Reparations for people living with dementia: Recognition, accountability, change, now!

There is a significant and longstanding problem of harm to people living with dementia in long term care institutions ('LTC institutions', referred to by others as 'care homes', 'nursing homes', 'long term care', 'residential aged care facilities'), along with a failure to redress the harm or hold people accountable for this harm. This article reports on an Australian project that found reparations must be a response to harm to people living with dementia in residential aged care. Using a disability human rights methodology, focus groups were conducted with people living with dementia, care partners and family members, advocates and lawyers to explore perspectives on why and how to redress harm to people living with dementia in Australian LTC institutions. Researchers found four key themes provide the basis for the necessity and design of a reparative approach to redress - recognition, accountability, change, now. The article calls for further attention to reparations in dementia scholarship, with a particular focus on the role that can be played in the delivery of reparations by the LTC industry, dementia practitioners, and dementia scholars. Ultimately, this article provides a new understanding of responses to violence, abuse, neglect and other harms experienced by people living with dementia in LTC institutions, which centres justice, rights, and transformative change.

[1]  Jonas Ruškus Transformative Justice for Elimination of Barriers to Access to Justice for Persons with Psychosocial or Intellectual Disabilities , 2023, Laws.

[2]  J. Gallen Transitional Justice and the Historical Abuses of Church and State , 2023 .

[3]  Kristina Chelberg ‘Vulnerable Monsters’: Constructions of Dementia in the Australian Royal Commission into Aged Care , 2023, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique.

[4]  C. Loughnan The scene and the unseen: Neglect and death in immigration detention and aged care , 2022, Incarceration.

[5]  H. Brodaty,et al.  Early Implementation and Evaluation of StepUp for Dementia Research: An Australia-Wide Dementia Research Participation and Public Engagement Platform , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  Time for Reparations , 2021 .

[7]  A. Tinker,et al.  Human rights and care homes for older people: a typology of approaches from academic literature as a starting point for activist scholarship in human rights and institutional care , 2021, The International Journal of Human Rights.

[8]  L. Steele,et al.  Disability Law in a Pandemic: The Temporal Folds of Medico-legal Violence , 2021, Social & Legal Studies.

[9]  R. Herron,et al.  A Conversation about Ageism: Time to Deinstitutionalize Long-Term Care? , 2021, University of Toronto Quarterly.

[10]  Eilionóir Flynn,et al.  Introducing a Human Rights-based Disability Research Methodology , 2020 .

[11]  L. Moffett,et al.  Redressing forced sterilisation: the role of the medical profession , 2020, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  C. Valentine,et al.  A human rights approach to advocacy for people with dementia: A review of current provision in England and Wales , 2020, Dementia.

[13]  R. Fleming,et al.  Questioning Segregation of People Living with Dementia in Australia: An International Human Rights Approach to Care Homes , 2019, Laws.

[14]  Noha Ferrah,et al.  A review of coronial investigations into medication‐related deaths in residential aged care , 2018, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[15]  P. Kontos,et al.  Citizenship, human rights, and dementia: Towards a new embodied relational ethic of sexuality , 2016, Dementia.

[16]  C. Davies,et al.  'Two dead frankfurts and a blob of sauce': the serendipity of receiving nutrition and hydration in Australian residential aged care. , 2014, Collegian.

[17]  Pablo de Greiff,et al.  The handbook of reparations , 2006 .

[18]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2022, Journal of Human Rights Practice.

[19]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2021, Journal of Human Rights Practice.

[20]  K. Ervin Time for Australia to revisit antipsychotic use in dementia in residential aged care , 2019, Australasian Medical Journal.

[21]  Michalinos Zembylas,et al.  Critical Human Rights Education , 2019, Contemporary Philosophies and Theories in Education.