Quantitative Evaluation of Gait Disturbance on an Instrumented Timed Up-and-go Test

Although the 3-m timed up-and-go test (TUG) is reliable for evaluating mobility, TUG time is insufficient to evaluate mild gait disturbance; we, therefore aimed to investigate other measurements with instrumented TUG (iTUG) using a free smartphone application. Our inclusion criterion in this study is only that participants can walk without any assistance. This study included three heterogeneous groups; patients who underwent a tap test or shunt surgery, 29 inpatients hospitalized for other reasons, and 87 day-care users. After the tap test, 28 were diagnosed with tap-positive idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and 8 were diagnosed with tap-negative. Additionally, 18 patients were assessed iTUG before and after shunt surgery. During iTUG, time and 3-dimensional (3D) acceleration were automatically recorded every 0.01 s. A volume of the 95% confidence ellipsoid (95%CE) of all plots for 3D acceleration was calculated. Additionally, an iTUG score was defined as (95%CE volume) 0.8 / 1.9 - 1.9 × (time) + 60. The measurement reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlations and Bland-Altman plots. The participants with mild gait disturbance who accomplished within 13.5 s on the iTUG time had the 95%CE volumes for 3D acceleration of ≥70 m3/s6 and iTUG scores of ≥50. The mean iTUG time was shortened and the mean 95%CE volumes and iTUG scores were increased after the tap test among 28 patients with tap-positive iNPH and after shunt surgery among 18 patients with definite iNPH. Conversely, the mean iTUG score among 8 patients with tap-negative was decreased after the tap test. The intraclass correlations for the time, 95%CE volume and iTUG score were 0.97, 0.80 and 0.90, respectively. Not only the iTUG time but also the 95%CE volume was important for evaluating mobility. Therefore, the novel iTUG score consisting both is useful for the quantitative assessment of mobility.

[1]  Neeraj A. Kumar,et al.  Functional Gait Assessment: Concurrent, Discriminative, and Predictive Validity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[2]  Anthony Marmarou,et al.  Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  M Illert,et al.  Gait analysis in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus – which parameters respond to the CSF tap test? , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  J. Stevens,et al.  Assessment and management of fall risk in primary care settings. , 2015, The Medical clinics of North America.

[5]  T. Brandt,et al.  Walking assessment after lumbar puncture in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a delayed improvement over 3 days. , 2017, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  F. Pinto,et al.  The Timed Up and Go Test as a Diagnostic Criterion in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[7]  K. Matre,et al.  Evaluation of Timed Up and Go Test as a tool to measure postoperative function and prediction of one year walking ability for patients with hip fracture , 2015, Clinical rehabilitation.

[8]  Patrick Boissy,et al.  Auto detection and segmentation of daily living activities during a Timed Up and Go task in people with Parkinson’s disease using multiple inertial sensors , 2017, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[9]  K. Ishii,et al.  Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. , 2012, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[10]  Frank-Erik de Leeuw,et al.  Gait in Elderly With Cerebral Small Vessel Disease , 2010, Stroke.

[11]  E. Mori,et al.  Timed up and go test at tap test and shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2017, Neurology. Clinical practice.

[12]  K. Schaller,et al.  Validity and Reliability of a Measurement of Objective Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: The Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[13]  G. Allali,et al.  A combined cognitive and gait quantification to identify normal pressure hydrocephalus from its mimics: The Geneva’s protocol , 2017, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[14]  M. Tinetti,et al.  Summary of the Updated American Geriatrics Society/british Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older Persons , 2022 .

[15]  T. Ledin,et al.  Postural function in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunt surgery: A controlled study using computerized dynamic posturography (EquiTest) , 2013, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[16]  E. Mori,et al.  The value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap test for predicting shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2012, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS.

[17]  Lynette M. Smith,et al.  Fall predictors in the community dwelling elderly: a cross sectional and prospective cohort study. , 2010, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[18]  M. Woollacott,et al.  Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. , 2000, Physical therapy.

[19]  Juan José Amer-Cuenca,et al.  Physical factors underlying the Timed "Up and Go" test in older adults. , 2016, Geriatric nursing.

[20]  Daniele Rigamonti,et al.  Objective Assessment of Gait in Normal-Pressure Hydrocephalus , 2008, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  Thu-Trang T. Hickman,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of changes in gait after extended cerebrospinal fluid drainage for normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2016, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[22]  Patrick Boissy,et al.  Auto detection and segmentation of physical activities during a Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) task in healthy older adults using multiple inertial sensors , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[23]  Denise Kendrick,et al.  Does the timed up and go test predict future falls among British community-dwelling older people? Prospective cohort study nested within a randomised controlled trial , 2015, BMC Geriatrics.

[24]  J. Maliszewski,et al.  Aging effect on the instrumented Timed-Up-and-Go test variables in nursing home women aged 80–93 years , 2017, Biogerontology.

[25]  Valentina Agostini,et al.  Instrumented gait analysis for an objective pre-/postassessment of tap test in normal pressure hydrocephalus. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Jaap H van Dieën,et al.  Intra-Rater, Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of an Instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) Test in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease , 2016, PloS one.

[27]  Early and delayed assessments of quantitative gait measures to improve the tap test as a predictor of shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus , 2016, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS.