An application of Thompson's typology to TQM in service firms

Abstract This work is based on the premise that service firms are different. The involvement of customers in the provision of services not only creates an uncertainty that makes service organizations different from manufacturing firms, but, within the broad classification of service organizations, they can also be different from each other. In line with previous research on service firms, we use Thompson's [Thompson, J.D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill] typology of interdependence (pooled, sequential, and reciprocal) as a useful framework for addressing those differences. We deduce that components of TQM content and TQM process should vary according to an organization's degree of interdependence if output uncertainty, expressed in terms of service quality, is to be minimized. Thus, the success of TQM in service organizations is dependent upon the fit among interdependence and the strategy's content and process.

[1]  Charles G. Partlow,et al.  How Ritz-Carlton Applies “TQM” , 1993 .

[2]  P. Bak,et al.  Learning from mistakes , 1997, Neuroscience.

[3]  Lionel P. Robert,et al.  Leadership in authoring the quality management literature , 1997 .

[4]  Bruce J. Avolio,et al.  Biography and the Assessment of Transformational Leadership at the World-Class Level , 1987 .

[5]  R. Joss.  Converging implementation strategies in commercial TQM initiatives: implications for the NHS. , 1994, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[6]  TQM is key to improving services, but it's not for every hospital. , 1991 .

[7]  K. Newman,et al.  Banking on people , 1995 .

[8]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Managing corporate culture through reward systems , 1987 .

[9]  R. Joss,et al.  What makes for successful TQM in the NHS? , 1994, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[10]  Helen E. Watson,et al.  TQM and Services: Implementing Change in the NHS , 1992 .

[11]  E. O'Connor,et al.  Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation. , 1995, Health services research.

[12]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[13]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on Quality by Design: The New Steps for Planning Quality into Goods and Services , 1992 .

[14]  Rikard Larsson,et al.  Organization and Customer: Managing Design and Coordination of Services , 1989 .

[15]  David J. Lemak,et al.  Beyond Process: TQM Content and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[16]  D. Commerce.  Statistical abstract of the United States , 1978 .

[17]  P. Morgan,et al.  Continuous quality improvement in an acute hospital: a report of an action research project in three hospital departments. , 1994, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[18]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[19]  Paul Herbig,et al.  Forecasting: Trials and Tribulations , 1994 .

[20]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on leadership for quality : an executive handbook , 1989 .

[21]  Joseph Moses Juran.  Juran on planning for quality , 1988 .

[22]  Philip B. Crosby,et al.  Quality Is Still Free: Making Quality Certain in Uncertain Times , 1995 .

[23]  Valarie A. Zeithaml,et al.  The service-quality puzzle , 1988 .

[24]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[25]  Leonard L. Berry,et al.  Five imperatives for improving service quality , 1991 .

[26]  Thomas C. Powell,et al.  How much does industry matter ? An alternative empirical test , 1996 .

[27]  Daniel J. McCarthy,et al.  A framework for leadership in a TQM context , 1996 .

[28]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY? , 1997 .

[29]  J. Øvretveit.  Health service quality : an introduction to quality methods for health services , 1992 .