Global mapping of crustal and lithospheric thickness on Venus

[1] We have produced a high-resolution global admittance map of Venus using a spatiospectral localization technique, calculating 64,800 admittance spectra evenly spaced in latitude and longitude. We grouped the admittance spectra into 35 classes that we inverted for elastic, crustal, and lithospheric thickness using bottom-loading, top-loading, and short-wavelength top-loading models with long-wavelength bottom-loading (“hot spot”) models. Our best fit models identify 17 classes consistent with top loading (40% of the surface), 7 with bottom loading (39%), and 4 with a long-wavelength bottom-loading model (15%). The remaining seven classes (6% of the surface) generally had large-amplitude top-loading signatures that could not be fit with our models. For the classes that were successfully modeled the estimated range of crustal (0–90 km) and elastic thickness (0–100 km) is larger than results for most previous studies, primarily because of the incorporation of bottom loading. Nearly half of the planet has elastic thickness <20 km, which we cannot distinguish from isostasy, suggesting that these regions are tectonically inactive. A key finding is that the lithospheric properties typically vary over scales of 1000 km or less except in some plains and crustal plateau regions. Both the scale and range of crustal and elastic thickness variations indicate that Venus remains an active planet and that geologic processes may be more complex than previously recognized. In many regions the correlation with surface geology is not obvious, and this suggests that deformation of the lower lithosphere and crust may occur with little surface manifestation.

[1]  R. Phillips.  Estimating Lithospheric Properties at Atla Regio, Venus , 1994 .

[2]  Donald W. Forsyth,et al.  Subsurface loading and estimates of the flexural rigidity of continental lithosphere , 1985 .

[3]  W. Banerdt.  Support of long‐wavelength loads on Venus and implications for internal structure , 1986 .

[4]  M. Zuber,et al.  Formation of fold-and-thrust belts on Venus by thick-skinned deformation , 1995, Nature.

[5]  E. Parmentier,et al.  Mantle flow tectonics: The influence of a ductile lower crust and implications for the formation of topographic uplands on Venus , 1990 .

[6]  B. Parsons,et al.  Effect of a shallow low-viscosity zone on the formation of midplate swells , 1988 .

[7]  Steven W. Squyres,et al.  Global distribution and characteristics of coronae and related features on Venus: Implications for origin and relation to mantle processes , 1992 .

[8]  John R. Jensen,et al.  Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective , 1986 .

[9]  G. Mcgill.  Hotspot evolution and Venusian tectonic style , 1994 .

[10]  David N. Barnett,et al.  Elastic Thickness Estimates for Venus Using Line of Sight Accelerations from Magellan Cycle 5 , 2000 .

[11]  G. Foulger,et al.  Is "Hotspot" Volcanism a Consequence of Plate Tectonics? , 2003, Science.

[12]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  Some effects of a dry crustal flow law on numerical simulations of coupled crustal deformation and mantle convection on Venus , 1995 .

[13]  S. Smrekar.  Evidence for active hotspots on Venus from analysis of Magellan gravity data , 1994 .

[14]  Squyres,et al.  Plains Tectonism on Venus: The Deformation Belts of Lavinia Planitia , 2022 .

[15]  Nicolas Viovy,et al.  Automatic Classification of Time Series (ACTS): A new clustering method for remote sensing time series , 2000 .

[16]  Carl Bowin,et al.  The relationship between bathymetry and gravity in the Atlantic Ocean , 1976 .

[17]  S. Smrekar,et al.  Admittance Survey of Type 1 Coronae on Venus: Implications for Elastic Thickness , 2004 .

[18]  Sean C. Solomon,et al.  Localization of gravity and topography: constraints on the tectonics and mantle dynamics of Venus , 1997 .

[19]  Mark A. Richards,et al.  A conceptual model for the relationship between coronae and large-scale mantle dynamics on Venus , 2003 .

[20]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction , 1999 .

[21]  J W Head,et al.  Internal structure and early thermal evolution of Mars from Mars Global Surveyor topography and gravity. , 2000, Science.

[22]  S. Smrekar,et al.  Corona Formation and Heat Loss on Venus by Coupled Upwelling and Delamination , 1997 .

[23]  B. Hager,et al.  Geoid anomalies and dynamic topography from convection in cylindrical geometry - Applications to mantle plumes on earth and Venus , 1992 .

[24]  W. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1987 .

[25]  Raymond E. Arvidson,et al.  Impact craters and Venus resurfacing history , 1992 .

[26]  M. Zuber,et al.  Plains Tectonics on Venus , 1996 .

[27]  Peter G. Ford,et al.  An Improved 360 Degree and Order Model of Venus Topography , 1999 .

[28]  R. Grimm.  Recent deformation rates on Venus , 1994 .

[29]  S. Smrekar,et al.  A gravity survey of Type 2 coronae on Venus , 2003 .

[30]  S. Smrekar,et al.  Laufey Regio: A newly discovered topographic rise on Venus , 2004 .

[31]  G. Schubert,et al.  Flexural ridges, trenches, and outer rises around coronae on Venus , 1992 .

[32]  M. McNutt.  Influence of plate subduction on isostatic compensation in northern California , 1983 .

[33]  R. Phillips,et al.  Gravity/topography admittance inversion on Venus using niching genetic algorithms , 2003 .

[34]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  Mantle-flow tectonics and the origin of Ishtar Terra, Venus , 1990 .

[35]  R. Phillips,et al.  Relaxation of compensated topography and the evolution of crustal plateaus on Venus , 2004 .

[36]  M. Zuber,et al.  Effective Elastic Thicknesses of the Lithosphere and Mechanisms of Isostatic Compensation in Australia , 1989 .

[37]  Frederik J. Simons,et al.  Isostatic response of the Australian lithosphere: Estimation of effective elastic thickness and anisotropy using multitaper spectral analysis , 2000 .

[38]  W. Kiefer,et al.  Mantle and crustal structure in Phoebe Regio and Devana Chasma, Venus , 2003 .

[39]  R. Phillips,et al.  Convection‐driven subsolidus crustal thickening on Venus , 1996 .

[40]  M. McNutt.  Thermal and mechanical properties of the Cape Verde Rise , 1988 .

[41]  S. Smrekar,et al.  Origin of Corona-Dominated Topographic Rises on Venus , 1999 .

[42]  B. Hager,et al.  A mantle plume model for the equatorial highlands of Venus , 1991 .

[43]  K. Lambeck,et al.  Gravity fields of the terrestrial planets: Long‐wavelength anomalies and tectonics , 1980 .

[44]  Geoffrey H. Ball,et al.  ISODATA, A NOVEL METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PATTERN CLASSIFICATION , 1965 .

[45]  A. Konopliv,et al.  Venus Gravity: 180th Degree and Order Model , 1999 .

[46]  S. Smrekar,et al.  The interaction of mantle plumes with surface thermal and chemical boundary layers: Applications to hotspots on Venus , 1996 .

[47]  C. Petit,et al.  Flexure and mechanical behavior of cratonic lithosphere: Gravity models of the East African and Baikal rifts , 2000 .

[48]  R. Phillips,et al.  Anatomy of a Venusian hot spot - Geology, gravity, and mantle dynamics of Eistla Regio , 1992 .

[49]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes , 1990 .

[50]  P. C. Hess,et al.  Chemical dieferentiation of a convecting planetary interior: Consequences for a one plate planet such as Venus , 1992 .

[51]  C. Sotin,et al.  The effect of the transformation of basalt to eclogite on the internal dynamics of Venus , 1995 .

[52]  R. Phillips,et al.  Venusian highlands: Geoid to topography ratios and their implications: Earth and Planetary Science L , 1991 .

[53]  S. Smrekar,et al.  LARGE VOLCANIC RISES ON VENUS , 2022, Venus II.

[54]  L. Dorman,et al.  Experimental isostasy: 1. Theory of the determination of the Earth's isostatic response to a concentrated load , 1970 .

[55]  S. Smrekar,et al.  Large topographic rises, coronae, large flow fields, and large volcanoes on Venus: Evidence for mantle plumes? , 2005 .

[56]  The Isostatic State of Mead Crater , 1994 .

[57]  W. M. Kaula,et al.  Coldspots and hotspots - Global tectonics and mantle dynamics of Venus , 1992 .

[58]  F. Nimmo,et al.  Elastic Thickness Estimates for Venus from Line of Sight Accelerations , 1997 .

[59]  David N. Barnett,et al.  Flexure of Venusian Lithosphere Measured from Residual Topography , 2000 .

[60]  Peter Grindrod,et al.  Preliminary analysis of an expanded corona database for Venus , 2001 .

[61]  S. Solomon,et al.  Global Variations in the Geoid/Topography Admittance of Venus , 1994, Science.

[62]  James J. Willis,et al.  TECTONIC OVERVIEW AND SYNTHESIS , 2022, Venus II.

[63]  D. Kohlstedt,et al.  High‐temperature deformation of dry diabase with application to tectonics on Venus , 1998 .

[64]  James W. Head,et al.  Corona structures on Venus: Models of origin , 1987 .

[65]  D. Senske,et al.  Large Topographic Rises on Venus: Implications for Mantle , 1995 .

[66]  G. Schubert,et al.  Gravity over Coronae and Chasmata on Venus , 1994 .

[67]  M. McNutt,et al.  Constraints on thermal and mechanical structure of the oceanic lithosphere at the Bermuda Rise from geoid height and depth anomalies , 1989 .

[68]  R. Phillips,et al.  Blob tectonics: A prediction for Western Aphrodite Terra, Venus , 1990 .

[69]  V. Hamilton,et al.  The Geomorphology and Evolution of Hecate Chasma, Venus , 1996 .

[70]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Lithospheric flexure on Venus , 1994 .

[71]  M. Malin,et al.  Hot-Spot Evolution and the Global Tectonics of Venus , 1991, Science.