Visual mechanisms of motion analysis and motion perception.

Psychophysical experiments on feature tracking suggest that most of our sensitivity to chromatic motion and to second-order motion depends on feature tracking. There is no reason to suppose that the visual system contains motion sensors dedicated to the analysis of second-order motion. Current psychophysical and physiological data indicate that local motion sensors are selective for orientation and spatial frequency but they do not eliminate any of the three main models-the Reichardt detector, the motion-energy filter, and gradient-based sensors. Both psychophysical and physiological data suggest that both broadly oriented and narrowly oriented motion sensors are important in the early analysis of motion in two dimensions.

[1]  E. Adelson,et al.  Directionally selective complex cells and the computation of motion energy in cat visual cortex , 1992, Vision Research.

[2]  Robert F Hess,et al.  Stereoscopic depth but not shape perception from second-order stimuli , 1999, Vision Research.

[3]  D Marr,et al.  Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  A. Derrington,et al.  Temporal resolution of dichoptic and second-order motion mechanisms , 1998, Vision Research.

[5]  Vincent P. Ferrera,et al.  Direction specific masking and the analysis of motion in two dimensions , 1987, Vision Research.

[6]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position displacement, not velocity, is the cue to motion detection of second-order stimuli , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[8]  P. McOwan,et al.  A computational model of the analysis of some first-order and second-order motion patterns by simple and complex cells , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.

[10]  Andrew T. Smith,et al.  Changes in perceived speed following adaptation to first-order and second-order motion , 1997, Vision Research.

[11]  E H Adelson,et al.  Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[12]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Motion of chromatic stimuli: First-order or second-order? , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  W. Reichardt,et al.  Autocorrelation, a principle for the evaluation of sensory information by the central nervous system , 1961 .

[14]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Psychophysical isolation of movement sensitivity by removal of familiar position cues , 1981, Vision Research.

[15]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Position-based motion perception for color and texture stimuli: effects of contrast and speed , 1999, Vision Research.

[16]  J. van Santen,et al.  Temporal covariance model of human motion perception. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  K. Turano Evidence for a Common Motion Mechanism of Luminance-Modulated and Contrast-Modulated Patterns: Selective Adaptation , 1991, Perception.

[18]  J. Movshon,et al.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  A J Ahumada,et al.  Model of human visual-motion sensing. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[20]  M. Landy,et al.  Kinetic depth effect and optic flow—I. 3D shape from Fourier motion , 1989, Vision Research.

[21]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Transparent motion from feature- and luminance-based processes , 1993, Vision Research.

[22]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  A. Derrington,et al.  Motion of contrast-modulated gratings is analysed by different mechanisms at low and at high contrasts , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  David Whitaker,et al.  Motion Adaptation Distorts Perceived Visual Position , 2002, Current Biology.

[25]  Stephen T. Hammett,et al.  Adaptation to motion of a second-order pattern: the motion aftereffect is not a general result , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Monocular motion sensing, binocular motion perception , 1989, Vision Research.

[27]  Curtis L. Baker,et al.  A motion aftereffect from an isoluminant stimulus , 1985, Vision Research.

[28]  S. Anstis,et al.  After Effect of Seen Movement: Evidence for Peripheral and Central Components , 1970, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  D. Burr,et al.  Two-dimensional spatial and spatial-frequency selectivity of motion-sensitive mechanisms in human vision. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  J. van Santen,et al.  Elaborated Reichardt detectors. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[31]  Hiroshi Ashida,et al.  A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects , 2000, Vision Research.

[32]  Chris J. Tinsley,et al.  The nature of V1 neural responses to 2D moving patterns depends on receptive-field structure in the marmoset monkey. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  David R. Badcock,et al.  The low level motion system has both chromatic and luminance inputs , 1985, Vision Research.

[34]  E. Adelson,et al.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns , 1982, Nature.

[35]  A. Johnston,et al.  A unified account of three apparent motion illusions , 1995, Vision Research.

[36]  N Osaka,et al.  Inefficient visual search for second-order motion. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns: Evidence for a second-order process , 1992, Vision Research.

[38]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  D. Heeger,et al.  Contrast normalization and a linear model for the directional selectivity of simple cells in cat striate cortex , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[40]  David H. Foster,et al.  The fine-grain movement illusion: A perceptual probe of neuronal connectivity in the human visual system , 1981, Vision Research.

[41]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Color and luminance share a common motion pathway , 1985, Vision Research.

[42]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Perceived direction of moving two-dimensional patterns depends on duration, contrast and eccentricity , 1992, Vision Research.

[43]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  The temporal range of motion sensing and motion perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[44]  J. B. Mulligan,et al.  Effect of contrast on the perceived direction of a moving plaid , 1990, Vision Research.

[45]  A. M. Derrington,et al.  Slow discrimination of contrast-defined expansion patterns , 2000, Vision Research.

[46]  S. Anstis The perception of apparent movement. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[47]  R. Addams LI. An account of a peculiar optical phænomenon seen after having looked at a moving body , 1834 .

[48]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Two-stage analysis of the motion of 2-dimensional patterns, what is the first stage? , 1992, Vision Research.

[49]  G. Sperling,et al.  The functional architecture of human visual motion perception , 1995, Vision Research.

[50]  David H. Foster,et al.  Acuity for fine-grain motion and for two-dot spacing as a function of retinal eccentricity: Differences in specialization of the central and peripheral retina , 1989, Vision Research.

[51]  Christopher P Benton Gradient-based analysis of non-Fourier motion , 2002, Vision Research.

[52]  H. Wilson,et al.  A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[53]  Luis A. Lesmes,et al.  The mechanism of isoluminant chromatic motion perception. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Correspondence-based and energy-based detection of second-order motion in human vision. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[55]  A. Derrington,et al.  Discriminating the direction of second-order motion at short stimulus durations , 1993, Vision Research.

[56]  S. Ullman,et al.  The interpretation of visual motion , 1977 .

[57]  T. Ledgeway Adaptation to second-order motion results in a motion aftereffect for directionally-ambiguous test stimuli , 1994, Vision Research.

[58]  A. Derrington,et al.  Separate detectors for simple and complex grating patterns? , 1985, Vision Research.

[59]  V. Bruce,et al.  Visual Perception: Physiology, Psychology and Ecology , 1985 .

[60]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  Different processes underlie the detection of second-order motion at low and high temporal frequencies , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  The analysis of motion of two-dimensional patterns: do Fourier components provide the first stage? , 1994, Vision Research.

[62]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Broadly oriented motion detectors in marmoset V1 respond to local features in 2-D patterns , 2003 .

[63]  Claude L. Fennema,et al.  Velocity determination in scenes containing several moving objects , 1979 .

[64]  G. Mather The Movement Aftereffect and a Distribution-Shift Model for Coding the Direction of Visual Movement , 1980, Perception.

[65]  Manuel Suero,et al.  Motion of complex patterns is computed from the perceived motions of their components , 1991, Vision Research.

[66]  A. Derrington,et al.  Second-order motion discrimination by feature-tracking , 1999, Vision Research.

[67]  Andrew M. Derrington,et al.  Rapid colour-specific detection of motion in human vision , 1996, Nature.