et al.  Evidence for Separate Adhesion Mechanisms for Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Surfaces in Vibrio proteolytica , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  Harry F. Ridgway,et al.  Bacterial Adhesion and Fouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes , 1985 .

[15]  J. Olsson,et al.  Hydrophobicity and adherence of oral streptococci after repeated subculture in vitro , 1983, Infection and immunity.

[16]  J. Leja Surface Chemistry of Froth Flotation , 1982 .

[17]  S. Holt,et al.  In vitro studies of dental plaque formation: adsorption of oral streptococci to hydroxyaptite , 1979, Infection and immunity.

[18]  C. Yong,et al.  A Simple Ultrasound Method to Characterize in vitro Plaque Inhibition Activity , 1979, Journal of dentistry research.

[19]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Comparative Estimates of Bacterial Affinities and Adsorption Sites on Hydroxyapatite Surfaces , 1978, Infection and immunity.

[20]  W. Bowen,et al.  Interaction of hydroxyapatite and protein-coated hydroxyapatite with Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguis. , 2009, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology.

[21]  J. Olsson,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility of oral streptococci. , 1976, Archives of oral biology.

[22]  B. Melsen,et al.  Desorption of protein and bacteria from hydroxyapatite by fluoride and monofluorophosphate. , 1975, Caries research.

[23]  D. I. Hay The interaction of human parotid salivary proteins with hydroxyapatite. , 1973, Archives of oral biology.

[24]  G. Bernardi,et al.  Chromatography of polypeptides and proteins on hydroxyapatite columns. , 1968, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  T. Ericson Salivary glycoproteins. Composition and adsorption to hydroxylapatite in relation to the formation of dental pellicles and calculus. , 1968, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.