Estimation of mean sojourn time in breast cancer screening using a Markov chain model of both entry to and exit from the preclinical detectable phase.

The sojourn time, time spent in the preclinical detectable phase (PCDP) for chronic diseases, for example, breast cancer, plays an important role in the design and assessment of screening programmes. Traditional methods to estimate it usually assume a uniform incidence rate of preclinical disease from a randomized control group or historical data. In this paper, a two-parameter Markov chain model is proposed and developed to explicitly estimate the preclinical incidence rate (lambda 1) and the rate of transition from preclinical to clinical state (lambda 2, equivalent to the inverse of mean sojourn time) without using control data. A new estimate of sensitivity is proposed, based on the estimated parameters of the Markov process. When this method is applied to the data from the Swedish two-county study of breast cancer screening in the age group 70-74, the estimate of MST is 2.3 with 95 per cent CI ranging from 2.1 to 2.5, which is close to the result based on the traditional method but the 95 per cent CI is narrower using the Markov model. The reason for the greater precision of the latter is the fuller use of all temporal data, since the continuous exact times to events are used in our method instead of grouping them as in the traditional method. Ongoing and future researches should extend this model to include, for example, the tumour size, nodal status and malignancy grade, along with methods of simultaneously estimating sensitivity and the transition rates in the Markov process.

[1]  J. Neyman,et al.  A simple stochastic model of recovery, relapse, death and loss of patients. , 1951, Human biology.

[2]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  A SEMI-MARKOV MODEL FOR CLINICAL TRIALS , 1965 .

[3]  Marvin Zelen,et al.  On the theory of screening for chronic diseases , 1969 .

[4]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Lead time in breast cancer detection and implications for periodicity of screening. , 1974, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  Philip C. Prorok,et al.  The theory of periodic screening II: doubly bounded recurrence times and mean lead time and detection probability estimation , 1976, Advances in Applied Probability.

[6]  N R Temkin,et al.  An analysis for transient states with application to tumor shrinkage. , 1978, Biometrics.

[7]  M Moskowitz,et al.  Benefit/risk analysis of aggressive mammographic screening. , 1978, Radiology.

[8]  T. Louis,et al.  Screening for the early detection of cancer— I. The temporal natural history of a progressive disease state , 1978 .

[9]  Thomas A. Louis,et al.  Screening for the early detection of cancer— III. Estimation of disease natural history☆ , 1978 .

[10]  Bengt Berlin,et al.  Testing Disease Dependence in Survival Experiments with Serial Sacrifice , 1979 .

[11]  M H Gail,et al.  Evaluating serial cancer marker studies in patients at risk of recurrent disease. , 1981, Biometrics.

[12]  P C Prorok,et al.  Lead time estimation in a controlled screening program. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  N. Day,et al.  Simplified models of screening for chronic disease: estimation procedures from mass screening programmes. , 1984, Biometrics.

[14]  Barbara McKnight,et al.  Tests for differences in tumor incidence based on animal carcinogenesis experiments , 1984 .

[15]  J P Klein,et al.  A biological marker model for predicting disease transitions. , 1984, Biometrics.

[16]  N E Day,et al.  Estimating the sensitivity of a screening test. , 1985, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[17]  R Kay,et al.  A Markov model for analysing cancer markers and disease states in survival studies. , 1986, Biometrics.

[18]  L. Tabár,et al.  What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations? An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trial. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  Fred L. Ramsey,et al.  Covariate Adjustments to Effective Area in Variable-Area Wildlife Surveys , 1987 .

[20]  N. Hadler,et al.  Prognosis in SLE: comparison of Markov model to life table analysis. , 1988, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

[21]  Mark A. Espeland,et al.  Joint Estimation of Incidence and Diagnostic Error Rates from Irregular Longitudinal Data , 1989 .

[22]  J D Habbema,et al.  A model for breast cancer screening , 1990, Cancer.

[23]  J. Habbema,et al.  A model‐based analysis of the hip project for breast cancer screening , 1990, International journal of cancer.

[24]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Age‐Specific Incidence and Prevalence: A Statistical Perspective , 1991 .

[25]  N Keiding,et al.  Assessing the influence of reversible disease indicators on survival. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  L. Tabár,et al.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. , 1992, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[27]  Niels Keiding,et al.  Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes , 1993 .

[28]  L. Sharples,et al.  Use of the Gibbs sampler to estimate transition rates between grades of coronary disease following cardiac transplantation. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.