Effects of neighborhood types & socio-demographics on activity space

This paper examines the relationships between socio-demographic characteristics, travel time, the built environment and resulting average activity spaces for all activities and non-work activities separately using data from the 2012 Northeast Ohio Regional Travel Survey. Multiple regression models are developed to analyze these relationships at individual level. First K-means cluster analysis is conducted to create seven neighborhood types based on five built environment variables. These new neighborhood types are used as discrete explanatory variables to explain average activity spaces, while controlling for travel time, individual and household features, access to transit facilities and the job-population balance. The modeling results indicate that residential location characteristics have significant influences on activity spaces. People living in places away from suburban and rural areas and with a high mix of population and employment tend to have smaller activity spaces. Moreover, this study finds out that while the effects of some explanatory variables (such as age and gender) vary for all activities and non-work activities, socially disadvantaged people (such as the elderly and low income households) generally experience smaller activity spaces.

[1]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[2]  Louis A. Merlin,et al.  Longitudinal Analysis of Adolescent Girls' Activity Patterns: Understanding the Influence of the Transition to Licensure. , 2016, Journal of transport and land use.

[3]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  A GIS toolkit for exploring geographies of household activity/travel behavior , 2006 .

[4]  Arefeh A. Nasri,et al.  How built environment affects travel behavior: A comparative analysis of the connections between land use and vehicle miles traveled in US cities , 2012 .

[5]  Stefan Schönfelder Some notes on space, location and travel behaviour , 2001 .

[6]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  What makes travel 'local': Defining and understanding local travel behaviour , 2012 .

[7]  Fahui Wang,et al.  Urban land uses, socio-demographic attributes and commuting: A multilevel modeling approach , 2011 .

[8]  T. Litman Evaluating Accessibility for Transportation Planning , 2007 .

[9]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[10]  K. Lynch Good city form , 1984 .

[11]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[12]  Pavlos S. Kanaroglou,et al.  Urban Form and Household Activity‐Travel Behavior , 2006 .

[13]  F. E. Horton,et al.  Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Individual Behavior , 1971 .

[14]  D. Collia,et al.  The 2001 National Household Travel Survey: a look into the travel patterns of older Americans. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[15]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions , 1998 .

[16]  Martin Dijst,et al.  Two-earner families and their action spaces: A case study of two dutch communities , 1999 .

[17]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity Spaces, Biographies, Social Networks and their Welfare Gains and Externalities: Some Hypotheses and Empirical Results , 2005 .

[18]  A. El-geneidy,et al.  The effect of neighbourhood characteristics, accessibility, home–work location, and demographics on commuting distances , 2010 .

[19]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Household Travel Surveys in Context-Based Approach for Adjusting ITE Trip Generation Rates in Urban Contexts , 2012 .

[20]  Y. Kestens,et al.  Conceptualization and measurement of environmental exposure in epidemiology: accounting for activity space related to daily mobility. , 2013, Health & place.

[21]  W. Gesler,et al.  International Journal of Health Geographics a Suite of Methods for Representing Activity Space in a Healthcare Accessibility Study , 2022 .

[22]  S. Volo,et al.  Urban rhythms and travel behaviour: Spatial and temporal phenomena of daily travel , 2011 .

[23]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Activity spaces: Measures of social exclusion? , 2003 .

[24]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Planning for Accessibility: in Theory and in Practice , 2005 .

[25]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments—13-Region Study Using Consistent Built Environment Measures , 2011 .

[26]  Naomi Carmon,et al.  Policy, Planning, and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development , 2013 .

[27]  E. I. Pas,et al.  Socio-demographics, activity participation and travel behavior , 1999 .

[28]  Martin Wachs,et al.  MAKING DO: How Working Families in Seven U.S. Metropolitan Areas Trade Off Housing Costs and Commuting Times , 2006 .

[29]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[30]  Stephen A Matthews,et al.  Spatial Polygamy and Contextual Exposures (SPACEs) , 2013, The American behavioral scientist.

[31]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[32]  M. Boarnet,et al.  Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land Use Characteristics , 1996 .

[33]  Stefan Schönfelder,et al.  Capturing Human Activity Spaces , 2007 .

[34]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California , 2005 .

[35]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: A case study of Northern California , 2009 .

[36]  Irene Casas,et al.  Social Exclusion and the Disabled: An Accessibility Approach , 2007 .

[37]  Luis F. Miranda-Moreno,et al.  Modeling the Effect of Land Use on Activity Spaces , 2012 .

[38]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Distance traveled in three Canadian cities: Spatial analysis from the perspective of vulnerable population segments , 2011 .

[39]  Yingling Fan,et al.  Urban Form, Individual Spatial Footprints, and Travel , 2008 .

[40]  Doina Olaru,et al.  Geo-spatial analysis of activity spaces in a TOD environment – Tracking impacts of rail transport policy using kernel density estimation , 2011 .

[41]  Na Chen,et al.  Influence of neighborhood types on trip distances: Spatial error models for Central Ohio , 2016 .