Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study

BACKGROUND Patients diagnosed as vegetative have periods of wakefulness, but seem to be unaware of themselves or their environment. Although functional MRI (fMRI) studies have shown that some of these patients are consciously aware, issues of expense and accessibility preclude the use of fMRI assessment in most of these individuals. We aimed to assess bedside detection of awareness with an electroencephalography (EEG) technique in patients in the vegetative state. METHODS This study was undertaken at two European centres. We recruited patients with traumatic brain injury and non-traumatic brain injury who met the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised definition of vegetative state. We developed a novel EEG task involving motor imagery to detect command-following--a universally accepted clinical indicator of awareness--in the absence of overt behaviour. Patients completed the task in which they were required to imagine movements of their right-hand and toes to command. We analysed the command-specific EEG responses of each patient for robust evidence of appropriate, consistent, and statistically reliable markers of motor imagery, similar to those noted in healthy, conscious controls. FINDINGS We assessed 16 patients diagnosed in the vegetative state, and 12 healthy controls. Three (19%) of 16 patients could repeatedly and reliably generate appropriate EEG responses to two distinct commands, despite being behaviourally entirely unresponsive (classification accuracy 61-78%). We noted no significant relation between patients' clinical histories (age, time since injury, cause, and behavioural score) and their ability to follow commands. When separated according to cause, two (20%) of the five traumatic and one (9%) of the 11 non-traumatic patients were able to successfully complete this task. INTERPRETATION Despite rigorous clinical assessment, many patients in the vegetative state are misdiagnosed. The EEG method that we developed is cheap, portable, widely available, and objective. It could allow the widespread use of this bedside technique for the rediagnosis of patients who behaviourally seem to be entirely vegetative, but who might have residual cognitive function and conscious awareness. FUNDING Medical Research Council, James S McDonnell Foundation, Canada Excellence Research Chairs Program, European Commission, Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique, Mind Science Foundation, Belgian French-Speaking Community Concerted Research Action, University Hospital of Liège, University of Liège.

[1]  Jack W. Tsao,et al.  Observed brain dynamics, P.P. Mitra, H. Bokil. Oxford University Press (2008), ISBN-13: 978-0-19-517808-1, 381 pages, $65.00 , 2009 .

[2]  E. Whitham,et al.  Scalp electrical recording during paralysis: Quantitative evidence that EEG frequencies above 20Hz are contaminated by EMG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  N. Sattar,et al.  Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state , 2012 .

[4]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  Eric Maris,et al.  Randomization tests for ERP topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[8]  J. Schoffelen,et al.  Comparing spectra and coherences for groups of unequal size , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[10]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State , 2006, Science.

[11]  K. Marx,et al.  Applications of Machine Learning and High‐Dimensional Visualization in Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, and Management , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  William Stafford Noble,et al.  Support vector machine , 2013 .

[13]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Probing command following in patients with disorders of consciousness using a brain–computer interface , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Laurie Zoloth,et al.  Willful modulations of brain activity in disorders of consciousness, by MM Monti, A Vanhaudenhuyse, MR Coleman, M Boly, JD Pickard, L Tshibanda, AM Owen, S Laureys: New England Journal of Medicine , 2010 .

[16]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[17]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[18]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Coma and consciousness: Paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[19]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Neurological disorders and the structure of human consciousness , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  A. Marcel Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  N. Childs,et al.  Accuracy of diagnosis of persistent vegetative state , 1993, Neurology.

[22]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  Determination of awareness in patients with severe brain injury using EEG power spectral analysis , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Source localization using eventrelated desynchronization (ERD) within the alpha band , 2005, Brain Topography.

[24]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK coma recovery scale—revised , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[25]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  Steven Laureys,et al.  Neuroimaging and Disorders of Consciousness: Envisioning an Ethical Research Agenda , 2008, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[27]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Motor imagery activates primary sensorimotor area in humans , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[29]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  F. H. Lopes da Silva,et al.  Short‐lived brain state after cued motor imagery in naive subjects , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  Quentin Noirhomme,et al.  Reanalysis of “Bedside detection of awareness in the vegetative state: a cohort study” , 2013, The Lancet.

[32]  Lionel Naccache,et al.  Psychology. Is she conscious? , 2006, Science.

[33]  Fang Sun,et al.  Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  D.J. McFarland,et al.  The wadsworth BCI research and development program: at home with BCI , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[37]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Exploration of computational methods for classification of movement intention during human voluntary movement from single trial EEG , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  K. Andrews,et al.  Misdiagnosis of the vegetative state: retrospective study in a rehabilitation unit , 1996, BMJ.

[39]  Lionel Naccache,et al.  Is She Conscious? , 2006, Science.

[40]  A M Owen,et al.  Relationship between etiology and covert cognition in the minimally conscious state , 2012, Neurology.

[41]  Steven Laureys The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation , 2008, The Lancet Neurology.

[43]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning with kernels , 2001 .

[44]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  Nicholas D Schiff,et al.  Pattern classification of volitional functional magnetic resonance imaging responses in patients with severe brain injury. , 2012, Archives of neurology.

[46]  M. Boly,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: Clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment , 2009, BMC neurology.

[47]  N. Birbaumer Breaking the silence: brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[48]  Adrian M. Owen,et al.  Detecting Awareness in the Vegetative State: Electroencephalographic Evidence for Attempted Movements to Command , 2012, PloS one.

[49]  N. Schiff,et al.  Dissociations between behavioural and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based evaluations of cognitive function after brain injury. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  Morten Overgaard,et al.  How can we know if patients in coma, vegetative state or minimally conscious state are conscious? , 2009, Progress in brain research.

[51]  Morten Overgaard,et al.  Neural Correlates of Contents and Levels of Consciousness , 2010, Front. Psychology.