Two Routes to Influence: Integrating Leader-Member Exchange and Social Network Perspectives

We develop and test a model of the relational antecedents of members' influence in organizations that is based on an integration of leader-member exchange (LMX) and social network perspectives on individuals in organizations. We focus on how the relationships between LMX and members' centrality in the advice network and influence depend on two factors: the extent to which members share ties with their leaders in the organization's trust network, which we define as sponsorship, and the centrality of their leaders in the advice network. Our model seeks to explain how sponsorship and leaders' centrality shape the influence members gain by virtue of their LMX relationships and their centrality in advice networks. Longitudinal data gathered from two organizations, using survey and network measures, offer strong support for a nuanced model of the relational antecedents of influence. Both LMX and members' advice centrality are related to influence, but those relationships in turn depend on sponsorship and leaders' centrality. When leaders are high in centrality, sharing ties in the trust network is beneficial: the relationship between members' own advice centrality and influence is positive among members who are high in sponsorship. But when leaders are low in centrality, sharing trust ties is detrimental: the relationship between advice centrality and influence is negative among members who are high in sponsorship and positive among members who are low in sponsorship.

[1]  Mary Uhl-Bien,et al.  Reciprocity in Manager-Subordinate Relationships: Components, Configurations, and Outcomes , 2003 .

[2]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Exploring the Social Ledger: Negative Relationships and Negative Asymmetry in Social Networks in Organizations , 2006 .

[3]  T. Newcomb.  The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[4]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[5]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .

[6]  Ronald J. Deluga,et al.  The Role of Subordinate Performance and Ingratiation in Leader-Member Exchanges , 1994 .

[7]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[8]  George B. Graen,et al.  Role of leadership in the employee withdrawal process. , 1982 .

[9]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Process and Structure in Leader-Member Exchange , 1997 .

[10]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network str , 1990 .

[11]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  The Stability of American Markets , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  G. Graen,et al.  The effects of leader–member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. , 1982 .

[13]  Maria L. Kraimer,et al.  A Social Capital Theory of Career Success , 2001 .

[14]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[15]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[16]  R. Liden,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support And Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective , 1997 .

[17]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[18]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: a longitudinal case study , 1993 .

[19]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[21]  R. Burt.  THE GENDER OF SOCIAL CAPITAL , 1998 .

[22]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. , 1997 .

[23]  Monica C. Higgins,et al.  Constellations and Careers: Toward Understanding the Effects of Multiple Developmental Relationships , 2001 .

[24]  George B. Graen,et al.  When managers decide not to decide autocratically: An investigation of leader–member exchange and decision influence. , 1986 .

[25]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[26]  R. Liden,et al.  Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development , 1998 .

[27]  Randall P. Settoon,et al.  Social Exchange in Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support, Leader-Member Exchange, and Employee Reciprocity , 1996 .

[28]  John M. Maslyn,et al.  Multidimensionafity of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development , 1998 .

[29]  G. Graen,et al.  A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach , 1975 .

[30]  William J. Haga,et al.  A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process , 1975 .

[31]  William J. Haga,et al.  Organizational understructure and leadership: A longitudinal investigation of the managerial role-making process , 1976 .

[32]  G. Graen,et al.  Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. , 1987 .

[33]  M. Zelen,et al.  Rethinking centrality: Methods and examples☆ , 1989 .

[34]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[35]  G. Graen,et al.  Japanese management progress: Mobility into middle management. , 1988 .

[36]  H. Ibarra.  NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES , 1993 .

[37]  G. Graen,et al.  Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. , 1980 .

[38]  Jeffrey T. Polzer,et al.  Friends in High Places: The Effects of Social Networks on Discrimination in Salary Negotiations , 2000 .

[39]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[40]  Kathy E. Kram,et al.  Reconceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Developmental Network Perspective , 2001 .

[41]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[42]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  STRUCTURE, ACTION, AND OUTCOMES: THE DYNAMICS OF POWER IN SOCIAL EXCHANGE* , 1990 .

[43]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[44]  R. Burt.  The Network Structure Of Social Capital , 2000 .

[45]  Ajay Mehra,et al.  The Social Networks of High and Low Self-Monitors: Implications for Workplace Performance , 2001 .

[46]  D. Duchon,et al.  Vertical dyad linkage: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. , 1986 .

[47]  G. Graen,et al.  Effects of Linking-Pin Quality on the Quality of Working Life of Lower Participants. , 1977 .

[48]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of third-party relationships on interpersonal trust. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  James N. Baron,et al.  Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace , 1997 .

[50]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Two Indirect Tactics of Image Management: Basking and Blasting , 1980 .

[51]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[52]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .