Evaluation of Touchable 3D‐Printed Replicas in Museums

The multisensory aspect of the museum, while neglected for many years, is undergoing a resurgence as museum workers have begun to push towards re-establishing the senses as a major component of museum pedagogy. However, for many museums a major roadblock lies in the need to conserve rare objects, a need that prevents visitors from being able to interact with many objects in a meaningful way. This issue can be potentially overcome by the rapidly evolving field of 3D printing, which allows museum visitors to handle authentic replicas without damaging the originals. However, little is known about how museum visitors consider this approach, how they understand it and whether these surrogates are welcome within museums. A front-end evaluation of this approach is presented, finding that visitors were enthusiastic about interacting with touchable 3D printed replicas, highlighting potential educational benefits among other considerations. Suggestions about the presentation of touchable 3D printed replicas are also discussed.

[1]  Adeline Le Cabec,et al.  Impacts of curatorial and research practices on the preservation of fossil hominid remains. , 2017, Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS.

[2]  David Bell.  Aesthetic encounters and learning in the museum , 2017 .

[3]  Anne E Chick,et al.  Co-creating an accessible, multisensory exhibition with the National Centre for Craft & Design and blind and partially sighted participants , 2017 .

[4]  M. A. Williams,et al.  Utilizing X-ray computed tomography for heritage conservation: The case of Megalosaurus bucklandii , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC).

[5]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Digital Fabrication Techniques for Cultural Heritage: A Survey , 2017, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  Ludovico Solima,et al.  Do Not Touch! How 3d Printing can open the way to an accessible museum! , 2016 .

[7]  Peter Ride,et al.  Redefining Access: Embracing multimodality, memorability and shared experience in Museums , 2016 .

[8]  Maria João Carneiro,et al.  Accessibility of European museums to visitors with visual impairments , 2016 .

[9]  Leonie Hannan,et al.  Engaging the Past: Haptics and Object-Based Learning in Multiple Dimensions , 2016 .

[10]  Daniela Petrelli,et al.  Using Tangible Smart Replicas as Controls for an Interactive Museum Exhibition , 2016, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[11]  Chen-Wo Kuo,et al.  New Media Display Technology and Exhibition Experience , 2016 .

[12]  Christina Kreps.  University Museums as Laboratories for Experiential Learning and Engaged Practice , 2015 .

[13]  Richard J. Bibb,et al.  Application of Clinical Imaging and 3D Printing to the Identification of Anomalies in an Ancient Egyptian Animal Mummy , 2015 .

[14]  Daniel Pletinckx,et al.  Tangible interfaces for digital museum applications , 2015, 2015 Digital Heritage.

[15]  Ane Pilegaard,et al.  Material Proximity: Experimenting with Material Strategies in Spatial Exhibition Design , 2015 .

[16]  Paola Di Giuseppantonio Di Franco,et al.  3D Printing and Immersive Visualization for Improved Perception of Ancient Artifacts , 2015, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[17]  Anton du Plessis,et al.  Three-dimensional model of an ancient Egyptian falcon mummy skeleton , 2015 .

[18]  Charles Cronin.  3D Printing: Cultural Property as Intellectual Property , 2015 .

[19]  John Reeve,et al.  Learning, Education, and Public Programs in Museums and Galleries , 2015 .

[20]  J. Baker.  Anarchical Artifacts: Museums as Sites for Radical Otherness , 2015 .

[21]  Sandra H. Dudley.  What, or Where, Is the (Museum) Object?: Colonial Encounters in Displayed Worlds of Things , 2015 .

[22]  A. Witcomb.  Toward a pedagogy of feeling: understanding how museums create a space for cross-cultural encounters , 2015 .

[23]  K. Hetherington.  Accountability and disposal: visual impairment and the museum , 2015 .

[24]  Ehsan Farjood,et al.  Rapid Prototyping Technologies and their Applications in Prosthodontics, a Review of Literature , 2015, Journal of dentistry.

[25]  Caterina Balletti,et al.  TOOTEKO: A CASE STUDY OF AUGMENTED REALITY FOR AN ACCESSIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE. DIGITIZATION, 3D PRINTING AND SENSORS FOR AN AUDIO-TACTILE EXPERIENCE , 2015 .

[26]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .

[27]  Stephen D. Laycock,et al.  Using a Combination of Micro--Computed Tomography, CAD and 3D Printing Techniques to Reconstruct Incomplete 19th-Century Cantonese Chess Pieces , 2015, ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage.

[28]  Brandon R. Olson,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL THREE-DIMENSIONAL PRINTING OF A LOWER PALAEOLITHIC HANDAXE: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE TECHNOLOGY AND ANALYTICAL VALUE , 2014 .

[29]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  Digital Fabrication Technologies for Cultural Heritage (STAR) , 2014, GCH.

[30]  Andreas Reichinger,et al.  3D Printing for Cultural Heritage: Preservation, Accessibility, Research and Education , 2014, 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage.

[31]  Stephan Schwan,et al.  Perception and evaluation of authentic objects: findings from a visitor study , 2014 .

[32]  Mark Wright,et al.  Touching the Past: Haptic Augmented Reality for Museum Artefacts , 2014, HCI.

[33]  R. Stevenson.  The Forgotten sense: using olfaction in a museum context : a neuroscience perspective , 2014 .

[34]  Marija Brajčić,et al.  Learning at the Museum , 2013 .

[35]  D.V.Mahindru,et al.  Review of Rapid Prototyping-Technology for the Future , 2013 .

[36]  J. Rae,et al.  From the Mind’s Eye: Museum and Art Gallery Appreciation for the Blind -- Canadian Perspectives , 2013 .

[37]  P. Schorch.  Cultural feelings and the making of meaning , 2014 .

[38]  Imran A. Rahman,et al.  Virtual Fossils: a New Resource for Science Communication in Paleontology , 2012, Evolution: Education and Outreach.

[39]  Sandra H. Dudley.  Museum Objects: Experiencing the Properties of Things , 2012 .

[40]  M. Williams,et al.  Effect of X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanning Parameters on the Estimated Porosity of Foam Specimens , 2011 .

[41]  R. L. Abel,et al.  Digital preservation and dissemination of ancient lithic technology with modern micro-CT , 2011, Comput. Graph..

[42]  Adam Metallo,et al.  The Future of Three‐Dimensional Imaging and Museum Applications , 2011 .

[43]  D. Bearman.  3D Representations in Museums , 2011 .

[44]  Art, Museums and Touch , 2010 .

[45]  Sandra H. Dudley.  Museum materialities: objects, sense and feeling , 2009 .

[46]  John Zimmerman,et al.  User experience over time: an initial framework , 2009, CHI.

[47]  Tom Wellings,et al.  Customer perception of switch-feel in luxury sports utility vehicles , 2008 .

[48]  Helen J. Chatterjee,et al.  Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling , 2008 .

[49]  Francesca De Crescenzio,et al.  3D restitution, restoration and prototyping of a medieval damaged skull , 2008 .

[50]  Evangelos Karapanos,et al.  User experience over time , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[51]  E. Pye.  The power of touch: handling objects in museum and heritage context , 2008 .

[52]  Fiona Candlin.  Museums, Modernity and the Class Politics of Touching Objects , 2008 .

[53]  Fiona Candlin,et al.  The Dubious Inheritance of Touch: Art History and Museum Access , 2006 .

[54]  Fiona Candlin,et al.  Blindness, Art and Exclusion in Museums and Galleries , 2003 .

[55]  S. Paris.  Perspectives on Object-Centered Learning in Museums , 2002 .

[56]  Klaus Müller.  Museums and Virtuality , 2002 .

[57]  K. Hetherington,et al.  Museums and the Visually Impaired: The Spatial Politics of Access , 2000 .

[58]  John W. Bohn.  Museums and the culture of autography , 1999 .

[59]  W. Lindsay,et al.  Displaying Dinosaurs at The Natural History Museum, London , 1996 .

[60]  R. Hartfield.  Challenging the Context: Perception, Polity, and Power , 1994 .

[61]  Betty M. Davidson,et al.  Increased Exhibit Accessibility Through Multisensory Interaction , 1991 .

[62]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[63]  Anne P. Taylor.  Children and Artifacts—A Replacement for Textbook Learning , 1973 .

[64]  Eric Larrabee,et al.  Museums and Education , 1968, Nature.

[65]  The Museums Association , 1890, Nature.