Quantum mechanical vs. empirical potential modeling of uranium dioxide (UO2) surfaces: (111), (110), and (100)

Abstract To evaluate the stability, potential reactivity, and relaxation mechanisms on different uraninite surfaces, surface energy values were calculated and structural relaxation was determined for the (111), (110), and (100) crystallographic faces of uranium dioxide (UO2) using quantum mechanical (density functional theory) and empirical potential computational methods. Quantum mechanical results are compared with empirical potential results, which use surface slab models with two different geometries, as well as various different empirical force fields. The strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches are evaluated, and surface stabilizing mechanisms such as relaxation, charge redistribution, and electronic stabilization are investigated. Quantum mechanical (q.m.) surface energy results are in agreement with the relative surface energy trends resulting from calculations using three different empirical potential sets for uranium and oxygen (two from Catlow 1977; one from Meis and Gale 1998), and with empirical force-field values published in the literature (Abramowski et al. 1999, 2001). The (111) surface consistently has the lowest surface energy (0.461 J/m2 from q.m. calculations) and the smallest amount of surface relaxation, followed by the (110) surface (0.846 J/m2; q.m.), and the (100) surface (1.194 J/m2; q.m.) (quantum mechanical surface energy values in parentheses are for surface slabs with a thickness of four UO2 units). Differences exist, however, in the absolute values of surface energies calculated as a function of potential set used. Quantum mechanical values are consistently lower than values calculated using empirical potential methods. A fourth potential set is presented that is derived from fitting electrostatic and short-range repulsive parameters to experimental bulk properties and surface energies and relaxations from quantum mechanical calculations.

[1]  A. Rohl,et al.  Structure, stability and morphology of stoichiometric ceria crystallites , 1998 .

[2]  J. Boettger.  Predicted spin-orbit coupling effect on the magnetic ordering of crystalline uranium dioxide , 2003 .

[3]  G. Briggs,et al.  An STM study of the UO2(001) surface , 1999 .

[4]  W. Ellis.  Low‐Energy Electron Diffraction Studies of Uranium Dioxide , 1968 .

[5]  E. Aprá,et al.  The electronic structure of hematite {001} surfaces: Applications to the interpretation of STM images and heterogeneous surface reactions , 1996 .

[6]  Richard L. Martin,et al.  Hybrid density-functional theory and the insulating gap of UO2. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  C. Catlow,et al.  Point defect and electronic properties of uranium dioxide , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  J. Gale,et al.  Computational study of tetravalent uranium and plutonium lattice diffusion in zircon , 1998 .

[9]  Robin W. Grimes,et al.  Morphology of UO2 , 1999 .

[10]  J. Killeen.  The effect of niobium oxide additions on the electrical conductivity of UO2 , 1980 .

[11]  J. Perdew,et al.  Accurate and simple density functional for the electronic exchange energy: Generalized gradient approximation. , 1986, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[12]  V. Heine,et al.  Ab initio databases for fitting and testing interatomic potentials , 1996 .

[13]  A. Rohl,et al.  Modelling the morphology of minerals by computer , 1995, Mineralogical Magazine.

[14]  C. Catlow,et al.  Trapping and solution of fission Xe in UO2.: Part 1. Single gas atoms and solution from underpressurized bubbles , 1985 .

[15]  P. W. Tasker,et al.  The stability of ionic crystal surfaces , 1979 .

[16]  G. Shirane,et al.  NEUTRON-DIFFRACTION STUDY OF ANTIFERROMAGNETISM IN UO$sub 2$ , 1965 .

[17]  T. N. Taylor,et al.  A LEED study of UO2(∼100) vicinal surfaces☆ , 1978 .

[18]  Adrian P. Sutton,et al.  Effect of Mott-Hubbard correlations on the electronic structure and structural stability of uranium dioxide , 1997 .

[19]  S. Dudarev,et al.  Imaging insulating oxides by elevated-temperature STM , 1998 .

[20]  M. J. Cooper.  Analysis of powder diffraction data , 1982 .

[21]  R. Grimes,et al.  Structures of UO2 and PuO2 surfaces with hydroxide coverage , 2005 .

[22]  A. Pasturel,et al.  Cohesive properties of UO2 , 1996 .

[23]  W. Ellis.  LEED studies of UO2(∼111) vicinal surfaces☆ , 1974 .

[24]  A. Rohl.  MARVIN: a new computer code for studying surfaces and interfaces and its application to calculating the crystal morphologies of corundum and zircon , 1995 .

[25]  R. Grimes,et al.  Modification of UO2 crystal morphologies through hydroxylation , 2001 .

[26]  M. Payne,et al.  Electronic structure, properties, and phase stability of inorganic crystals: A pseudopotential plane‐wave study , 2000 .

[27]  G. Briggs,et al.  Scanning tunneling microscopy of the UO2 (111) surface , 1996 .

[28]  C. Duke,et al.  Dependence of oxide surface structure on surface topology and local chemical bonding , 1991 .

[29]  T. Arias,et al.  Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total energy calculations: molecular dynamics and co , 1992 .

[30]  G. Briggs,et al.  The atomic structure of the UO2+x(110) surface and the effects of interstitial oxygen: an elevated-temperature STM study , 1998 .

[31]  S. Dudarev,et al.  Surface structure and bonding in the strongly correlated metal oxides NiO and UO2 , 1998 .

[32]  J. Boettger,et al.  Fully relativistic density functional calculations on hydroxylated actinide oxide surfaces , 2002 .

[33]  Julian D. Gale,et al.  The General Utility Lattice Program (GULP) , 2003 .

[34]  Robin W. Grimes,et al.  Surface defect configurations on the (100) dipolar surface ofUO2 , 2005 .

[35]  R. Ewing,et al.  Structural formula of uraninite , 1992 .

[36]  K. Ikushima,et al.  First-order phase transition in UO 2 : 235 U and 17 O NMR study , 2001 .

[37]  W. Kohn,et al.  Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects , 1965 .

[38]  G. Lander,et al.  Neutron diffraction study of U O 2 : Antiferromagnetic state , 1976 .