Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale

The innovations of science often point to ideas and behaviors that must spread and take root in communities to have impact. Ideas, practices, and behaviors need to go from accepted truths on the part of a few scientists to commonplace beliefs and norms in the minds of the many. Moving from scientific discoveries to public good requires social influence. We introduce a structured influence process (SIP) framework to explain how social networks (i.e., the structure of social influence) and human social motives (i.e., the process of social influence wherein one person’s attitudes and behaviors affect another’s) are used collectively to enact social influence within a community. The SIP framework advances the science of scientific communication by positing social influence events that consider both the “who” and the “how” of social influence. This framework synthesizes core ideas from two bodies of research on social influence. The first is network research on social influence structures, which identifies who are the opinion leaders and who among their network of peers shapes their attitudes and behaviors. The second is research on social influence processes in psychology, which explores how human social motives such as the need for accuracy or the need for affiliation stimulate behavior change. We illustrate the practical implications of the SIP framework by applying it to the case of reducing neonatal mortality in India.

[1]  T. Snijders,et al.  Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior , 2007 .

[2]  P. Blau Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[4]  B. A. Farbey,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1966 .

[5]  Frank Harary,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs , 1965 .

[6]  N. Anderson,et al.  Combining visual and verbal information in an impression-formation task. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  H. Rao,et al.  Fool's Gold: Social Proof in the Initiation and Abandonment of Coverage by Wall Street Analysts , 2001 .

[8]  Verling C. Troldahl A FIELD TEST OF A MODIFIED “TWO-STEP FLOW OF COMMUNICATION” MODEL , 1966 .

[9]  C. K. Hofling,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY IN NURSE‐PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIPS , 1966, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[10]  R. Cialdini,et al.  New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements , 2000 .

[11]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization , 2012, Nature.

[12]  Sergey Brin,et al.  The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[13]  Simon Brown,et al.  The new deficit model. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[14]  Alex Bavelas A Mathematical Model for Group Structures , 1948 .

[15]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Social Beings: Core Motives in Social Psychology , 2003 .

[16]  J. Burger Obedience to Authority , 2011 .

[17]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[18]  T. Valente Network Interventions , 2012, Science.

[19]  G. Tarde The Laws of Imitation , 2009 .

[20]  K. Lewin,et al.  The Practical Theorist: The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin , 1971 .

[21]  R. Bornstein Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[22]  Katrin Baumgartner,et al.  Persuasion Theory And Research , 2016 .

[23]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[24]  F. H. Hankins,et al.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[25]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[27]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[28]  Tung Bui,et al.  Harnessing the Influence of Social Proof in Online Shopping: The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales of Digital Microproducts , 2011, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[29]  R. Baumeister,et al.  The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Social Influence: A Comment on Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[31]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Computational Social Science , 2009, Science.

[32]  E. Cassell Consent or obedience? Power and authority in medicine. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[34]  D. Bakan The duality of human existence : an essay on psychology and religion , 1966 .

[35]  Linda L. Carli,et al.  Similarity and Satisfaction in Roommate Relationships , 1991 .

[36]  D. Green,et al.  An Experiment Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Encouraging Voter Participation by Inducing Feelings of Pride or Shame , 2010 .

[37]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[38]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[39]  Christopher W. Larimer,et al.  Social Pressure and Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Experiment , 2008, American Political Science Review.

[40]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[41]  D. Byrne Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. , 1961, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[42]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[43]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[44]  D. Green,et al.  Introduction to Social Pressure and Voting: New Experimental Evidence , 2010 .

[45]  J. van der Pligt,et al.  What is peer group influence , 1985 .

[46]  R. Cialdini CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment , 2022 .

[47]  Wayne A. Danielson,et al.  Diffusion of Knowledge of the Major News Story , 1960 .

[48]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Agentic and Communal Values: Their Scope and Measurement , 2012, Journal of personality assessment.

[50]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .

[51]  George Loewenstein,et al.  Helping a Victim or Helping the Victim: Altruism and Identifiability , 2003 .

[52]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  Sinan Aral,et al.  Identifying Influential and Susceptible Members of Social Networks , 2012, Science.

[54]  R. Gottlieb,et al.  The New Yorker , 1987 .

[55]  James W. Westcott,et al.  The Practical Theorist The Life and Work of Kurt Lewin , 1970 .

[56]  L. Festinger A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[57]  C. Winick The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians , 2016 .

[58]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[59]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[60]  G. Poggi Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[61]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network analysis of 2-mode data , 1997 .

[62]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[63]  E. S. Conklin Human Motivation , 1932, The Journal of Religion.

[64]  J. Burger,et al.  What a Coincidence! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[65]  R. Cialdini,et al.  The Application of Persuasion Theory to the Development Of Effective Proenvironmental Public Service Announcements , 2000 .

[66]  Peter Hedström,et al.  Mesolevel Networks and the Diffusion of Social Movements: The Case of the Swedish Social Democratic Party1 , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Commentary - Contagion in Prescribing Behavior Among Networks of Doctors , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[68]  S. Fiske,et al.  Comprar Social Beings: A Core Motives Approach to Social Psychology | Benjamin L. Miller | 9780470129111 | Wiley , 2009 .

[69]  P. Pliner,et al.  Compliance without pressure: Some further data on the foot-in-the-door technique , 1974 .

[70]  E. Rogers,et al.  HOMOPHILY-HETEROPHILY: RELATIONAL CONCEPTS FOR COMMUNICATION RESEARCH , 1970 .

[71]  D. Krackhardt Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[72]  G. Halff Two-Step-Flow-of-Communication , 2005 .

[73]  S. Hill Putting the priorities first: medicines for maternal and child health. , 2012, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[74]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[75]  D. O’Keefe Persuasion , 1990, The Handbook of Communication Skills.

[76]  P. Gollwitzer,et al.  Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes , 2006 .

[77]  J. List,et al.  Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving , 2009, The quarterly journal of economics.

[78]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  Media Legitimation Effects in the Market for Initial Public Offerings , 2003 .

[79]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[80]  R. Baumeister A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[81]  Shan S. Kuo,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction in the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1968 .

[82]  T. Newcomb An approach to the study of communicative acts. , 1953, Psychological review.

[83]  D. T. Regan,et al.  Effects of a favor and liking on compliance , 1971 .

[84]  A. Pentland,et al.  Life in the network: The coming age of computational social science: Science , 2009 .

[85]  D. Kahan Fixing the communications failure , 2010, Nature.

[86]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[87]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affect and decision making: A hot topic , 2006 .

[88]  R Hogan,et al.  A socioanalytic theory of personality. , 1983, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[89]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[90]  L. Guest The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. , 1946 .

[91]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[92]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Public Communication Campaigns , 2012 .

[93]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[94]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Social Influence Network Theory: A Sociological Examination of Small Group Dynamics , 2011 .

[95]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[96]  R. G. Green Social motivation. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[97]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  The language that gets people to give: phrases that predict success on kickstarter , 2014, CSCW.