Efficient Learning of Non-Interacting Fermion Distributions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. Low. Classical shadows of fermions with particle number symmetry , 2022, 2208.08964.
[2] Theodore J. Yoder,et al. Optimal algorithms for learning quantum phase states , 2022, ArXiv.
[3] B. O’Gorman. Fermionic tomography and learning , 2022, arXiv.org.
[4] Joonho Lee,et al. Matchgate Shadows for Fermionic Quantum Simulation , 2022, 2207.13723.
[5] Mauro E. S. Morales,et al. Fermion Sampling: A Robust Quantum Computational Advantage Scheme Using Fermionic Linear Optics and Magic Input States , 2020, PRX Quantum.
[6] R. O'Donnell,et al. Improved Quantum data analysis , 2020, STOC.
[7] A. Miyake,et al. Fermionic Partial Tomography via Classical Shadows. , 2020, Physical review letters.
[8] C. Canonne. A short note on learning discrete distributions , 2020, 2002.11457.
[9] R. Kueng,et al. Predicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements , 2020, Nature Physics.
[10] Joel A. Tropp,et al. Fast state tomography with optimal error bounds , 2018, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.
[11] Andrea Rocchetto,et al. Stabiliser states are efficiently PAC-learnable , 2017, Quantum Inf. Comput..
[12] Scott Aaronson,et al. Shadow tomography of quantum states , 2017, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..
[13] Ashley Montanaro,et al. Learning stabilizer states by Bell sampling , 2017, 1707.04012.
[14] Ankur Moitra,et al. Learning Determinantal Point Processes with Moments and Cycles , 2017, ICML.
[15] Xiaodi Wu,et al. Sample-Optimal Tomography of Quantum States , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.
[16] Ryan O'Donnell,et al. Efficient quantum tomography , 2015, STOC.
[17] Ben Taskar,et al. An efficient algorithm for the symmetric principal minor assignment problem , 2015 .
[18] Alex Arkhipov,et al. BosonSampling is robust against small errors in the network matrix , 2014, 1412.2516.
[19] Holger Rauhut,et al. Low rank matrix recovery from rank one measurements , 2014, ArXiv.
[20] R. Gillan. New Editor-in-Chief for Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical , 2014 .
[21] Lance Fortnow,et al. Proceedings of the forty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing , 2011, STOC 2011.
[22] Scott Aaronson,et al. The computational complexity of linear optics , 2010, STOC '11.
[23] D. Gross,et al. Efficient quantum state tomography. , 2010, Nature communications.
[24] I. Ial,et al. Nature Communications , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.
[25] M. Ehler. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis , 2008 .
[26] Scott Aaronson,et al. The learnability of quantum states , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[27] Vlatko Vedral,et al. Introduction to Quantum Information Science , 2006 .
[28] Leslie G. Valiant,et al. Quantum Circuits That Can Be Simulated Classically in Polynomial Time , 2002, SIAM J. Comput..
[29] Emanuel Knill,et al. Fermionic Linear Optics and Matchgates , 2001, ArXiv.
[30] David P. DiVincenzo,et al. Classical simulation of noninteracting-fermion quantum circuits , 2001, ArXiv.
[31] Luc Devroye,et al. Combinatorial methods in density estimation , 2001, Springer series in statistics.
[32] Charles H. Bennett,et al. Quantum information and computation , 1995, Nature.
[33] Axthonv G. Oettinger,et al. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 1998 .
[34] Reck,et al. Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. , 1994, Physical review letters.
[35] Audra E. Kosh,et al. Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .
[36] Volker Strassen,et al. Algebraic Complexity Theory , 1991, Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, Volume A: Algorithms and Complexity.
[37] Euclid,et al. Advances in Applied Probability , 1981, Journal of Applied Probability.
[38] O. Macchi. The coincidence approach to stochastic point processes , 1975, Advances in Applied Probability.
[39] P. Schönemann,et al. A generalized solution of the orthogonal procrustes problem , 1966 .
[40] Physical Review , 1965, Nature.