Cost Efficiency in Periodic Tariff Reviews : The Reference Utility Approach and the Role of Interest Groups ♣

This paper uses efficiency estimates obtained from both a parametric and a non-parametric benchmarking model to examine the application of the Model Company approach in periodic tariff reviews and check for potential determinants of firms’ bargaining power in the rate setting process. The investigation indicates a role for political pressures in driving regulatory decisions, points to a possible inaccuracy of the cost parameters employed in the engineering Model Company method and reveals that the regulator’s objectives might not have been welfare maximizing in some situations. The results reveal the influence of more affluent consumers during the rate setting and show that firms which operate in more densely populated areas received substantially lower prices than the economic benchmarking methods would recommend. On the other hand, the findings indicate that significantly higher prices might have been given to companies with the opposite characteristics, to concessionaries which make part of a specific economic group and to firms initially submitted to the review process.

[1]  G. Stigler The Theory of Economic Regulation , 2021, The Political Economy.

[2]  S. Peltzman Toward a More General Theory of Regulation , 1976, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[3]  D. Kamerschen,et al.  Pricing in the nuclear power industry: Public or private interest? , 1992 .

[4]  Leslie E. Papke,et al.  Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates , 1993 .

[5]  John W. Mayo,et al.  The political economy of deregulation: The case of intrastate long distance , 1993 .

[6]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[7]  B. Laplante,et al.  Monitoring of Pollution Regulation : Do Local Conditions Matter ? * , 1997 .

[8]  C. C. Klein,et al.  Regulator preferences and utility prices: evidence from natural gas distribution utilities , 1999 .

[9]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  Incorporating the Operating Environment Into a Nonparametric Measure of Technical Efficiency , 1999 .

[10]  M. Pollitt,et al.  Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience , 2000 .

[11]  Dennis L. Weisman The (in)Efficiency of the “Efficient-Firm” Cost Standard , 2000 .

[12]  Alexander Galetovic,et al.  Regulación por empresa eficiente: ¿quién es realmente usted? , 2001 .

[13]  La regulación de las empresas sanitarias en Chile: una revisión del caso de EMOS y una propuesta de reforma regulatoria , 2001 .

[14]  P. Lanoie,et al.  Environmental Policy, Public Interest and Political Market , 2004 .

[15]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Gaming the Regulator: A Survey , 2003 .

[16]  C. A. Knox Lovell,et al.  The managers versus the consultants , 2003 .

[17]  S. Paulo,et al.  REGULAÇÃO TARIFÁRIA DO SETOR DE DISTRIBUIÇÃO DE ENERGIA ELÉTRICA NO BRASIL: UMA ANÁLISE DA METODOLOGIA DE REVISÃO TARIFÁRIA ADOTADA PELA ANEEL , 2005 .

[18]  Christopher R. Knittel,et al.  The Adoption of State Electricity Regulation: The Role of Interest Groups , 2006 .

[19]  Tooraj Jamasb,et al.  Reference models and incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks : An evaluation of Sweden's Network Performance Assessment Model (NPAM) , 2008 .

[20]  T. Jamasb,et al.  Yardstick and Ex-Post Utility Regulation by Norm Model : Empirical Equivalence , Pricing Effect , and Performance in Sweden , 2009 .