On Code Parameters and Coding Vector Representation for Practical RLNC

Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC) provides a theoretically efficient method for coding. The drawbacks associated with it are the complexity of the decoding and the overhead resulting from the encoding vector. Increasing the field size and generation length presents a fundamental trade-off between packet-based throughput and operational overhead. On the one hand, decreasing the probability of redundant packets' being transmitted is beneficial for throughput and, consequently, reduces transmission energy. On the other hand, the decoding complexity and amount of header overhead increase with field size and generation length, leading to higher energy consumption. The main findings of this work are bounds for the transmission overhead due to linearly dependent packets. The optimal trade-off is system and topology dependent, as it depends on the cost in energy of performing coding operations versus transmitting data. We show that moderate field sizes are the correct choice when trade-offs are considered. The results show that sparse binary codes perform the best, unless the generation size is very low.

[1]  R. Koetter,et al.  The benefits of coding over routing in a randomized setting , 2003, IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2003. Proceedings..

[2]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Systematic network coding for time-division duplexing , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[3]  J. Heide,et al.  Network Coding for Mobile Devices - Systematic Binary Random Rateless Codes , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops.

[4]  Chuan Wu,et al.  UUSee: Large-Scale Operational On-Demand Streaming with Random Network Coding , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Hung-Yu Wei,et al.  Pseudo Random Network Coding Design for IEEE 802.16m Enhanced Multicast and Broadcast Service , 2010, 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[6]  Xiaowen Chu,et al.  Massively Parallel Network Coding on GPUs , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Performance, Computing and Communications Conference.

[7]  M. Medard,et al.  On Delay Performance Gains From Network Coding , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[8]  Feller William,et al.  An Introduction To Probability Theory And Its Applications , 1950 .

[9]  Xin Wang,et al.  Nuclei: GPU-Accelerated Many-Core Network Coding , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[10]  Rudolf Ahlswede,et al.  Network information flow , 2000, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[11]  Baochun Li,et al.  Parallelized Progressive Network Coding With Hardware Acceleration , 2007, 2007 Fifteenth IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service.

[12]  P. A. P. Moran,et al.  An introduction to probability theory , 1968 .

[13]  William Feller,et al.  An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications , 1967 .

[14]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  Random Linear Network Coding For Time Division Duplexing: When To Stop Talking And Start Listening , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.