Carbon Neutrality Target in Turkey: Measuring the Impact of Technological Innovation and Structural Change

[1]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Asymmetric effect of structural change and renewable energy consumption on carbon emissions: designing an SDG framework for Turkey , 2022, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[2]  S. Kamel,et al.  Drivers of environmental degradation in Turkey: Designing an SDG framework through advanced quantile approaches , 2022, Energy Reports.

[3]  S. Kamel,et al.  The dynamic impact of biomass and natural resources on ecological footprint in BRICS economies: A quantile regression evidence , 2022, Energy Reports.

[4]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[5]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli,et al.  Load Capacity Factor and Financial Globalization in Brazil: The Role of Renewable Energy and Urbanization , 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[6]  Cem Işık,et al.  Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: A novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting , 2021, Resources Policy.

[7]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does interaction between technological innovation and natural resource rent impact environmental degradation in newly industrialized countries? New evidence from method of moments quantile regression , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  The role of economic complexity in the environmental Kuznets curve of MINT economies: evidence from method of moments quantile regression , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[9]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on CO2 emissions: evidence from Portugal , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  Munir Ahmad,et al.  Linking energy transitions, energy consumption, and environmental sustainability in OECD countries , 2021, Gondwana Research.

[11]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  Exploring the impact of tourism and energy consumption on the load capacity factor in Turkey: a novel dynamic ARDL approach , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[12]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Is there a tradeoff between financial globalization, economic growth, and environmental sustainability? An advanced panel analysis , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[13]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[14]  Mohd Arshad Ansari,et al.  Do tourism development and structural change promote environmental quality? Evidence from India , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[15]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Consumption-based carbon emissions in Mexico: An analysis using the dual adjustment approach , 2021, Sustainable Production and Consumption.

[16]  A. Caglar,et al.  Analysing the ecological footprint in EU-5 countries under a scenario of carbon neutrality: Evidence from newly developed sharp and smooth structural breaks in unit root testing. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  F. Bekun,et al.  Exploring the role of conventional energy consumption on environmental quality in Brazil: Evidence from cointegration and conditional causality , 2021 .

[18]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The influences of renewable electricity generation, technological innovation, financial development, and economic growth on ecological footprints in ASEAN-5 countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[19]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  Assessing the impacts of ageing and natural resource extraction on carbon emissions: A proposed policy framework for European economies , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  Zhilun Jiao,et al.  How energy consumption, industrial growth, urbanization, and CO2 emissions affect economic growth in Pakistan? A novel dynamic ARDL simulations approach , 2021 .

[21]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[22]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  An asymmetric spillover between China and Pakistan’ stock markets: a comparative analysis before and during COVID-19 crisis , 2021, Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment.

[23]  Anwar Khan,et al.  Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries , 2021 .

[24]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Sustainability of the Moderating Role of Financial Development in the Determinants of Environmental Degradation: Evidence from Turkey , 2021, Sustainability.

[25]  O. Usman,et al.  Energy mix outlook and the EKC hypothesis in BRICS countries: a perspective of economic freedom vs. economic growth , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[26]  N. Leitão,et al.  Fresh Validation of the Low Carbon Development Hypothesis under the EKC Scheme in Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain , 2021 .

[27]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence , 2020, Sustainable Development.

[28]  Abdulai Abdul Majeed,et al.  The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation , 2020 .

[29]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does globalization matter for ecological footprint in Turkey? Evidence from dual adjustment approach , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[30]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Analyzing nonlinear impact of economic growth drivers on CO2 emissions: Designing an SDG framework for India , 2020 .

[31]  N. Leitão,et al.  The Linkage between Economic Growth, Renewable Energy, Tourism, CO2 Emissions, and International Trade: The Evidence for the European Union , 2020, Energies.

[32]  K. Sohag,et al.  A cointegration analysis of structural change, international tourism and energy consumption on CO2 emission in Pakistan , 2020 .

[33]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions?Cross-country evidence , 2020 .

[34]  Daniel Balsalobre-lorente,et al.  The dynamic effects of globalization process in analysing N-shaped tourism led growth hypothesis , 2020, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.

[35]  O. Usman,et al.  Role of renewable energy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: implications for environmental sustainability , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[36]  F. Bekun,et al.  Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: Does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies? , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[37]  Inam Ur Rahman,et al.  Do technology and structural changes favour environment in Malaysia: an ARDL-based evidence for environmental Kuznets curve , 2019, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[38]  Aviral Kumar Tiwari,et al.  The role of ICT and financial development in CO2 emissions and economic growth , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[39]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Investigating the non-linear relationship between urbanization and CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis , 2019, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health.

[40]  Emmanuel B. Boateng,et al.  Modelling carbon emission intensity: Application of artificial neural network , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[41]  I. Hanif,et al.  Fossil fuels, foreign direct investment, and economic growth have triggered CO2 emissions in emerging Asian economies: Some empirical evidence , 2019, Energy.

[42]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  The Long-Term Effect of Economic Growth, Energy Innovation, Energy Use on Environmental Quality , 2019, Energy and Environmental Strategies in the Era of Globalization.

[43]  Andrew Q. Philips,et al.  Cointegration Testing and Dynamic Simulations of Autoregressive Distributed Lag Models , 2018, The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata.

[44]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Empirical study of the Environmental Kuznets curve and Environmental Sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[45]  I. Hossain,et al.  Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, CO2 Emission and Economic Growth: Comparative Analysis between China and India , 2018 .

[46]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? , 2018 .

[47]  M. Azam,et al.  The dynamic relationship between structural change and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegrating approach , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[48]  Eyup Dogan,et al.  Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy , 2016 .

[49]  Ilhan Ozturk,et al.  Energy consumption, CO2 emissions, economic growth, and foreign trade relationship in Cyprus and Malta , 2016 .

[50]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  الهدم الخلاق Creative Destruction , 2014 .

[51]  B. Saboori,et al.  Environmental degradation, economic growth and energy consumption: Evidence of the environmental Kuznets curve in Malaysia , 2013 .

[52]  Aviral Kumar Tiwari,et al.  The environmental Kuzents Curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy , 2012 .

[53]  Juha Itkonen.  Problems estimating the carbon Kuznets curve , 2012 .

[54]  M. Ashena,et al.  Economic growth, CO 2 emissions, and fossil fuels consumption in Iran , 2010 .

[55]  Jörg Breitung,et al.  Testing for short- and long-run causality: A frequency-domain approach , 2006 .

[56]  H. Fields.  State-dependent opioid control of pain , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[57]  Richard J. Smith,et al.  Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships , 2001 .