Dazzled by shine: gloss as an antipredator strategy in fast moving prey

Previous studies on stationary prey have found mixed results for the role of a glossy appearance in predator avoidance—some have found that glossiness can act as warning coloration or improve camouflage, whereas others detected no survival benefit. An alternative untested hypothesis is that glossiness could provide protection in the form of dynamic dazzle. Fast moving animals that are glossy produce flashes of light that increase in frequency at higher speeds, which could make it harder for predators to track and accurately locate prey. We tested this hypothesis by presenting praying mantids with glossy or matte targets moving at slow and fast speed. Mantids were less likely to strike glossy targets, independently of speed. Additionally, mantids were less likely to track glossy targets and more likely to hit the target with one out of the two legs that struck rather than both raptorial legs, but only when targets were moving fast. These results support the hypothesis that a glossy appearance may have a function as an antipredator strategy by reducing the ability of predators to track and accurately target fast moving prey.

[1]  M. Kolnegari,et al.  Opportunistic depredation of songbird nestlings by female praying mantids (Mantodea: Mantidae) , 2022, Ecology and evolution.

[2]  Amanda M. Franklin All camouflage strategies are not equal , 2022, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[3]  Samuel B. Powell,et al.  Polarization vision mitigates visual noise from flickering light underwater , 2022, Science advances.

[4]  Joanna R. Hall,et al.  Beetle iridescence induces an avoidance response in naïve avian predators , 2022, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Erlend B. Nilsen,et al.  Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence. , 2021, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[6]  Anne E. Aulsebrook,et al.  Cracks in the mirror hypothesis: high specularity does not reduce detection or predation risk , 2021, Functional Ecology.

[7]  D. Stuart-Fox,et al.  Heating rates are more strongly influenced by near-infrared than visible reflectance in beetles. , 2021, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  M. Elgar,et al.  Motion: enhancing signals and concealing cues , 2021, Biology open.

[9]  Amanda M. Franklin,et al.  Gloss , 2021, Current Biology.

[10]  Alastair J. Ludington,et al.  From matte banded to glossy black: structures underlying colour change in the caudal lures of southern death adders (Acanthophis antarcticus, Reptilia: Elapidae) , 2021, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.

[11]  Devi Stuart-Fox,et al.  The Paradox of Iridescent Signals. , 2020, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  J. Niven,et al.  Prey speed influences the speed and structure of the raptorial strike of a ‘sit-and-wait’ predator , 2020, Biology Letters.

[13]  Chad M. Eliason,et al.  Cassowary gloss and a novel form of structural color in birds , 2020, Science Advances.

[14]  Gopal Murali,et al.  Size and unpredictable movement together affect the effectiveness of dynamic flash coloration , 2020, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Henry D. Knowles,et al.  Iridescence as Camouflage , 2020, Current Biology.

[16]  James O'Keeffe,et al.  Second-order cues to figure motion enable object detection during prey capture by praying mantises , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Innes C Cuthill,et al.  Camouflage in a dynamic world , 2019, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[18]  Kohske Takahashi,et al.  Welcome to the Tidyverse , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[19]  Gopal Murali,et al.  What makes motion dazzle markings effective against predation? , 2019, Behavioral Ecology.

[20]  Jenny C. A. Read,et al.  Pattern and Speed Interact to Hide Moving Prey , 2019, Current Biology.

[21]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Dappled light disrupts prey detection by masking movement , 2019, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  W. Adams,et al.  Disruptive coloration and binocular disparity: breaking camouflage , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[23]  Gavin J. Svenson,et al.  Predatory behavior changes with satiety or increased insulin levels in the praying mantis (Tenodera sinensis) , 2019, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[24]  Hugo Gruson,et al.  Quantitative characterization of iridescent colours in biological studies: a novel method using optical theory , 2018, Journal of the Royal Society Interface Focus.

[25]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Concealment in a dynamic world: dappled light and caustics mask movement , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[26]  Gopal Murali,et al.  Now you see me, now you don't: dynamic flash coloration as an antipredator strategy in motion , 2018, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Jenny C. A. Read,et al.  A Novel Form of Stereo Vision in the Praying Mantis , 2018, Current Biology.

[28]  Vivek Nityananda,et al.  Stereopsis in animals: evolution, function and mechanisms , 2017, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  R. Whyte,et al.  A Field Guide to Spiders of Australia , 2017 .

[30]  J. Endler,et al.  Experimental evidence suggests that specular reflectance and glossy appearance help amplify warning signals , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Doekele G Stavenga,et al.  Functional optics of glossy buttercup flowers , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[32]  Innes C Cuthill,et al.  Background complexity and the detectability of camouflaged targets by birds and humans , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Contrast, contours and the confusion effect in dazzle camouflage , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[34]  S. Goodman,et al.  Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations , 2016, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[35]  Marcus R. Munafò,et al.  Dynamic Dazzle Distorts Speed Perception , 2016, PloS one.

[36]  Jenny Read,et al.  Insect stereopsis demonstrated using a 3D insect cinema , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Jenny C. A. Read,et al.  The contrast sensitivity function of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola , 2015, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[38]  T. W. Pike Interference coloration as an anti-predator defence , 2015, Biology Letters.

[39]  R. W. Kentridge,et al.  The perception of gloss: A review , 2015, Vision Research.

[40]  D. Curran‐Everett,et al.  The fickle P value generates irreproducible results , 2015, Nature Methods.

[41]  Geoffrey I N Waterhouse,et al.  A nanostructural basis for gloss of avian eggshells , 2015, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  K. Lunau,et al.  Gloss, Colour and Grip: Multifunctional Epidermal Cell Shapes in Bee- and Bird-Pollinated Flowers , 2014, PloS one.

[43]  C. Mobley,et al.  The asymmetry of the underwater horizontal light field and its implications for mirror‐based camouflage in silvery pelagic fish , 2014 .

[44]  Martin Stevens,et al.  Motion dazzle and the effects of target patterning on capture success , 2014, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[45]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[46]  Chris M Herdman,et al.  Disruptive camouflage impairs object recognition , 2013, Biology Letters.

[47]  R. Santer Motion dazzle: a locust's eye view , 2013, Biology Letters.

[48]  F. Prete,et al.  Visual stimulus characteristics that elicit tracking and striking in the praying mantises Parasphendale affinis, Popa spurca and Sphodromantis lineola , 2013, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[49]  Gavin J. Svenson,et al.  Visual stimuli that elicit visual tracking, approaching and striking behavior from an unusual praying mantis, Euchomenella macrops (Insecta: Mantodea). , 2012, Journal of insect physiology.

[50]  A. Ellis,et al.  A Technique for Measuring Petal Gloss, with Examples from the Namaqualand Flora , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Motion dazzle and camouflage as distinct anti-predator defenses , 2011, BMC Biology.

[52]  L. D’Alba,et al.  What makes a feather shine? A nanostructural basis for glossy black colours in feathers , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[53]  R. Baddeley,et al.  Dazzle Camouflage Affects Speed Perception , 2011, PloS one.

[54]  F. Prete,et al.  Visual stimuli that elicit appetitive behaviors in three morphologically distinct species of praying mantis , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[55]  M. W. Butler,et al.  A novel method for quantifying the glossiness of animals , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[56]  Jean-Pol Vigneron,et al.  Gold bugs and beyond: a review of iridescence and structural colour mechanisms in beetles (Coleoptera) , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[57]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[58]  S. Merilaita,et al.  Animal camouflage: current issues and new perspectives , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  Graeme D Ruxton,et al.  Dazzle coloration and prey movement , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[61]  Nina Stobbe,et al.  Disruptive coloration provides camouflage independent of background matching , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Disruptive contrast in animal camouflage , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  J. Vincent,et al.  Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. , 2004, Arthropod structure & development.

[64]  R. Kirk Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come , 1996 .

[65]  T. Iwasaki Predatory behavior of the praying mantis,Tenodera aridifolia II. Combined effect of prey size and predator size on the prey recognition , 1991, Journal of Ethology.

[66]  W. Nentwig,et al.  Comparative investigations into the feeding ecology of six Mantodea species , 1991, Oecologia.

[67]  Samuel Rossel,et al.  Regional differences in photoreceptor performance in the eye of the praying mantis , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[68]  H. Maldonado A learning process in the praying mantis. , 1972, Physiology & behavior.

[69]  Charles Sontag,et al.  Spectral Sensitivity Studies on the Visual System of the Praying Mantis, Tenodera sinensis , 1971, The Journal of general physiology.

[70]  Karl Kral,et al.  In the Mind of a Hunter: The Visual World of Praying Mantis , 2004 .

[71]  F. Prete,et al.  Stimulus speed and order of presentation effect the visually released predatory behaviors of the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola (Burr.). , 1993, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[72]  H. Maldonado,et al.  The dynamics of learning in the praying mantis (Stagmatoptera biocellata) , 1979 .

[73]  A. C. Neville,et al.  Metallic gold and silver colours in some insect cuticles , 1977 .

[74]  Eric Denton,et al.  Reflectors in Fishes , 1971 .

[75]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Prey recognition in the praying mantis , 1959 .

[76]  N. Tindale Review of Australian Mantidae , 1923 .

[77]  D. Stuart-Fox,et al.  Pretty Cool Beetles: Can Manipulation of Visible and Near-Infrared Sunlight Prevent Overheating? , 2022 .