Smart cements: repairs and sensors for concrete assets

Smart cements offer a unique opportunity to unify our approach to the remote monitoring and repair of concrete assets. Here, we present our latest progress in manufacturing and testing smart cement sensor-repairs based on fly ash geopolymers - a novel class of cement-like binders that cure to a strong, chemically resistant, electrically conductive shell. Since chloride and moisture are two of the leading causes of degradation of reinforced concrete, we are proposing a technology that is able to monitor chloride ingress into concretes at different levels of moisture. The main task of the work was to manufacture geopolymer binders for concrete specimens, and to cure them at ambient temperatures. We have studied how practical considerations, such as the concrete substrate’s maturity, can affect how or whether smart cements can be applied, thus understanding the main limitations of the technology. By using electrical impedance measurements, we aim to demonstrate that geopolymer skin layers can provide high resolution monitoring of chloride contamination at different levels of moisture. Here we present results which show that smart cements are sensitive to changes in humidity of the surrounding environment. Our goal is to develop a robust and field-worthy technology which unifies civil monitoring and maintenance. This goal is of key national importance to the US and many countries within Europe, who now face an ageing population of reinforced concrete bridges, tunnels and support structures.

[1]  K. Breugel,et al.  Autogenous shrinkage in high-performance cement paste: An evaluation of basic mechanisms , 2003 .

[2]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art , 2007 .

[3]  Chai Jaturapitakkul,et al.  NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature , 2011 .

[4]  Grzegorz Fusiek,et al.  Geopolymeric thermal conductivity sensors for surface-mounting onto concrete structures , 2016 .

[5]  Zuhua Zhang,et al.  Potential application of geopolymers as protection coatings for marine concrete II. Microstructure and anticorrosion mechanism , 2010 .

[6]  Mauricio Sánchez-Silva,et al.  Non-destructive methods for measuring chloride ingress into concrete: State-of-the-art and future challenges , 2014 .

[7]  Mohammad Ismail,et al.  Geopolymer mortars as sustainable repair material: A comprehensive review , 2017 .

[8]  J. Deventer,et al.  Geopolymers : structure, processing, properties and industrial applications , 2009 .

[9]  Pawel Niewczas,et al.  Hybrid optical-fibre/geopolymer sensors for structural health monitoring of concrete structures , 2015 .

[10]  Hao Wang,et al.  Fly ash-based geopolymers: The relationship between composition, pore structure and efflorescence , 2014 .

[11]  Lubomír Kopecký,et al.  ALUMINOSILICATE POLYMERS - INFLUENCE OF ELEVATED TEMPERATURES, EFFLORESCENCE , 2009 .

[12]  K. Hussin,et al.  Potential of Geopolymer Mortar as Concrete Repairing Materials , 2016 .

[13]  A. Lasia Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy and its Applications , 2014 .

[14]  Phillip Frank Gower Banfill,et al.  Properties of alkali-activated fly ashes determined from rheological measurements , 2005 .

[15]  O. Kayali,et al.  Effect of initial water content and curing moisture conditions on the development of fly ash-based geopolymers in heat and ambient temperature , 2014 .

[16]  A. V. Riessen,et al.  Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature , 2009 .

[17]  A. Rashad A comprehensive overview about the influence of different admixtures and additives on the properties of alkali-activated fly ash , 2014 .

[18]  Takahide Kimura,et al.  Effect of Nuclear Radiation on Alkali-Silica Reaction of Concrete , 2007 .